NYer
Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2010
- Messages
- 4,167
- Reaction score
- 905
It was proposed by the association to remain at TOS at date of yearly increase.
What happens if all other groups have the same language?
It was proposed by the association to remain at TOS at date of yearly increase.
Not really. I would rather wait a months for a possible better offer than years without the possibility of one.
So the IAM and their NC will not allow anything that will harm their members to be T/A'd, while the TWU agreed to T/A an item that has the potential of negatively affecting many TWU members and is actually an item picked from the LUS side that is worse than LAA's. I personally don't use it much so it's not a deal breaker, but many folks do.
If I'm wrong, anyone feel free to correct me, I can handle it.
Trade hours do count toward the 40 hour qualifier for LAA. Do you know what happens at LUS if a pt employee is scheduled say 5 hours and then picks up a concurrent 5 hour shift for a total of 10 concurrent hours and then is held over by the company? Is that OT starting after the 10 hours or can they be held 3 hours at straight time because they are only scheduled 5 hours?
So you think that Delta or UA has that kanguage? Delta doesn’t have language and Ua currently doesn’t have it either.What happens if all other groups have the same language?
It isn't the CS that creates the short turn, it is the OT in conjunction with the CS that actually creates the short turn.
If there is a CS in the system that has 9 hours in between shifts and the Company holds me on OT after those hours were put in the system, then the OT is what created the shortfall of less than 7.5 hours to trigger the short turn.
It isn't the CS that creates the short turn, it is the OT in conjunction with the CS that actually creates the short turn.
If there is a CS in the system that has 9 hours in between shifts and the Company holds me on OT after those hours were put in the system, then the OT is what created the shortfall of less than 7.5 hours to trigger the short turn.
Trade hours up to 8 hours in a day count towards the daily qualifier. The first 3 hours of the trade would count towards the daily qualifier So hours offered by the COMPANY after the 8 would be OT premium rate. (The other 2 hours of trade are not offered by COMPANY ...therefore do not qualify for premium pay).Trade hours do count toward the 40 hour qualifier for LAA. Do you know what happens at LUS if a pt employee is scheduled say 5 hours and then picks up a concurrent 5 hour shift for a total of 10 concurrent hours and then is held over by the company? Is that OT starting after the 10 hours or can they be held 3 hours at straight time because they are only scheduled 5 hours?
+1Section 6 doesn't have timeframes so it could be years rather than months.
Yes, I have read the TA...it was a couple of years ago though...and it is worse...I was actually arguing against part of the language with the gentleman that shared it with me...if it was the exact language we wanted of course it would be better within the contract...unfortunately it isn’t...
Perhaps when you attain enough seniority to hold Mon/Tue off you'll be able to enjoy those holidays
Section 6 doesn't have timeframes so it could be years rather than months.
So you think that Delta or UA has that kanguage? Delta doesn’t have language and Ua currently doesn’t have it either.
But to entertain the idea......if UA gets that language I’d be ecstatic. Because we would pass them on our increase date then they would pass us on their increase date then we would pass them on our next increase date And so on and so on .......
The CS I’m speaking is the next morning...whether or not the OT the night before causes it...in DFW for years it was paid along with “all hours worked” that day...now they don’t pay either because it is not your “regular” shift...so they claim...the funny part is that same language in “holidays”, means a totally different thing...”all hours worked”, is all hours worked...
Yes, the CS is in the next morning. The key in the argument, for us, is that the CS was in the system and they could have checked to avoid the short-turn. If they do not check then they pay the penalty but the CS has to be in the system prior to the OT being given.
Usually, in that scenario, it is an AM person that picked up a PM shift with the OT added on the back end.