That does raise an interesting question...how is the best way to distribute the money collected from the members...and non-members/objectors. Would it be appropriate to do it "even-Steven", even though that may be the easiest? The argument for that with profit-sharing is that everyone has contributed an equal amount of effort...therefore an equal share. But that is not the case of dues payment...so should therefore not be the case with dues refund. And non-members, members in bad-standing and/or objectors...they paid in something if even a smaller amount than members in-good-standing, should they not receive a pro-rated amount of the available funds? (forget the C&BL's...they will mean nothing in court). Perhaps determine the amount that everyone would have paid had they become and maintained member in-good-standing prior to USAPA's dissolution and pro-rate the refund on that amount...less any amount they still owe. I know...not the easiest calculation but would seem the best to avoid further lawsuits.
