nycbusdriver
Veteran
From an article by Terry Maxon of the Dallas News, January 23, 2014:
Are you unaware that this was the DAMAGES phase of the trial in which your organization was alread found guilty in a court of law? It doesn't matter whether you admit guilt or now. You're guilty by rule of law.
--------------------------------------------
Now...before the usual suspects start quoting the Addington I, remember that by the rule of law that trial never took place. We will never know if any appeal on the merits of Addington I would uphold the jury verdict. It's moot. Addington II spoke to that anyway when Judge Silver ruled that there was no DFR. Go back to your sandbox and play with yourselves.
Dear Captain Moak:After a six-week trial in 2011, a jury found ALPA guilty of its DFR obligations. The trial to establish damages was set to begin March 17.
Allen Press, lead counsel whose St. Louis law firm took over the pilots’ case in 2006, said the settlement was a fair one that will put money in hands of ex-TWA employees hurt after the 2001 takeoff of TWA.
“We’re very pleased to accomplish something meaningful for a large group of pilots that really suffered as a result of that merger, and we’re pleased by that,” Press said.
ALPA president Lee Moak said ALPA’s decision to settle the case “is in no way an admission of guilt.”
Are you unaware that this was the DAMAGES phase of the trial in which your organization was alread found guilty in a court of law? It doesn't matter whether you admit guilt or now. You're guilty by rule of law.
--------------------------------------------
Now...before the usual suspects start quoting the Addington I, remember that by the rule of law that trial never took place. We will never know if any appeal on the merits of Addington I would uphold the jury verdict. It's moot. Addington II spoke to that anyway when Judge Silver ruled that there was no DFR. Go back to your sandbox and play with yourselves.