What's new

US and IRAN...reach NUKE deal !

Status
Not open for further replies.
southwind said:
Last time I checked Iran was the only country that has stated it wants to wipe another country off the face of the planet.
Not only that, I thought the United States didn't negotiate with terrorists. Guess BaRack missed that memo!
 
 
Holy crap.  Going to have to remember this one as another one of your colossally ignorant statements.  

 
North Korea's National Defense Commission took to the airwaves today to threaten the United States with the "most disastrous final doom on its mainland," warning that "the time of the nightmare" is near.
 
 
 
 
Just the first of countless ones that popped up on this thing called the internet.  You should try it sometime.
 
And as pointed out we did negotiate with terrorists.  Reagan sold arms to get hostages released.  Worked really well.  Sold them over 1,000 TOW missiles as well as 30 HAWKS and we got hostages released.  The rub was that the Iranians figured out a really nifty plan.  Since the US was willing to sell arms to get hostages, all they needed to do was get more hostages.  OOOpppppsss.  
 
The thing about history is that it already happened and you making stuff up about how you wish things happened does not make it true.  Just makes you look like a fool who cannot research anything.
 
Brings to mind the time you thought Obama released the terrorists from Gitmo when it was actually Bush and you had no clue because you did not even bother to read the link you posted.  
 
That was stupid.  The comments you made above  are exponentially dumber on a magnitude that is amazing even for you. 
 
KCFlyer said:
 
What does Iran/Contra mean to you?   If you recall (Reagan couldn't), just 5 years earlier, Iran was holding Americans hostage for over a year.   Then we sold them arms.  So yeah...technically, we didn't negotiate with them.
 
The jury is still out on what influence Reagan had on the release of the 52 hostages but if you look up info on the release of the 7 hostages held outside of Iran by Iranians we did negotiate for their release by selling the weapons to Iran.  It back fired in an epic manner.
 
I think I posted a link to the events in a different thread where I responded to Eolesons delusions about Reagan.
 
777 fixer said:
You mean we shouldn't talk to countries that funnel money to terrorist organizations? If that's the case then we should never have negotiated with the USSR. If you had an even basic understanding of history you would know that the USSR funneled money to various terrorist organizations in it's time. But I'm going to guess you were unaware of that little fact.
We buy oil from Saudi Arabia and they are a huge sponsor of terrorism.
 
If you want to get down to bras tacks, the US is one of the biggest sponsor of terrorism.  Where do people think the money that Middle Eastern countries give terrorists comes from?  Sure as hell is not from bake sales.   It's oil revenue.  We are addicted to the crap and we buy it by the barrel (no pun intended).  
 
Al Qaeda's $$$ and a big 'ol chunk of its members, including 19 really famous ones, came primarily from where...?

Ohhhh, a certain Kingdom that we not only negotiate with, but call our friends and spend billions of your and my money to protect and serve.

I'm thinkin' the ME situation, including Iran, is a bit more complex an issue than Rush, Megan, Bill, and their counterpart on the other end are capable of having an "informed" opinion about, much less make a worthwhile judgement on.

Their agenda is clear. Support their team and destroy the other.

All the rest is just hot air.

Not a source of any value
 
KCFlyer said:
Looks like somebody struck a nerve
Looks like someone hit the nail on the head.

BaRack negotiates with Terrorist and leaves 4 Americans behind.

Leaving Americans behind, Iran/Benghazi, seems to be the norm in this administration.....unless your a traitor (Bergdahl).
 
Gotta love the monolithic obedience and lack of critical thinking the left has to their dear leaders. They could say "go jump off a ledge" and they will defend it to their very core.
 
townpete said:
Gotta love the monolithic obedience and lack of critical thinking the left has to their dear leaders. They could say "go jump off a ledge" and they will defend it to their very core.
 
Just as right wingers will still insist that invading IRaq was the right thing to do.   And the "lack of critical thinking" comment is comical coming from a group whose idea of critical thinking is to say "megadittos".  
 
townpete said:
Gotta love the monolithic obedience and lak of critical thinking the left has to their dear leaders. They could say "go jump off a ledge" and they will defend it to their very core.
Gotta' admit, there are some.
As in a few

There are on both sides of the aisle, and it gets more so the further an individual is to one end or other of the spectrum. More numerous, more extreme, more narrow-minded and less thinking going on.

Statistically, as Fox etc have many more viewers and listeners, more of the brain dead lockstep marching ledge-jumping non-thinkers are over there on the not quite right.

At least those on the left tend to have compassin for their fellow humans
 
Gotta love these drones all giddy over this crowning achievement for the "appeaser in chief".
 
Iran got every thing they wanted. We got nothing.
 
We give them billions of US taxpayer dollars. We got nothing.
 
And the kicker?
 
They get to "self inspect" to make sure they are holding themselves to account. Not kidding.
 
What did we get?
 
Nothing.
 
Congrats libtards, you own this!
 
Ifly2 said:
Gotta' admit, there are some.
As in a few

There are on both sides of the aisle, and it gets more so the further an individual is to one end or other of the spectrum. More numerous, more extreme, more narrow-minded and less thinking going on.

Statistically, as Fox etc have many more viewers and listeners, more of the brain dead lockstep marching ledge-jumping non-thinkers are over there on the not quite right.

At least those on the left tend to have compassin for their fellow terrorists.
 
fify
 
Ifly2 said:
At least those on the left tend to have compassin for their fellow humans
The leftists have "compassin" for fellow humans? 
 
I guess that applies to the humans outside the womb, the unwanted ones inside the womb get kinda "crunched up" at times by medical instruments.
 
Once Obammy gives Iran the bomb, human "compassin" won't be a huge worry for the world.
 
Kev3188 said:
Closeted people can get cranky...
 
Cranky are the people twisting themselves into pretzels defending this deal.
 
Its amusing to say the least...
 
 
townpete said:
Gotta love these drones all giddy over this crowning achievement for the "appeaser in chief".
 
Iran got every thing they wanted. We got nothing.
 
We give them billions of US taxpayer dollars. We got nothing.
 
And the kicker?
 
They get to "self inspect" to make sure they are holding themselves to account. Not kidding.
 
What did we get?
 
Nothing.
 
Congrats libtards, you own this!
 

Do you have a link for this "billions of tax payers dollars" or are you just making this stuff up?
 
 
Hackman said:
The leftists have "compassin" for fellow humans? 
 
I guess that applies to the humans outside the womb, the unwanted ones inside the womb get kinda "crunched up" at times by medical instruments.
 
Once Obammy gives Iran the bomb, human "compassin" won't be a huge worry for the world.
 

If conservatives cared about the unborn they would do everything possible to prevent unwanted pregnancies from happening and ensuring that prenatal care is available to all who need it. Sadly, conservatives don't give a crap about the unborn or born.

NK has the bomb already and conservatives have not said boo. Funny that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top