I do think the election is going to be close. It is really going to be up to the NW f/a's as we don't know their percentages for pro-contract vs. no contract. I think, for the most part, the DL 40% will vote for representation again. NW f/a's must come thru at a near 80% for representation in order for it to pass. NW has never been without a union, so their f/a's will be faced with that question and opportunity for the first time.
And although I am for a legal and binding contract, I must say that AFA must step up their game, be even more accountable to their members, process grievances in the timeliest manner possible and be as transparent in the process as they can going forward.
Strategically, as far as this campaign is concerned, I think waiting for a labor-friendly head to the NMB is wise but they should also illuminate the good contracts their members have negotiated like Alaska's.
I know, for me, with the downturn in the economy, I want that $43 being put to the best use possible. If I have a conflict with Scheduling, I would want it (the grievance) addressed ASAP. If it's not, I want to know why not.
PS: If Delta was still run by the kind of team made up of Mr. Dave Garrett and Mr. Hollis Harris, rather than those doing the bidding of the greedy hedge fund Wall St. types, I would most likely not feel the need for a union.