What's new

2014 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
By afterwards I meant the completion of the wager, which the likes of "you'se" clearly aren't up to. Feel free to continue perpetually drooling on both "you'se" bib and keyboard now.
dca319 said:
 
I can only wonder why even the most pathetic, or even possible excuse for a person, much less supposed "pilot", could ever possibly, and both so energetically and vehemently, insist on presenting themselves as such a complete joke. Even the most remote concept of self respect must be entirely foreign to "you'se". Dismissed.
 
EastUS1 said:
By afterwards I meant the completion of the wager, which the likes of "you'se" clearly aren't up to. Feel free to continue perpetually drooling on both "you'se" bib and keyboard now.
 
I can only wonder why even the most pathetic, or even possible excuse for a person, much less supposed "pilot", could ever possibly, and both so energetically and vehemently, insist on presenting themselves as such a complete joke. Even the most remote concept of self respect must be entirely foreign to "you'se". Dismissed.
 
Ahh little Persian, me thinks you are all bark and no bite.  Send your info now.
 
dca319 said:
 
Ahh little Persian, me thinks you are all bark and no bite.  Send your info now.
Again: The only info required would be the establishment and then completion of wagered conditions, for which no direct contact's at all required untill meeting for the wager. Seriously: No one could possibly be as utterly dense as "you'se" so routinely demonstrate, and even walk upright.
 
Methinks is one word, not two, and "you'se" don't, very clearly.
 
Again as well: I can only wonder why even the most pathetic, or even possible excuse for a person, much less supposed "pilot", could ever possibly, and both so energetically and vehemently, insist on presenting themselves as such a complete joke. Even the most remote concept of self respect must be entirely foreign to "you'se".
 
EastUS1 said:
Again: The only info required would be the establishment and then completion of wagered conditions, for which no direct contact's at all required untill meeting for the wager. Seriously: No one could possibly be as utterly dense as "you'se" so routinely demonstrate, and even walk upright.
 
Methinks is one word, not two, and "you'se" don't, very clearly.
 
Again as well: I can only wonder why even the most pathetic, or even possible excuse for a person, much less supposed "pilot", could ever possibly, and both so energetically and vehemently, insist on presenting themselves as such a complete joke. Even the most remote concept of self respect must be entirely foreign to "you'se".
Again:  send me your phone number and street address.
 
cltrat said:
never has anyone ever work so hard to prove themselves as frauds
 
Well sir; in all fairness..that's true only if we leave out politics and religion here. 😉
 
dca319 said:
Again:  send me your phone number and street address.
 
For what possible reason? Explain "you'se" self. Nothing at all prevents meeting at a designated place and time per the wager. All details can easily be worked out online here, via PM. The first being to address specific terms, and the mutual depositing of funds to an agreeable third party, only by contract to be released to the victor upon completion of the wager, or forfeiture thereof through a no-show. I do realize "you'se" are just some joke of a "spartan", desperate for entirely unearned attention, but that's how it would be worked out, were I dealing with an actual human being here.
 
For my best wishes towards your personal growth, if such is at all ever even possible to hope for; I'll leave "you'se" with this again: I can only wonder why even the most pathetic, or even possible excuse for a person, much less supposed "pilot", could ever possibly, and both so energetically and vehemently, insist on presenting themselves as such a complete joke. Even the most remote concept of self respect must be entirely foreign to "you'se".
 
 

Eric Auxier said
July 20, 2008 @ 12:59 am
Petes2cents: On the surface, it sounds terrible. But here’s the real story, which I am attempting to get published in the USA Today:
 
 
As a multi-year Captain for USAirlines, I profusely apologize to the public for the misleading full page advertisement by our new “union,” USAPA, in the USA Today this week.
 
This ad was nothing more than attempt at muscle-flexing by an upstart union trying to turn safety into a negotiating tactic.
 
This “union,” of which nearly all of our fellow West-based and many East-based pilots refuse to become members, has, in the scant few months of its existence, committed such foolhardy acts as:
1) Blatantly disregard and attempt to circumvent legally binding, preexisting arbitration;
2) Falsely accuse and sue members of its own pilot body, the entire case of which was thrown out of Federal Court last week as completely false and malicious;
3) attempt to force nonunion pilots to pay absurdly high union “dues” under threat of termination; and, in its USA Today advertisement;
3) defend a group of disgruntled pilots who are attempting to hurt our airline financially by unnecessarily ordering and burning extra fuel. This has been done by running unneeded engines on the ground during delays, and flying at absurdly inefficient speeds and altitudes.
 
I can speak with authority that our professional dispatchers do an outstanding job planning our flights with plenty of margin of fuel safety. Only rarely do I need to order and burn extra fuel, as these pilots who claim to be “professionals” have routinely done.
 
The public can rest assured that ALL of our USAirways pilots do indeed operate their aircraft in a safe manner, and the vast majority do so in an efficient manner as well. I do, however, fear for the Company’s future at the hands of a few loose cannons, both in the cockpit and in our sad excuse for a union, who dare to call their acts “professional.”
 
Signed,
A Concerned USAirways Captain
 
 
"The ALPA TWA MEC Knowingly Waived the Arbitration
of Seniority Integration Issues
to Save the Jobs of TWA Pilots
AWRF is correct that, prior to the asset purchase, the collective bargaining agreement
between TWA and ALPA covering TWA pilots provided for the integration of seniority lists pursuant
to Sections 3 and 13 of the traditional Allegheny-Mohawk Labor Protective Provisions (“LPPs”),
9 Allegheny-Mohawk Merger Case, 59 CAB 22 (1972).
15
which contemplated third-party arbitration of a seniority list integration.9 However, ALPA’s TWA
MEC knowingly waived those provisions to permit the purchase to go forward and to preserve the
TWA pilots’ jobs.
It is indisputable that, at the time American announced its offer to purchase assets of TWA
and offer employment to TWA’s employees in January 2001, TWA was in extremis – only hours
away from a complete shutdown -- which would have left TWA’s pilots and other employees
unemployed. It is also indisputable that, at that time, American Airlines was the only suitor proposing
to purchase more than piecemeal assets of TWA (but no employees) and to offer continued
employment to TWA’s pilots and other employees. This dire state of affairs was repeatedly made
clear by TWA management at the time of the transaction:"
NMB, the american pilots are at it again.  We will keep the public informed about the past and the present.
 
http://www.alliedpilots.org/Public/Archive/TWA/nmbpositionstmt.pdf
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top