What's new

August 2013 Pilot Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.
Nic, I don’t know if it was the same for you in juvie, but at my house, about this time every year, the Sears Catalog would show up with the big toy section. My parents would say we had better pick one thing we really wanted, and that they would work a deal with Santa. Not a laundry list, but one really desired toy. Apparently Silver is a harsh mistress, as she not only told you could only try your DFR on ONE issue, but she picked it FOR you (whether the NIC not being in the MOU is a DFR.) If Marty thinks the trial he is preparing for is about your list above, he is going to be showing up in a Halloween costume to a Christmas party. Somebody better wake (no pun intended) him up and get him on the right track. And while you are at it, BEFORE the trial
, make sure he knows who the current elected president is at USAPA. He had a problem with that in DFRI. RR

I am not talking about the single issue DJ.
 
ClearDirect made an unexpected appearance on TV this morning.... it was unclear if he was referring to the Sec 22 grievance or the shift in opinion regarding the SLI. He took no followup questions and has once again disappeared into obscurity.

Jimmy Hoffa obscure:

cleardirect
Joined on May 24 2008 06:59 PM
Registered Member · 6234 posts

This member is no longer active.
 
Hey, anybody know whether or not the MDA pilots have had to pay on that grievance they lost years ago?

Also, who makes the decision to collect monies, say when the scab union drops a West grievance in violation of their DFR?
 
Jimmy Hoffa obscure:

cleardirect
Joined on May 24 2008 06:59 PM
Registered Member · 6234 posts

This member is no longer active.

Good for him.....

If he had not quit, he would have to come on here and tell the scabs how stupid their latest writ of 270 pages looks.

He pointed out scabmanski gave some false testimony to Silver, and guess what, similar false statements are in the writ's statement of facts. Perhaps he should have called them "statements of facts as only a scab union sees them while ignoring the actual historical
facts".
 
Hey, anybody know whether or not the MDA pilots have had to pay on that grievance they lost years ago?

Also, who makes the decision to collect monies, say when the scab union drops a West grievance in violation of their DFR?
Jurisdiction and authority. That is the real issue no matter what you want whether its a reservation at a restaurant or a 15 year pump on your seniority.
 
You'll get the Nic, served with a helping of fava beans and a nice chianti.

Will there be clowns for entertainment? Maybe that fat guy in the yellow raincoat can show - he's hilarious!

Will I get a cupcake for desert?

Can we go soon?

Will nic4us be pacing outside endlessly muttering to himself ' the only accepted list' spittle flying everywhere?

Will I get a tie tack to show everyone I was there?

Can I lecture my dinner companions about 'integrity' then get kicked for not honoring the terms of the bill?
 
I am not talking about the single issue DJ.

Say what? Is that you Marty? Addington II is what I am talking about, from the July USAPA update on document 122:

In short, the Court has decided:
  • the claim “actually” at issue in this case is whether USAPA breached the DFR by entering into an MOU that “does not require USAPA go into the McCaskill-Bond process with the Nicolau Award,”
  • there are potentially disputed issues of fact concerning this claim that can only be resolved through an evidentiary hearing, and
  • the hearing will be held on September 24 following an orderly process that gives all parties time to prepare their claims and defenses.
 
Hey, anybody know whether or not the MDA pilots have had to pay on that grievance they lost years ago?

Also, who makes the decision to collect monies, say when the scab union drops a West grievance in violation of their DFR?

Boy, you are on a roll (a bender?) tonight. Union pilots paying for losing grievances? Really? Did you just say that? I suggest you sit down and write yourself some notes on current legal affairs before posting any more. Marty, you seem to be having some excursions. Better take some aspirin in case there is a blockage. RR
 
Say what? Is that you Marty? Addington II is what I am talking about, from the July USAPA update on document 122:

In short, the Court has decided:
  • the claim “actually” at issue in this case is whether USAPA breached the DFR by entering into an MOU that “does not require USAPA go into the McCaskill-Bond process with the Nicolau Award,”
  • there are potentially disputed issues of fact concerning this claim that can only be resolved through an evidentiary hearing, and
  • the hearing will be held on September 24 following an orderly process that gives all parties time to prepare their claims and defenses.

Yes and if Marty is deposing people to dive into all the Nic4us whining then he deserves another donation from me!! 😀
 
Yes and if Marty is deposing people to dive into all the Nic4us whining then he deserves another donation from me!! 😀

Of course the best thing is for this entire affair to go away, as soon as possible. Maybe, but probably not, the Ninth will do just that. But to be honest, most of us are chomping at the bit to see this in court. I will be on vacation, I might just have to go out there in October to see it all go down. The quality of legal mumbo jumbo and mixed up cases you are seeing from Nic and CactusBoy is as good as it gets for them, no deeper. RR
 
Uh-huh. Hence the need to run off to the 9th? You're side is desperate. You should be.
Desperate. :lol: Silver has no more jurisdiction for her fishing expedition than Wake had for his.

It's about integrity. Watch and learn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top