ok, so what were the constants that the company never enhanced/budged on for each public proposal? lus insurance and catering.
and, profit sharing?
ok, add the lus insurance and some scope and tell me if it adds up to the potential of the company paying hundreds of millions per year in profit sharing and/or, the possibility of aa working regionals in hubs?
my personal feeling is that the company is close with wages/401k, bit further off on scope...though i feel the lavs part is ridiculous and the company will relent. the laa guys i know are more than ok with the wages, i'm the one who wants too much ($32.50/hr without differential on DOS, TOS of $36/hr without differential).
hopefully, the company will further sweeten their public and private proposal.
for a vote, it's not my opinion or an lus agent's opinion. weaasles talks about an insurance compromise. what if there is no insurance compromise. will the iam part of the assoc. allow this to come to a vote?
you say it's 50-50? i'd say if the iam assoc. big-shooters are confident that they can sell to their rank & file the trade-off of the insurance for the money, then we'll get a vote.
if not, laa will grumble that they (lus iam) went from $20/hr to potentially all of us at TOS $35.50/hr, but due to the insurance issue, we're stuck in the mud and could possibly lose more.