I know I am going to start a whole new rash of "Jester is really Tim" comments, but maybe I am missing something... given United FSAs are a much larger group than US, and I understand both groups will be voting in the same election, does anyone realistically think any US 5 candidate ticket would sweep the election for the 5 open positions? Am I missing something or are my assumptions wrong?
It seems like a politically savy move to recognize a US sweep to be highly unlikely given the numbers, and to obtain a simple majority would be huge victory, especially if its leader (Tim) so strongly desires to be elected. In many ways, it is very much like a coalition government formed as found through most of the democratic governments around the world. In this case we have the United candidates, correct? We have IAM Rising (are they all US candidates?) and we have Tim's mixed group? Is that the dynamics or are their other parties, as I am not in-tune with all the politcal groupings. This deal making are all part of the political process in democratic government outside of the duopoly environment of the American system. To simply say, it is "selling out" the US members suggest we ignore the reality of the UA voters who are a sizable majority of the electorate. Maybe we need to change the rules as to who can vote in what elections, but that's not the situation of this coming election.
Also I agree with Tim... updates with hefty doses of campaigning should be avoided, even though I can understand the temptation. Might I suggest a better approach would be urge the members to be invovled in the election process as part of the solidarity and to consider the carefully candidates and their qualifications (implication being that Charlie Brown is genius and Tim sucks).