blue collar
Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 17, 2008
- Messages
- 1,241
- Reaction score
- 901
Yeah. The silence will be deafening.Tim Nelson said:700 just doesnt want to admit.
Yeah. The silence will be deafening.Tim Nelson said:700 just doesnt want to admit.
Once again you make it about me.737823 said:You responded once before saying "not my district" to CLTRat when he asked if he should trust the DL 141 leadership.
http://www.airlineforums.com/topic/56294-novdec-2013-fleet-service-discussion/?p=1048353
http://www.airlineforums.com/topic/56294-novdec-2013-fleet-service-discussion/?p=1049032
Josh
It's happening, exactly how I said. If these idiots bring back something less than even what AMR makes, and didn't get any more scope, then they will get EATEN ALIVE. The contract may pass but these guys are done even in the US AIRWAYS hubs. Whatever the case, I think the members are entitled to see the proposal but I think the NC ought to have recommended a rejection. All that talk about scope and all it was, was wind.wikileaks said:Negotiations Update.... The company has moved on wages, they are now offering mid $22 for top scale also an extra week of vacation, a couple of extra holidays and full sick pay for time used. However they are not willing to budge on SCOPE. As far as back pay goes the company is only willing to pay back-pay from the date of merger closing not since the contract became amendable. The negatiating team is not ready to accept this offer just yet, they need a little more. IMO the IAM needs to fight for full back pay like what UA employees got.
I agreed to stay out of the AMFA topics, but I still like engaging with fleet. As you tell others don't like it don't read it, place me on ignore.700UW said:Once again you make it about me.
When did you work for US?
When were you an IAM member?
yes it does very much, he's part of the same crew to say otherwise is just dishonest.blue collar said:Rat's dues money goes towards klemm's pay. I'd say it concerns him.
Then stop with the lies and misinformation.737823 said:I agreed to stay out of the AMFA topics, but I still like engaging with fleet. As you tell others don't like it don't read it, place me on ignore.
Josh
I'm going to put you on ignore. You are a child and utterly ridiculous. Have a nice day.700UW said:Why dont you admit you lied about calling people names?
So why dont you keep your campaign of the boards?
wikileaks said:Negotiations Update.... The company has moved on wages, they are now offering mid $22 for top scale also an extra week of vacation, a couple of extra holidays and full sick pay for time used. However they are not willing to budge on SCOPE. As far as back pay goes the company is only willing to pay back-pay from the date of merger closing not since the contract became amendable. The negatiating team is not ready to accept this offer just yet, they need a little more. IMO the IAM needs to fight for full back pay like what UA employees got.
So much for not calling names, lol.Tim Nelson said:I'm going to put you on ignore. You are a child and utterly ridiculous. Have a nice day.
No movement because of cinderella dates or no movement because it isn't being enhanced?Kev3188 said:No movement on Scope is a deal breaker, IMO. That offer should be dead before it even leaves the room.
what scope is the company trying to push?.....TWU AA scope? i assumed scope was not on the table.Kev3188 said:
No movement on Scope is a deal breaker, IMO. That offer should be dead before it even leaves the room.