Question for the often wrong and misinformed DELETED BY MODERATOR.
In the Article you linked saying UAL was not going to make the ATSB threshold and UA was lookin to cut retiree benefits (adding cost of coverage). Could you not surmise that the UAL mgmnt. team is identifying all the cost that are available to cut while in Bk. Much harder to get these cuts when not reorganizing. In fact this is the perfect time to do all the house cleaning and review of all the cost. If you want you can read the USA Today article again and it details that unlike UAL, U spent too little time reorganizing and is paying the price now. Just look to the AGAA deals. In Ch11 they might have had an easier time of it. Instead they were fighting over a barrel to get the deal done.
On the omnibus issue: Why not lock in a schedule for Jude Wedenoff? Take you best dates and lock them in. As I understand the banks are happy with the loan projections and any addtional cuts by cost within the company are toward the bottom line.
You also said UAL was cutting the MIA domicile to better the bottom line. If you would care to read the entire report you will find some interesting information. While MIA will close a domicile there were only 88 pilots based there and about 200 F/A's. With only GRU and EZE as base depts. and AA increasing MIA service it made sense to move the EZE flight to ORD (rumored for many months) and use the GRU aircraft for the new ZRH service. This allows for total evening of the flights offered. The MIA domestic service will not change as most of the SA flights were O and D traffic.
UAL has already cancelled non-hub Intl service since 9/11. BOS-LHR and EWR-LHR are two that come to mind. Redeploy the assests to the hubs and increase the feed and revenue per ticket. If you look at the financial results this has been accomplished as the revenue has outpaced the industry for the most part.
Finally, While UAL's future is not without hurdles they are significantly different from those faced by US Air. Do you not believe the UAL avvocato's are not selling this to the ATSB? You say that if U does not survive then UAL's loan app. could be rejected because of a default. However, in the article you link, Siegel, says he will sell assests and liquidate to pay the loan. So if the loan is repayed why would that hurt UAL? Also the other airlines that have received loans appear to be paying back and doing OK. Do local banks stop loaning money to homebuyers when one person defaults on a loan? NO. Each application is taken independently.
While I have many friends that work for U and I hope for there sake U survives and prospers, in its own right. For you I have trouble working up that desire. The "youre wrong, I am right" attitude you have does not allow for a true debate of the issue. The picture that comes to me when I read your replies is that you are standing at your computer with you hands over your ears while casting your mantra of "youre wrong, I am right, nah nah nah".
To all at U good luck. except to DELETED BY MODERATOR.......£$%%&&(*&^ (i feel better now)