What's new

UA On Its Own...Is it Possible?

Excerpt from United Pilot's MEC update. June 6th, 2008. (Note: the UAL MEC Chairman is a member of the Board of Directors.):

"Recent reports of United Airlines’ impending demise are greatly exaggerated. The media pundits, financial analysts, and rival airline executives predicting another bankruptcy for United are the same people who predicted that United would never exit Chapter 11 bankruptcy, consistently miss earnings predictions, and praised the US Airways/America West merger announcement. Reporters are constantly hyperventilating as they report on leaks from “someone close to merger negotiations.â€￾ No one seems to care that they are invariably wrong.

Our competitors would like United to fail. Why? Because United generates an annual revenue of $17 billion. That is $17 billion that would otherwise be available to everyone else (see Figure 1).
The financial analysts insist that capacity reduction is the only solution that will save the airline industry, hence their calls for mergers, consolidations, capacity reductions and airline shut-downs. In MBA classrooms that may be true: reduced capacity results in reduced supply which allows for improved revenue control (supply versus demand). In the real world, however, capacity reduction is immediately filled either by start-up airlines or increased service by other airlines. One needs look no further than comments from Southwest Airlines in response to the most recent round of potential United-US Airways merger talks: CEO Gary Kelly said he welcomed the prospect of the combined carrier cutting back flights so that Southwest could quickly move in.

United Airlines is the sleeping giant of the US airline industry. United has the ability to generate $17 billion per year due to its revenue management. Adjusting for stage length, United was the leader in 2007 for Revenue per Available Seat Mile (RASM). This means United was able to charge more for its seats last year than any of its U.S. competitors (see figure 2). United also has a massive route structure that is touted by industry analysts as the strongest of any U.S. airline. It carries nearly 12 million passengers per year to international destinations throughout the world. It is a founding member of the Star Alliance. Its 55,000 employees worldwide are the best in the industry.

United’s cash reserve and unencumbered assets are well above industry average (see figure 3). This allowed United to restructure its current loan covenants to provide flexibility for its financial future."

Moral of the story: Don't believe every rant you read in the news, particularly those that are obviously biased against one airline in an environment where all airlines are at risk to one degree or another. These are usually no more than wishful thinking by someone who would benefit directly from their speculations coming true.

The real story is told by watching the cash flow and paying attention to the investors who control the money (ie: JP Morgan and and a few others.) Everything else is manipulation of data to support a particular opinion.
 
You can bite that apple yourself.

Analysts have developed an estimated fall order – should current condition continue with no change in the business models they see the airlines collapsing in this order.

1. US Airways
2. North West
3. American/United (positions 3 &4 are a toss up in their view)
4. American/United
5. Delta
6. Continental
7. South West (has the highest costs in the industry & just took out a $680mil loan to weather the storm).

So no, I'm happy we didn't go near US Airways, may you rest in peace. :cold:


Interesting, LCC has not announced any dragonian cuts yet. Is it possible that they have already postitioned themselves, as is best possible, to weather the present storm. It is amazing that "big airline" people are still so arrogant. Good luck to us all.
 
Moral of the story: only analysts and MBAs who support the disastrous management of UAUA are good guys.

Question: how are the analysts and MBAs who endorsed TED doing these days? Perhaps they work for Pardus Management?
 
Moral of the story: only analysts and MBAs who support the disastrous management of UAUA are good guys.

Question: how are the analysts and MBAs who endorsed TED doing these days? Perhaps they work for Pardus Management?
Yawn... 🙄 Your contempt for United is duly noted (again). But once again your post jumps to conclusions and misses the point. Where has anyone said that they support UA's management at this point? ALPA has made it clear that they do not support Tilton or his upper management team. However the doom and gloom predicted by some is not as bad as they would have you think. The rest of the MEC update went on to say that UA's problems are many and stem from poor management, and that UA is well positioned to deal with the obstacles ahead if the company invests in it's employees and management focuses on running the core business instead of enriching themselves.

Again I will say, watching the money and cash position, instead of reading and believing every news article, (or aviation forum for that matter) is the only real indication as to the health of an airline in this current economic cycle we are in. Everything else is speculation and opinion. I said exactly the same thing at every twist and turn of UA's bankruptcy, when these same talking heads were salivating over, and predicting, the death of United. But we're still here. (Thanks to the employees to a far grater degree than management.)

So rant on if you must.
 
The merger is not over. Its just not happening now. Today the Officers scammed their way through the annual meeting and got re-elected.

See this topic United Officers hide from shareholders..
 
Interesting, LCC has not announced any dragonian cuts yet. Is it possible that they have already postitioned themselves, as is best possible, to weather the present storm. It is amazing that "big airline" people are still so arrogant. Good luck to us all.

Well, you were just a little overly impatient...

U.S. Airways announces staff reduction of 1700

This includes 600 in LAS station alone.
 
And if I was so inclined I could find more 'analysts' to support my position of no value added.

All this wasted energy by the UA crowd to find a dance partner instead of focusing on their own appearance is sickening.

If you are that good and pretty then the numbers (and crowds) will flock to you.

CO does not need UA. Face reality.
Well, well, well, freshhell. Maybe it's time you now face reality. <_<

Now that UA and CO have announced that they "have reached an extensive cooperative agreement that will link the two airlines' worldwide networks and services" do you care to rethink your statement of "no value added" or care to post some more analysis to support your position?
 

Latest posts

Back
Top