Hopeful
Veteran
- Dec 21, 2002
- 5,998
- 347
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
,A whiny ad campaign to cry about missed opportunities. Money well spent, no doubt.
Any wonder why so few private sector employees are unionized?
A whiny ad campaign to cry about missed opportunities. Money well spent, no doubt.
Any wonder why so few private sector employees are unionized?
,
Oh, I think not.......With the current Wall Street bunch having their ultimate greedy ways exposed, this might not be a bad idea. Millions of people unemployed, company profits lower than whale dong....stock value in the toilet ready to be flushed......and the elite people at the top of the food chain still continue to get their due.
For decades, management has successfully painted unions as the unrealistic and greedy ones, but now as we can see with AIG and others where the true greed comes from.
Well my good cyber friend/Legal Eagle, Thats ALL ABOUT TO CHANGE with...EFCA !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Even if the Dems got ousted in 2012,..............( I don't think Now is the best time to push EFCA),..........just WAIT until the 2010 congressional elections are over. EFCA will Be the FIRST new law written(probably) in January 2011 !!!!
How much did this well thought out ad campaign cost the members?....
It have been more productive to simply give each member a "bonus" by not issuing the ad campaign and reducing their monthly dues by the pro-rated cost of the ad buy.
I thought you and the other blue-aid drinkers said EFCA would be signed in Barry O's first 100 days? What happened?
There are also states pursuing ballot initiatives making secret balloting a constitutional right in all elections including collective bargaining. You'll have a hard time convincing Americans that secret balloting is bad. Most believe it to be a fundamental right already, so the unions will have an uphill battle fighting that.
If EFCA couldn't hit the floor now with a blue majority in both chambers, it ain't gonna happen.
If they want to join a union, then let them do it without the fear of reprisal for disagreeing with the guys in brown shirts and jackboots handing them the ballot with "Yes" already selected...
I sometimes read too much into things and I'm mistaken when reading internet posts, but I just wanted to be sure. You're not trying to make an equations to Nazi "brown shirts" are you?... without the fear of reprisal for disagreeing with the guys in brown shirts and jackboots...
I have less of a problem with that, actually. Today, you still have the right to vote in private without fear of retribution.
All card check does is eliminates the right of a person to agree or disagree in private.