Uh, NO... I am not pulling anyone's chain. I am a Continental Flight Attendant and a former Delta Flight Attendant. I have never worked for US Airways, AA, UAL, or any other airline, aside from Song, if you want to consider it anything aside from Delta with a few planes given a new name. I don't understand how asking a simple question such as "Is 105 hours the max a F/A at US can fly?", something that would confuse anyone into thinking I work for them. If I did work for them, I would be on furlough, considering when I entered the industry.
Aside from all of that, yes we are all worried at CAL that we might merge with UAL. Not a single person at Continental want's it to happen and for good reasoning. We are not the most senior airline since we still offer retirement, but many of the people that work here remember quite well those good ole Denver day's, and what UAL did to Continental. I can't tell you how many commuter's I know from DEN, that would never set foot on a UAL plane, and do double commute's through IAH so not to given them a single dollar off of a ZED fare. I can't say I blame them. A company that once tried to put Continental under, is now cozying up and trying to marry us. One thing my decade in this industry has taught me is that people don't forget ANYTHING.
My biggest worry is the union's, our pension staying intact, and the fact that we would need fencing and slotting to fully protect ourselves. There are so many things that can and will go wrong with this and it's quite scary. IAD is so close to EWR, which will shrink? UAL's Flight Attendant's run on a very old out dated system. We have the freedom to fly 200 hour's (We have alot of six figure F/A's that do) or 0 if we so choose. I chose to leave Delta and give up my seniority because I felt they abused us being non-union. The last thing I want is to finally be at a semi-stable airline, and for it to be turned upside down. If I offend any UAL people, I'm sorry that I want to protect my own interest and my co-worker's first.