cactusboy53
Veteran
- Joined
- May 9, 2007
- Messages
- 2,649
- Reaction score
- 7,407
Our first peek at what is going on in the depositions? Guess there is some concern as to the money trail? And you have to love the description of the USAPA lawyer as being on a fishing expedition! USAPA is NOT the plaintiff here! And yet another "don't know nuthin’ about no grievance." Yet another denying knowledge of the biggest gaff in LEO history. LEO is in such disarray that they have their supposedly smartest guys off the reservation and stepping in it big time! So bad Cactus Boy says he does not even care. He is too busy laying out his outfit for the trial, wants to look his best in front of the Company! RR
What concerns (about a money trail)?
1 ALPA (our CBA) helped us go through ALPA merger policy.
2. Larger is 2 groups cries, calls out CIRP.
3. Larger group forces a representational election in the clear attempt to evade a final and binding seniority arbitration.
4. Smaller of two groups pays a law firm to protect our seniority rights from the larger bully.
5. Smaller group also forced to pay dues to new "union" (title used very loosely).
6. Smaller group fairing well against a DOH cram down; legal funds well spent.
7. Larger group legally not fairing as well.
8. Both groups have lost over nearly $800,000.00, to the company's gain.
We need a smiley grasping at a bale of hay for my buddy RR.