What's new

AWA contributes to lowest Profit margin

Status
Not open for further replies.

lithuanian

Senior
Joined
Feb 2, 2006
Messages
469
Reaction score
0
US Airways is No #1 in Profit. And AWA is Dead Last in the contribution according to the BIZJOURNAL. What the HELL has AWA contributed to the MERGER? We are INSENSED! 25 years and we are becoming a Liability! Someone give us something!
 
Like I said in the other thread, for accounting purposes, a lot of the costs associated with the east operation were charged to the west bottom line. So, the east in reality was not as profitable as the article portrays it to be and the west fared much better.
 
US Airways is No #1 in Profit. And AWA is Dead Last in the contribution according to the BIZJOURNAL. What the HELL has AWA contributed to the MERGER? We are INSENSED! 25 years and we are becoming a Liability! Someone give us something!
Pot stirrer :down:
 
Pot stirrer :down:

Ya! We are Pot Stirrer'! Read what the Charlotte Biz Journal said about US, (AWA). No, we don't want this kind of publicity. We were a home town airline that was respected. Let, the management take THAT blame.
 
Like I said in the other thread, for accounting purposes, a lot of the costs associated with the east operation were charged to the west bottom line. So, the east in reality was not as profitable as the article portrays it to be and the west fared much better.

It might be time for the number crunchers to have their say. I'm sorry I didn't stop to read this article as it has been posted before. West is definitely not Your problem East. Who, can make sense of this merger. Will it last?
 
Like I said in the other thread, for accounting purposes, a lot of the costs associated with the east operation were charged to the west bottom line. So, the east in reality was not as profitable as the article portrays it to be and the west fared much better.

Yeah, like costs of bailing Parker out, implementing QIK, cheapening labor, deferring maintenance, etc. and so on. Those costs should be charged to the morons that are responsible, West. That is how accountability should work.
 
US Airways is No #1 in Profit. And AWA is Dead Last in the contribution according to the BIZJOURNAL. What the HELL has AWA contributed to the MERGER? We are INSENSED! 25 years and we are becoming a Liability! Someone give us something!


Talk to an accountant, they understand numbers.

same old crap
 
Ya! We are Pot Stirrer'! Read what the Charlotte Biz Journal said about US, (AWA). No, we don't want this kind of publicity. We were a home town airline that was respected. Let, the management take THAT blame.
America West was a respected home town airline as well . .now look at US!
 
Like I said in the other thread, for accounting purposes, a lot of the costs associated with the east operation were charged to the west bottom line. So, the east in reality was not as profitable as the article portrays it to be and the west fared much better.

BULL!!
 
US Airways is No #1 in Profit. And AWA is Dead Last in the contribution according to the BIZJOURNAL. What the HELL has AWA contributed to the MERGER? We are INSENSED! 25 years and we are becoming a Liability! Someone give us something!
Yeah, and USAirways was soooooo profitable before the merger.
AWA carried the entire profit for the merged airline in 2005 ..and was profitable in 2003 & 2004.
 
Yeah, and USAirways was soooooo profitable before the merger.
AWA carried the entire profit for the merged airline in 2005 ..and was profitable in 2003 & 2004.
"The Company recently undertook a review of its fuel hedge accounting as part of
its preparation to complete its annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
Dec. 31, 2004. During this review, the Company determined that, due to recent
business and regulatory developments, its formal hedge documentation did not
meet the requirements imposed by the Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS
No. 133) to hedge its fuel purchases as cash flow hedges. SFAS No. 133 provides
guidance to companies when accounting for financial derivative instruments. In
addition, management also concluded that the accounting entries made at each
quarter end in 2003 and 2004 needed to be corrected to properly reflect the fair
value of open derivative instruments in the balance sheets and statements of
stockholders' equity and comprehensive income of Holdings and AWA. Accordingly,
the Company will restate the Company's and the airline's balance sheet and
statement of changes in stockholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss) as
of and for the year ended Dec. 31, 2003, as well as their interim financial
results during 2003 and 2004. Those restatements will recognize, as part of its
net income or loss during these periods, the non-cash gains and losses on these
financial derivative instruments. The restatements will not impact the Company's
or the airline's cash position at any date."

AMERICA WEST UPDATES PREVIOUSLY REPORTED FINANCIAL RESULTS 2003 2004
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top