Phoenix
Veteran
- Joined
- Apr 16, 2003
- Messages
- 8,584
- Reaction score
- 7,430
US Airways PHL Council 41 Update - August 16, 2007
:angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry:
B Scale Effort for B scale Pay - There is no excuse for giving over 86%.
Dear Philadelphia Pilots,
The following is a very important CBS message. Make sure you are in full compliance each and every flight.
Date: Thursday, 9 August 2007 14:39 ET
To: USAALLALL.PLT
From: LULKOVICH.T
Subject: Exterior Preflight Inspections
Recently, we have had several crews that have found or who have been aware of aircraft damage and not followed the FOM to have maintenance address the issue before taking the aircraft on the next flight. It is very important that all aircraft damage or maintenance irregularities be evaluated by maintenance before the aircraft is flown. As a reminder, no matter how insignificant the damage may appear, by FAR, pilots are not authorized or qualified to ascertain the extent of damage or tolerance limit. In one instance, the damage was out of limits and had to be repaired before the aircraft could be put back iinto revenue service.
The FOM gives pilots guidance in paragraph 8.3.4 copied below:
If damage is discovered during the exterior preflight inspection, check to see if yellow/gray paint has been placed by the damage. If yellow/gray paint is not present, check to see if the damage has been recorded in the FDML. If it is not recorded in the FDML, contact Maintenance Control prior to making a write-up.
Thank you in advance for your diligence in this matter.
Captain Tom Lulkovich
Director - Flight Safety & Regulatory Compliance
Follow the three prong approach, Fly safe, Family First, and SAP down for quality of life.
Fraternally,
Eric Rowe
Dave Ciabattoni
Jim Portale
US Airways ALPA BOS MEC F/O Rep. Update - "You'll know what to do." - August 16,2007
BOS Pilots,
Our campaign to reach Pay Parity, as a first step in reaching equivalent value contracts, is now underway.
Additionally, our Pay Parity Resolution (copied below) puts the Company on notice that as of Sept. 1, 2007, if pay parity has not been established, retro pay, with 8% interest, will be owed this pilot group.
This is our fight, and at the moment our fight alone. The West MEC has stated that they will do all they can to stop the Company from bringing us up to pay parity with them, and Parker has said that he's not interested in doing so.
I say it's time to change his mind.
Is it going to be a fight? You bet it will, because "doing the right thing" is only for children's books. In the adult world, there is no "right thing" for those who want your money except for them to keep it.
This fight is now yours. Your MEC has drawn a line in the sand on the Nicolau Award, and it will never be implemented on this property. Your MEC had now drawn a line in the sand on Pay Parity, and we will be relying on you to deliver that message, loud and clear, to Doug Parker.
Why you? Because it's your pay raise. So everyday that you go to work, remember that you're working for far less than your West counterparts, and both they and Parker want to keep it that way. And after you remind yourself of this, in the words of George Patton, "you'll know what to do."
In solidarity,
Garland
CC: MEC
Enclosures: MEC Chairman's Letter and Resolution
Garland is quite the union guy now that USAPA is breathing down his neck. Does "equal pay" include the EM190 that is replacing Group II?
Nevermind equal pay, how about "equal hotels". Lets watch the MEC and EC only stay in the same hotels that are called for by the contracts that they sign for the line swine. :down: