TWU and AA were unable to reach an agreement in their 'Super Session" therefore resulting
in mediation. Something the company had hoped for all along! :down:
bigdawg, I work in Dallas and just received a call from a union friend/brother. Didn't have time for details.And this info came frome where, not second guessing just like to dot the eyes and cross the tees. You know what I am saying
You mean 7 months past the amendable date dont you? IIRC they started negotiations 6 months prior with the hopes of having an agreement by May.It's on the TWU negotiations website and I got a text from my local rep. Hey they negotiated for 7 months. Good enough to go into mediation in my opinion. Whatever the outcome about a year from now, just don't vote yes without retro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😛h34r:
It's on the TWU negotiations website and I got a text from my local rep. Hey they negotiated for 7 months. Good enough to go into mediation in my opinion. Whatever the outcome about a year from now, just don't vote yes without retro!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 😛h34r:
Do not subscribe to breakroom rumors and management whispers. Your TWU Negotiating Committee NEEDS YOU to stay informed. Talks are reaching a critical stage as the amendable date draws nearer. Go to NegotiAAte.twu.org and subscribe for the most accurate information.
From the Negotiations Update;
Shouldnt they update the update? The amendable date was seven months ago.
Looks like they will have an announcement on Monday, the 15th.
For now it looks like the only place to get any info is here, as usual.
You mean 7 months past the amendable date dont you? IIRC they started negotiations 6 months prior with the hopes of having an agreement by May.
If they go to mediation, which usually means binding arbitration eventually, there will be no vote on anything.
You sir are incorrect! There is no "binding arbitration" under the RLA. For the umpteenth time, mediation, impasse, cooling off period, free to strike, free to impose "yellowdog".
Get with the program dude...
There is no "forced" binding arbitration, but it can be agreed upon by both parties dude! 🙄
Both parties agree to binding arbitration Either party or both decline binding Arbitration Board of Arbitration convenes, may hold a hearing, and issues a Binding Decision A 30-day cooling-off (status-quo) period is invoked.
What happens if either party rejects the PEB's proposed agreement?
If either party rejects the PEB's proposal, the parties may, after the second 30-day cooling off period, engage in self-help.
Is there any circumstance in which the parties are constrained from engaging in self-help after rejecting a PEB's proposal?
Yes. It is possible for Congress to intervene and legislatively mandate a settlement. If this is done, Congress most typically would simply take the recommendations of the PEB and write them into law. This would mean that a contract would be legislated by Congress and no strike or no membership ratification would be allowed.
I cannot remember any time when both parties in a RLA dispute agreed to arbitration (at least not any airline within the last 20 years or so)...but I could be wrong.There is no "forced" binding arbitration, but it can be agreed upon by both parties dude! 🙄
Both parties agree to binding arbitration Either party or both decline binding Arbitration Board of Arbitration convenes, may hold a hearing, and issues a Binding Decision A 30-day cooling-off (status-quo) period is invoked.