2014 Pilot Discussion

[luvthe9]

You sure sound a lot like DCA319 and/or MoveToCLT.  Yet another alias?

Thinking the same thing.

 

[AAviator]

 
 
You don't understand "implicit assumption" yet.  But you appear to be guilty of it none the less.  Answer your own question... "Who has to affirm the Nic?... and How would it be affirmed?

I google "implicit assumption" and came up with this :
 
https://www.boundless.com/psychology/definition/implicit-assumptions/
 
Ok, so maybe I'm an idiot…  Who has to "affirm" the NIC?
 
Your turn…  (I know I already asked that question)

 

[AAviator]

Thinking the same thing.

I pushed the mommy button at the bottom of your post and here's a copy and paste of what I wrote in the report box:
 
 
Hello moderator.  Please visit this post and confirm that I am not any of the posters mentioned in the earlier posts.  If you can, please confirm publicly that this the one and only user name associated with the IP, computer and e-mail provider, and any other measure you may use to accomplish such proof.
 
thank you.

 

[luvthe9]

I agree.  If his/her DOH would allow WB captain, then that is where he/she should be after the SLI.
 
I can't see any possibility of fences between east and west once the SLI is in place.  That would make no sense because, as you say, AAL is merging with LCC, not US and AW.

I agree with your first line but not the second, if APA comes back to the table anything can be negotiated and agreed to by both sides otherwise we will wind up going MB and yes they can put fences if they want to, anything goes in arbitration.


AA PLEASE RESPOND TO MY POST 5407.

 

[luvthe9]

I pushed the mommy button at the bottom of your post and here's a copy and paste of what I wrote in the report box:
 
 
Hello moderator.  Please visit this post and confirm that I am not any of the posters mentioned in the earlier posts.  If you can, please confirm publicly that this the one and only user name associated with the IP, computer and e-mail provider, and any other measure you may use to accomplish such proof.
 
thank you.

won't do any good and we really don't care either. The west has several guys that have multiple screen names, you can sign on over at a neighbors or relatives place or on the road this is entertainment.

 

[AAviator]

........FOR AA DO YOU AGREE WITH THIS....I think you are missing the boat, I say this being our sixth merge 99% of the east pilots respect DOH we do not want your jobs or big airplanes, hard to believe but true we should not bump any of you and your big planes should be for you guys, it's what you brought to this merge.
 
 
I have no problem with this…  You run what you brung.
 
 
 
 
 
That is what the east thinks the west on the other hand think they should get all your premium flying and go right to the top.
 
 
I accept the NIC.   You run what you brung, and we run what we brung.
 
Don't make your fight our fight.

hows that regarding you wanting me to answer this post?

 

[AAviator]

won't do any good and we really don't care either. The west has several guys that have multiple screen names, you can sign on over at a neighbors or relatives place or on the road this is entertainment.

I'm a moderator on another forum.  I can tell by various ways of who's a troll and who isn't.  They can..  Trust me.

 

[EastUS1]

Ok, so maybe I'm an idiot… 

 
Even the first small steps towards self-awareness are always a fine thing to see happen in any person.

 

[EastUS1]

  Trust me.

 
 
I'll pass.

 

[EastUS1]

I google "implicit assumption" and came up with this :
 

 
You actually needed to google it? Seriously? 😉

 

[AAviator]

I thought I knew what binding arbitration meant too.
 
Such substance from you guys..
 
Every study disorganized enemies?

 

[EastUS1]

I thought I knew what binding arbitration meant too.

 
No worries there. Everyone makes mistakes at times.

 

[EastUS1]

Every study disorganized enemies?

 
I assume that was intended as "ever", and yes, more than you can likely imagine. Thanks for clarifying your AA outlook on this wonderfully happy marriage though = "enemies". Given that; feel perfectly free to continue sucking up to your supposed friends in "sparta", who (however amazingly) haven't figured that last part/"enemies" out yet.

 

[AAviator]

 
I assume that was intended as "ever", and yes, more than you can likely imagine. Thanks for clarifying your AA outlook on this wonderfully happy marriage though = "enemies".

No, it was just an attempt to get you to realize what you're bringing to the table………………...
 
But then again, rational, factual conversation can't be found here.
p.s. and no, I haven't changed my position if PI Brat is lurking..  I think AA would be better off without LCC.

 

[EastUS1]

No, it was just an attempt to get you to realize what you're bringing to the table………………...
 
But then again, rational, factual conversation can't be found here.

 
1) The APA seems clearly intent on attempting yet another complete abuse of a pilot group. No surprise there. Thanks for being too stupid to even conversationally cloak your intent..."enemies"....
2) Most certainly not from the likes of yourself anyway.
 
Again; feel free to pretend yourself a great "friend" of the west, versus them being bluntly stated "enemies", and good luck keeping them as gullible as they currently are for very long at all.
 
"p.s. and no, I haven't changed my position if PI Brat is lurking..  I think AA would be better off without LCC." That sounds like a purely personal problem. Run to Parker and company and explain your distress. I've no doubt they'll change their minds immediately. If you've no instant success there; try another approach you're more familiar with, ie: "I pushed the mommy button..." 😉