What's new

WMD's found?

Subscribe to the lies, local 12, if it makes you feel better. Don't you think that there just might be some bias in those ultra-conservative-religious-right-wing BLOGS you keep referencing? If not, then I think we've summed up your problem pretty easily.
Now you've gone and done it.....someones at the door.
 
Yea thats what I thought, more liberal spin without answers. :up:

Sorry...just to help you recall...you posed no question. You posted crap from a blog that I already discredited in another thread by showing how you can get iraqi civilian death counts ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands...not 71, though. And It is amazing that you, tha all knower, can tell us who these deaths can be attributed to. They ALL can be attributed to the US b/c our invasion is what has sparked the violence.

Without answers? again...you posed no question. where is my answer on what ideas you have about resolving the issues in Iraq? You are the biggest hypocrite here and that is why I walk away from you often. The only thing you know how to say is "I know you are but what am I". It is like I am debating with a dead toad. Only the dead toad shows some maturity and reason.
 
Sorry...just to help you recall...you posed no question. You posted crap from a blog that I already discredited in another thread by showing how you can get iraqi civilian death counts ranging from tens of thousands to hundreds of thousands...not 71, though. And It is amazing that you, tha all knower, can tell us who these deaths can be attributed to. They ALL can be attributed to the US b/c our invasion is what has sparked the violence.

Without answers? again...you posed no question. where is my answer on what ideas you have about resolving the issues in Iraq? You are the biggest hypocrite here and that is why I walk away from you often. The only thing you know how to say is "I know you are but what am I". It is like I am debating with a dead toad. Only the dead toad shows some maturity and reason.
Ive given the answer more than once it just does'nt suit your liberal brain damaged Ideas. I will not repeat for you, go back and read.

I will continue to post the facts on Islam, if you dont like it click the ignore button.

Now go run along home, your helicopter awaits you. 😉
 
Ive given the answer more than once it just does'nt suit your liberal brain damaged Ideas. I will not repeat for you, go back and read.

Nice try. You've said that you don't need to answer that. All talk and no plan. At least I try. You stay the course and evade the questions and you'll be just fine...
 
(PITbull @ Oct 17 2006, 01:27 AM)

Dell,

I recommend a good read for you: State of Denial by Bob Woodward.

I spend the weekend reading it. With regard to WMD (none found in IRAQ and 946 sites were targeted...they found none.

Pages 84,85, 89,90, 107,112, 115, 121.


Yeah..yeah..yeah.....946 sites in a country as big as California.....and its common knowledge he was burying them...and we don't or didn't have the manpower to look under every stone...and I guess it depends on what your definition of WMD is.....old still quite usable chem warheads don't count....Bekka valley, US got sat pix of them burying WMD's...oops I told ya.....now...

from your hero:

In 1998, U.S. President Bill Clinton expressed concerns about Iraq's failure to disarm, noting that he believed the country would give its weapons of mass destruction to other countries.


was George Bush simply following the law in Iraq? :shock:

Clinton also stated his belief that Saddam Hussein would eventually use these weapons - it was "only a matter of time." On September 29, 1998, the United States Congress passed the Iraq Liberation Act, which states that the U.S. intends to remove Saddam Hussein from office and replace the government with a democratic institution. The Iraq Liberation Act was signed by President Clinton on October 31, 1998. On the same day, Iraq announced it would no longer cooperate with United Nations weapons inspectors.

My oh my...looks like we're in Iraq because of Bill Clinton :lol:


On March 17, 2003 President George W. Bush stated in an address to the nation:

"Intelligence gathered by this and other governments leaves no doubt that the Iraq regime continues to possess and conceal(keyword-conceal) some of the most lethal weapons ever devised. This regime has already used weapons of mass destruction against Iraq's neighbors and against Iraq's people."




Supporting statements by President Clinton
The following statements were made by President Clinton on December 16, 1998. The eve of the vote on his impeachment.

"Saddam Hussein must not be allowed to threaten his neighbors or the world with nuclear arms, poison gas or biological weapons."

"Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them. Not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq."

"The best way to end that threat once and for all is with a new Iraqi government -- a government ready to live in peace with its neighbors, a government that respects the rights of its people. Bringing change in Baghdad will take time and effort. We will strengthen our engagement with the full range of Iraqi opposition forces and work with them effectively and prudently."





On May 18, 2005, in response to the publication of the "Downing Street memo," Paul Craig Roberts wrote an article calling for Bush's impeachment for lying to Congress about the case for war.This should be read in light of the fact that regime change in Iraq was the official policy of the US government since 1998, under the Clinton Administration.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top