http://www.startribune.com/1778/story/327311.html
You can't have it both ways, your either still on strike with on unemployment benefits or the strike is over with unemployment benefits. Did you vote on this?
Thornton cited a legal precedent set in a 1980s case. Hormel workers struck in August 1985, and by March 1986, the company had filled the jobs with replacement workers. The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the strikers did not qualify for unemployment benefits until the strike officially ended. In May 1986, the union's trustee made an unconditional offer to return to work.
You can't have it both ways, your either still on strike with on unemployment benefits or the strike is over with unemployment benefits. Did you vote on this?
Thornton cited a legal precedent set in a 1980s case. Hormel workers struck in August 1985, and by March 1986, the company had filled the jobs with replacement workers. The Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that the strikers did not qualify for unemployment benefits until the strike officially ended. In May 1986, the union's trustee made an unconditional offer to return to work.