Agreed.
And, to those who are going to say AMFA is proving something, let’s see what you’ve proved so far.
* That AMFA’s leadership is only interested in being democratic when it suits their purposes (e.g. not putting Northwest’s last pre-strike offer out to vote)
* That with enough preparation, companies can call a union’s bluff when it comes to strikes (NWA rewrote the union-busting playbook, and you can bet nearly every other company with an organized workforce is going to try some variation of this)
* That no matter how many times you repeat something, it doesn’t make it true (e.g. the dire predictions of Northwest’s impending shutdown, disastrous crash, etc.)
* That AMFA members don’t have the ability to think for themselves
I could go on, but the point is that AMFA and their membership thought they could shut NWA down and that eventually they would back on “easy street†making the same or more than before. Instead, Northwest is still operating, and 90% of AMFA’s membership permanently lost their jobs. I’m not going to make any long-term predictions about NWA’s future (they still have a lot of problems to solve), but, as I’ve stated before, AMFA’s actions hurt their membership and quite possibly organized labor as a whole.
Don't you get it? Northwest would have pulled something with the last clause of the contract that says they basically reserve the right to change the contract at any time.
AMFA's leadership has always been interested in being democratic. That last pre-strike proposal would have never had a chance of passing, since A: %53 of people are not going to vote themselves out of a job, and B: especially not with a %92 strike vote. They presented this proposal because they realized it may very well be the final proposal, and people had been complaining and SCABBING because they never got to vote, even though most have said they would have voted no. All they're trying to do is try and come up with an excuse for what they've done because they know it's wrong.
Yep. NWA was the test run for this, and because the other unions didn't support them, even though AMFA said that if NWA succeeds in beating them, they're next.
And lookee here, everybody else is on the chopping block.
You're right, no matter how many times you say something, that doesn't make it true. But I firmly believe it is only a matter of time before an NWA plane augers in, because they have maintenance outsourced to foreign countries where there is virtually no oversight, the mechanics don't have A&P licences, and don't have an interest in the safety and continued success of the airline. And the people they have inside NWA are people with absolutely no integrity.
The statistics for the Alaska Airlines outsourcing of ground work, and the increase from ground handling incidents, from 15 or so in 2004 to 70 some in 2005 when the outsourced the work. (Yes, I know ground work and maintenance aren't the same thing)
AMFA membership can't think for themselves? How do you explain that one?
The majority of the AMFA membership figured they were in for the long haul, they knew it wasn't going to be easy, and I think they knew in the back of their minds that they might not succeed.
Northwest is operating, but the planes are getting worse and worse, the on time numbers are still piss poor, even though they have parked alot of planes and reduced their schedule.
"Easy Street"? AMFA was willing to give up a paycut, maybe even a few job losses, to keep this from going to a strike. NWA wanted them out, even after AMFA put forth a proposal that would have met their target for cost savings.
AMFA hurt the organized labor movement? How do you figure that? They did the only thing a labor union could do. Withhold their services and strike. You don't think NWA hurt the labor movement more with their new union busting playbook, that as you say "you can bet nearly every other company with an organized workforce is going to try some variation of this"
There are three things that have really hurt the labor movement in America:
#1: Laws that make outsourcing easy, and a president that openly advocates it.
#2: SCAB's, and the fact that we are one of the only industrialized countries in the world that allows workers on strike to be permanently replaced. If there weren't any SCAB's, especially the AMFA members that crossed their own line, the strike would be over by now, because they couldn't get all the people they neede to hire on permanently. Until just recently, NWA had ads in the newspaper looking for people with
NO experience.
#3: The fact that none of the other union's supported them. The PFAA said: if we strike they'll replace us. Now NWA is planning on replacing all FA's on foreign flights. The pilots wanted to keep their huge pensions. But what's to stop NWA from doing the same thing to them as the FA's? The IAM said "AMFA has never supported an IAM picket line." This is an out and out lie, and AMFA has the proof. All they're interested in is getting paid with dues money, and SCABBING. Rumor has it that Bobby DePace (President of IAM District 143 himself) was a SCAB at Eastern in the '80s.
End Transmission...