Clue, no more point-counterpoint. Here is what I have to say without getting into replying to each of your paragraphs.
With my track record calling for ending the RICO (paying the evil-doers their legal costs if they promise not to do it again), posting the full version of the Wilder comments, not just the USAPA sanitized, number other issues, Im not the most popular guy in CLT HQ. Plant?
Money used is ours to use, especially since we keep it all, not just 20% and since we have less FPLers getting less money. We care only what MIGS think about how we spend it.
The MDA depos are fact, not "propoganda." One thing I have never said is we’d win the Ninth, LOA84, reduced west hours or the LSJs arbitration. All I said was those things would play out on their own and no amount of your posting would change that. I posted we’d win the Susie. We did. That was an easy call.
Accepting the Kirby will put us millions poorer. Along with it comes more furloughs, no floor on hulls/block hours, no $70M bonus, unless you think the company would modify Kirby and give East something they won’t give west. If so, your side giving up $40M ($70M ratioed) to “buy†the NIC/Kirby. No Vacation parity for 4 more years for us plus 3hr/day vs 3:40/day for all. No more SAP with PBS. Commuting pilots bidding more conservatively, equipment or seat downgrades because they could float between block and reserve every other month. Or downgrades/furloughs from PBS efficiencies. PBS that doesn’t honor seniority, favoring lowest cost schedule ahead of seniority.
If Ninth backs Wake and we put out ridiculous pay demands hoping to keep the NIC from coming to a vote, Wake would put a hammer down. But asking for industry average and the company countering with the Kirby, I don’t see that as anything but honest bargaining with company/union miles apart. If we lose the Ninth, the NIC has to be in the contract. But with LOA84 ahead of us, definite loss of $70M and the Kirby as the company’s best offer in the good times, you couldn’t get 20% support. Losing the $70M is like a reverse signing bonus, unless you think parker will give it to us and not to you.
With our augmented F/O Trans-Atlantic crews, even if everyone joined, we’d still have 140 more F/Os. Also 100+ 190 C/Os. Their Kirby pay is the frozen TA C/O rates. Not a lot of support to throw the F/Os under the bus there, either. Our leadership is controlled by those who ran on holding out for minimum industry average. Kirby doesn’t come close. Biggest problem is getting a Kirby-type TA out of committee for a vote. I don't think another “let my Daddy vote!†would ever materialize.
Clue, we’re all willing to debate, but let's concentrate on concrete facts, not this constant west is going to win, east C/Os are going to throw F/Os under the bus. No one knows how the Ninth will rule. But we do know how East C/Os are voting. We saw them in the USAPA election and the latest one-size-fits all bonus vote. You’ll never drive a wedge in that support.
As one left seater put it in the cockpit recently, “When I leave this airline, this seat is yours.â€