Well, of course you are opening "old wounds"...and you know it. You, and all your west buddies have a new campaign underway to attempt to convince the east to drop all this and "move on"...even prechillil wants to help us poor defenseless fools out east. Stevie Wonder could see what is behind all this....and yet you all want to "save us from ourselves".Let's ponder some strategy, which means long term thinking.
USAPA is fighting tooth and nail for reversible error which is absolutely their right. So let's assume that in 12 months that the Ninth Circuit grants USAPA everything it wants as far as a new trial and remands the case for a new trial. What do you think will happen at a new trial, especially if Stephan Bradford is correctly served a subpoena for trial? What is going to happen when he has to testify and there is already a paper trail that will lock in his testimony about hos motivations in forming USAPA? Remember that there is documentation that at least partially establishes that it was to defeat Nicolau.
Now I am not trying to open up wounds here. I am suggesting that the expense of time, money and effort is likely futile.
Folks need to think ahead and, at the same time, realize that the company is not going to be serious until the pilots get this behind them.
I think you will see things get "quite " serious early next year at least on the East side.Folks need to think ahead and, at the same time, realize that the company is not going to be serious until the pilots get this behind them.
Well, of course you are opening "old wounds"...and you know it.
Let's ponder some strategy, which means long term thinking.
USAPA is fighting tooth and nail for reversible error which is absolutely their right. So let's assume that in 12 months that the Ninth Circuit grants USAPA everything it wants as far as a new trial and remands the case for a new trial. What do you think will happen at a new trial, especially if Stephan Bradford is correctly served a subpoena for trial? What is going to happen when he has to testify and there is already a paper trail that will lock in his testimony about hos motivations in forming USAPA? Remember that there is documentation that at least partially establishes that it was to defeat Nicolau.
Now I am not trying to open up wounds here. I am suggesting that the expense of time, money and effort is likely futile.
Folks need to think ahead and, at the same time, realize that the company is not going to be serious until the pilots get this behind them.
Actually you are wrong. I am suggesting that folks think ahead and not in the moment. If that causes pain I am sorry, but it is not the intent.
hp, The west misconception is that USAPA was formed to get around the Nicolau award!
USAPA was formed for three major reasons:
1. Pension given away without a vote from the membership. Big mistake!
2. LOA93 has put this pilot group at the bottom of the industry in wages.
3. Nicolau Award windfall for the west.
Even if ALPA had fixed the Nic....... I still think they would have been voted off the island
I am suggesting that the expense of time, money and effort is likely futile.
SPECULATION- Show Spelled Pronunciation [spek-yuh-ley-shuhn]
conjectural consideration of a matter; conjecture or surmise: a report based on speculation rather than facts.
HYPOTHETICAL- Show Spelled Pronunciation [hahy-puh-thet-i-kuhl] Show highly conjectural; not well supported by available evidence.
I thought we talked about this before....didn't we?
maybe not....I know you said there was a difference, I guess I forgot what it was...(the difference, that is...)
I remember now!..."speculation" is BAD. "hypothetical" is GOOD.
Got it.
You mean the guys who will never upgrade at USAirways on the East now after 23+ years of continuous service to the company?...(under the Nic)....that kind of thinking ahead?
I hasten to point out that your amazement is not germaine to our internal issues. You buy a ticket on an airline...maybe LCC, maybe not. You arrive at your destination. The "who, what, when, where, why, and how" of how it happens are certainly areas of your concern. How we decide what is important to the pilots at this airline who are locked behind the door up front certainly is not. How much we spend in those determinations is not. Why we spend in those determinations is not.It NEVER ceases to amaze me that a group of people who are smart enough to fly huge pieces of aluminum through the sky at slightly less then the speed of sound can be so single mindedly stupid
Give Up you've LOST! All of you have lost.
The first guy on any list LOST
The Last guy on any list LOST
Total up the funds spent for lawyers on BOTH sides, add in the lost raises to date and kindly show me ONE pilot who will at age 60 or 65 come out with MORE money fighting each other instead of fighting the company. Use whatever seniority list you choose I defy you to show me one pilot who will gain as a result of this litigation regardless of income.
I know this is a technical point, but how can a pilot have 23+ years of continuous service at a company that has only existed 3+ years?