IMO, this is where the train left the tracks. During the USAir/Piedmont merger, the first thing the CEO did was to pay all pilots the same wage......sure, there were differences in opinion about SLI, but we were all treated respectfully and put on a level playing field. I think that being the regional airline that AWA was, not only did the CEO see a chance to screw us all, but the pilots had no clue as to what the word unity meant. SLI could have been worked out over time, but the NIC came out and the hungry greed of the West pilots blinded them since they had never had such an opportunity to leap frog into a "real" airline career, having been the lowest paid pilots in the industry since 1983. breeze
Dude! You must have had a great night... or something!!! However, in the immortal words of Dan Aykroyd: "Breeze, you ignorant sl*t!"
The pay differential between an East pilot and a West pilot is strictly a function of the career trajectory of each pilot group at the time of the merger. Nothing more, nothing less. When you parrot claxon's crow; with respect to the "lowest paid pilots in the industry since 1983", "and the opportunity to leap frog into a 'real' airline career"; your ignorance is showcased. In any reader's mind, you are immediately relegated to the same level of respect that he commands.
Graph my pay over time, vs. yours and extrapolate out any number of years. In 1983 AWE was a fledgling startup and AAA was a "legacy" carrier. Of course AWA did not pay a commensurate salary. Don't things change over time though? This is somewhat akin to me being stronger than my kid when he was born... Duh???!!! However, with AAA chapter 7 on the event horizon, (Check the "move-up" date to make payroll), and my son who now outweighs me by 30 lbs and is in MUCH better shape than I... (Draw your own conclusions here...) It is no wonder that a "West" pilot is paid much more that his "East" compatriot.
The only thing that you have correct is that an unscrupulous CEO chose to take advantage of an embittered, battered "legacy" pilot group that outnumbered it's "brothers", and was able, by wage and benefit undercutting, to seize the growth of their "brothers", at the cost of their own compensation stagnation.
You think that the train left the tracks when Dougie refused to pay you what I make??? You could not be further from the truth. The train left the tracks when a mal-content group of pilots that could not accurately assess their position in the aviation community, deliberately chose this course, as opposed to accepting the unbiased, third party assessment of appropriate placement on a combined SLI.
Your premise is flawed from the outset. Equal pay does not even remotely factor into a decision to accept a neutral, fair seniority arbitration. Even with the pressure of inadequate compensation until acceptance, your group has chosen this path. If your position is justified, just bring us a contract with a pay raise. Otherwise, my assessment of you and your group is entirely correct. KTGSD!