freedom said:
CAPS KEY SI STUCK AGAIN
AND WHAT IF THE PRE-STRIKE VOTE FAILS OR IS PROVEN TO BE WEAK ? 50/50
I think AH already has that built in. To be sure, that is the fear of the current leaders but the question must be put to the test and things must be allowed to fall where they may since management already has a piss clam strike vote built into its proposals. AH is calling bluff. I think he is wrong about fleet service, and plenty wrong.
I think that you incite the strike vote with AH's ridiculous proposal and you actively campaign to get what is needed for the interest of the members. To do that, the NC must reach out beyond it's inner circle. To be sure, I'll definitely campaign against a ridiculous proposal and strongly for a big strike vote. We were very successful in a big and strong strike vote at United involving members who were still non contract and non dues payers. The same strategies can be employed at US AIRWAYS regarding a strike vote.
In this situation, the membership can't afford to vote against strike. It would be game over and forever forget about even a 1% pay raise. But for sure, AH is calling bluff. He needs to hear from his employees instead of Joe Tiberi. All parties should give fleet service more credit.
AH is reading this forum, I have a hunch what his handle is. I wouldn't be surprised if his proposal gets tweaked and brought back to the IAM. If not, then he risk it being aired in the streets. I would have snatched that last proposal quick as heck and dragged it in the streets before he had a chance to enhance it. If he doesn't enhance that, should the IAM change gears and exploit it, then, in a twisted way, it may be better if AH gives us a second chance to 'behead' his proposal.
At some point, the IAM has to learn how to manufacture the consent and use the proper techniques to exploit management. But I can assure you, due to the internet and information highway, Joe Tiberi's voice isn't really being heard by anyone at this point. IMO, it looks like management has left itself open for exploitation and we can dress them up as clowns by fanning that ridiculous 1% proposal.
Also, preparing for the stock holders meeting ought to have the IAM putting out that proposal to the stock holders, in the meeting, with a spokesperson standing up and sounding off about it in the 2 minute guaranteed open mic for any stockholder on record.