April/May 2013 Pilot Discussion

[Bill Brasky]

The order signed by the judge matchs the filing by the west.

This is simple even you should understand.

You are either to stupid to to get it or to hard headed to admit you are wrong.

Itis the usapa filing that did not use the entire name or both upper and lower case letters. No denying it usapa filed incorrectly.

If you can't see that or admit it you are a lost cause and not worth replying any more.

You're an IDIOT. and, you're wrong. You just won't admit it. You know, it really doessn't matter whether I'm wrong or not, even though I'm not. What matters is that THE JUDGE SAID YOU WERE WRONG. So get over it already. Just like you need to get over your obsession with the NIc, IT'S OVER.

You're a lying ####.

 

[cactusboy53]

You're an IDIOT. and, you're wrong. You just won't admit it. You know, it really doessn't matter whether I'm wrong or not, even though I'm not. What matters is that THE JUDGE SAID YOU WERE WRONG. So get over it already. Just like you need to get over your obsession with the NIc, IT'S OVER.

You're a lying ####.

Oh Billy.....

Perhaps a new pair of ruby red shoes, Dorothy. You've clicked the ones you have so much to wish your way to DOH-land, they've worn out. Poor thing. Hurry, the twister's coming soon!!

Clear nails it. You, Claxon & Luvr (and others) keep repeating the same mindless stuff over and over (Ansett videos & ALPA updates from JMac & Stephan to name just a few) again while Clear, Res, Bean, Portly, Ames & others quote law & logic. It is not over yet, but it will be very soon.

Cue Claxon's ancient Ansett video here.............................Maroon.

 

[end_of_alpa]

The order signed by the judge matchs the filing by the west.

This is simple even you should understand.

You are either to stupid to to get it or to hard headed to admit you are wrong.

Itis the usapa filing that did not use the entire name or both upper and lower case letters. No denying it usapa filed incorrectly.

If you can't see that or admit it you are a lost cause and not worth replying any more.

From what I can tell both USAPA and AwFOL did not use the full captioning required under the rule. From the Judges order it sounds like he is not going to let anyone use the court for slop filings just because there is no merit to the complaint. This is just going to be another wasted AwFOL adventure in motions pleadings and lost causes. It won't get thrown out until at least this fall, which gives AwFOL time to file appeals, as usual.

AwFOL is going to continue filing until the court sanctions them for frivolous filings. Marty and Andy are now using the court system to prevent AwFOL from filing malpractice claims against the firm as a showing of doing everything they can for their clients. Another losing lawfirm.

 

[end_of_alpa]

Oh Billy.....

Perhaps a new pair of ruby red shoes, Dorothy. You've clicked the ones you have so much to wish your way to DOH-land, they've worn out. Poor thing. Hurry, the twister's coming soon!!

Clear nails it. You, Claxon & Luvr (and others) keep repeating the same mindless stuff over and over (Ansett videos & ALPA updates from JMac & Stephan to name just a few) again while Clear, Res, Bean, Portly, Ames & others quote law & logic. It is not over yet, but it will be very soon.

Cue Claxon's ancient Ansett video here.............................Maroon.

Your right on one point only. It will be over for AwFOL as you say. It is just going to be a very slow and painful death. You're right also about the mindless stuff. You lost, get over it. SYIC.

 

[luvthe9]

If you're talking about me, I'm not ticked at all; just trying to bring you guys back to reality. I also don't think it's going to be a three list deal. It's going to be USAPA's DOH + C&Rs and APA's list. Don't like it, too bad.

Good luck with that, they don't seem to like reality, and your right on with the lists.

 

[MUTATIS MUTANDIS]

Try to take a little off the billing from your inexplicable attorney's, you deserve it.

http://leonidas.cact..._Harper_ExA.pdf

It is legalzoom.com/ not legaldoom.com, awe those funny steal your identification guys! I know CLAX you tried to tell them! MM!

 

[cleardirect]

You're an IDIOT. and, you're wrong. You just won't admit it. You know, it really doessn't matter whether I'm wrong or not, even though I'm not. What matters is that THE JUDGE SAID YOU WERE WRONG. So get over it already. Just like you need to get over your obsession with the NIc, IT'S OVER.

You're a lying ####.

I have posted the facts for all to see. The filings are available for all to see.

It is you that is so intellectually dishonest that you can not admit when the evidence is in front of you.

I posted the facts, you posted false accusations.

You are a liar and can not admit when you are wrong. Further discussion with you is worthless since you can not be honest or accept responsibility for your errors.

IGNORE!

 

[Bill Brasky]

I have posted the facts for all to see. The filings are available for all to see.

It is you that is so intellectually dishonest that you can not admit when the evidence is in front of you.

I posted the facts, you posted false accusations.

You are a liar and can not admit when you are wrong. Further discussion with you is worthless since you can not be honest or accept responsibility for your errors.

IGNORE!

The Judge says you're wrong.

 

[cleardirect]

Yes they do. Your opinion is USAPA doesn't, but so far your "opinion", including those of your legal experts, have yet to disprove otherwise in the courts. Wide range of reasonableness, definition of seniority in the courts, only ALPA merger policy, unenforceable contract provisions, I can name many more. You have lost, YOU WILL CONTINUE TO LOSE. SYIC. Oh, and say high to McIlvenna and your AwFOL gang.

Which LUP has the company accepted?

If wide range of reasonableness was the answer why did not judge Silver not list that as the excuse? If that were a valid LUP she could have said usapa can use anything they want because of their wide range of reasonableness. She did not she wants a valid LUP.

Usapa has not given one. They threw out a lot of excuses during Addington I but those were all shot down.

Why is the company appealing the DJ if usapa can do whatever they want? If wide range is valid? The company right now has to determine if the LUP usapa gives is legal and valid. The company does not want the liability. Thus the appeal.

Wide range is not a valid LUP. Try again. Wide range is not a shield that can deflect all DFRs. Besides ignoring arbitration and imposing what a group wants is not within a wide range. It is unreasonable.

 

[Bill Brasky]

Which LUP has the company accepted?

If wide range of reasonableness was the answer why did not judge Silver not list that as the excuse? If that were a valid LUP she could have said usapa can use anything they want because of their wide range of reasonableness. She did not she wants a valid LUP.

Usapa has not given one. They threw out a lot of excuses during Addington I but those were all shot down.

Why is the company appealing the DJ if usapa can do whatever they want? If wide range is valid? The company right now has to determine if the LUP usapa gives is legal and valid. The company does not want the liability. Thus the appeal.

Wide range is not a valid LUP. Try again. Wide range is not a shield that can deflect all DFRs. Besides ignoring arbitration and imposing what a group wants is not within a wide range. It is unreasonable.

It's not up to the company to accept an LUP. She did not say that USAPA didn't have an LUP, she only said that your DFR claims are invalid if there is one, and I assure you, there are WAAAY more than one.

You're done. Go to your room and cry it off. While you're there, you can watch some old Perry Mason episodes and brush up on your legal skills that have gotten you so far.

No DFR for you!

I really do hope that you put me on ignore, so I don't have to read your stupid, nonsensical responses. Just embarasses yourself more.

 

[prechilill]

It's not up to the company to accept an LUP. She did not say that USAPA didn't have an LUP, she only said that your DFR claims are invalid if there is one, and I assure you, there are WAAAY more than one.

You're done. Go to your room and cry it off. While you're there, you can watch some old Perry Mason episodes and brush up on your legal skills that have gotten you so far.

Ok dude, just give us one LUP. Just one.
Oh, and the "you're done" comment... Comical buddy. If you think we are "done" then why the attempt to delay in Phoenix? LOL. You scabs are against the wall, bunch of cockroaches scurrying under the lights.

 

[prechilill]

Your right on one point only. It will be over for AwFOL as you say. It is just going to be a very slow and painful death. You're right also about the mindless stuff. You lost, get over it. SYIC.

Dude, you're funny. How do you explain USAPA's fear of litigating the west claim in Phoenix? A slow, painful death? No, it will be over quickly for USAPA, in a day, once APA takes over.

 

[GorgeousGeorge]

Dude, you're funny. How do you explain USAPA's fear of litigating the west claim in Phoenix? A slow, painful death? No, it will be over quickly for USAPA, in a day, once APA takes over.

You do know San Fancisco trumps Phoenix, always. What is AOL's fear in litigating in the court that actually already decided your dispute and will continue to do so?

 

[end_of_alpa]

Which LUP has the company accepted?

If wide range of reasonableness was the answer why did not judge Silver not list that as the excuse? If that were a valid LUP she could have said usapa can use anything they want because of their wide range of reasonableness. She did not she wants a valid LUP.

Usapa has not given one. They threw out a lot of excuses during Addington I but those were all shot down.

Why is the company appealing the DJ if usapa can do whatever they want? If wide range is valid? The company right now has to determine if the LUP usapa gives is legal and valid. The company does not want the liability. Thus the appeal.

Wide range is not a valid LUP. Try again. Wide range is not a shield that can deflect all DFRs. Besides ignoring arbitration and imposing what a group wants is not within a wide range. It is unreasonable.

But Dave, all unions have to have a LUP. The Supreme Court set the standard, NOT JUDGE SILVER! The company no longer has anything to do with it, in any case. The MOU supersedes the Transition agreement. It's over and YOU LOST! However, keep tilting at the windmills, and ....oh, SYIC!

 

[end_of_alpa]

Dude, you're funny. How do you explain USAPA's fear of litigating the west claim in Phoenix? A slow, painful death? No, it will be over quickly for USAPA, in a day, once APA takes over.

Dude, your incompetent. There is not one shred of fact in your post. Keep tilting at windmills, and, oh.....SYIC!