RJcasualty
Advanced
- Jun 29, 2004
- 187
- 67
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
RJcasualty said:
AirLUVer said:McCaskill-Bond was more due to APFA than APA. The TWA pilots got some feathering, versus the complete staple job of the FA group.
Obviously, you are clueless.nycbusdriver said:Yes. I stand corrected.
How did the Air Cal merger go with the APA?
... and hence the birth of McCaskill-Bond. While APA has the numbers, USAPA has the law. Both unions will be steering carefully through un-chartered DFR-infested waters. Navigation hazards include the floating relic of ALPA's DFR loss to TWA pilots. The defiant tone of Mr Mach is an example of what USAPA can expect down the road. DP must be giggling.Mach85ER said:Obviously, you are clueless.
Here's how it went.
APA placed the Aircal pilots on the list based on their seats and current flying.
It was a fair plan right up to the point where AA eliminated ALL of Aircals flying, but kept the pilots. APA pilots basically said " never again".
Reno Air came along. APA said "no way" to relative merge, especially where every one of their pilots was hired after our furloughed pilots from 1992-1993. They got stapled. Good move since again, AA eliminated all of the former Reno flying.
TWA came along, and obviously with "baggage". This included a significant amount of short haul former Ozark flying that long since went to Eagle much to the chagrin of the AA pilots. TWA pilots wanted a relative merge of lists. APA said "no way", and stapled some, but protected many in their STL hub. If AA had kept a modest hub in STL, the TWA would have enjoyed the earliest upgrades in the AA system. It didn't happen and AA sheet canned the flying like Aircal and Reno. Some TWA guys feel that despite this, they deserve their original TWA DOH. Most APA pilots feel differently.
Again, you seem rather uninformed. Feel free to enlighten me if you have any better info. Feel free to retract your statement.
Mach85ER said:Again, you seem rather uninformed. Feel free to enlighten me if you have any better info. Feel free to retract your statement.
eolesen said:Sounds like USAPA refusing to accept the reality that they soon will cease to exist...