HPearlyretiree,
I understand where you're coming from, but to borrow from Lloyd Bentsen, Doug Parker is no Ed Beauvais or Mike Conway.
It wasn't the 747s themselves that were a dumb move, it was getting them before they had good places to fly them. Then AWA was stuck with the planes. And it was fuel that killed the company then.
Parker, on the other hand, is quoted in the most recent Business Week as saying AWA is planning for $45 oil because they can't assume it's going to be lower than it is. And he's well on the record in saying that AWA won't do anything that will endanger the airline. And he proved it by walking away from the ATA deal.
I don't know what opportunities AWA might potentially be interested in, but I was suggesting some possibilities. I am quite sure that Parker won't go for any that are unduly risky.
I understand where you're coming from, but to borrow from Lloyd Bentsen, Doug Parker is no Ed Beauvais or Mike Conway.
It wasn't the 747s themselves that were a dumb move, it was getting them before they had good places to fly them. Then AWA was stuck with the planes. And it was fuel that killed the company then.
Parker, on the other hand, is quoted in the most recent Business Week as saying AWA is planning for $45 oil because they can't assume it's going to be lower than it is. And he's well on the record in saying that AWA won't do anything that will endanger the airline. And he proved it by walking away from the ATA deal.
I don't know what opportunities AWA might potentially be interested in, but I was suggesting some possibilities. I am quite sure that Parker won't go for any that are unduly risky.