Hopeful
Veteran
- Joined
- Dec 21, 2002
- Messages
- 5,998
- Reaction score
- 347
This is a tough issue. There is a time to take a principled stand and a time to be a pragmatist. Right now I lean toward the latter because I don't see anything else out there better than the (concessionary) wage I'm currently receiving. If times were good and unemployment low, we'd have a much stronger negotiating position. But choosing to be pragmatic at this point means looking reality straight in the face, and it ain't pretty.
Let me remind you that the company only afforded us a 6 1/2% raise over 6 years during the 1995-2001 contract. those were some of the most profitable quarters and years in AMR history.
And before you respond with "WELL THE TWU NEGOTIATED THAT AND YOU PEOPLE VOTED FOR IT," stop right there.......AA knew their future growth and profit outlook. They offered a "5 and 5" retirement package where many a senior member voted for it. Smart move on AA's part, no argument from me there.
To top it off, we had to wait three years for the first 3 1/2% and another three years for the three % balance.
Spare me the "ask for more when times are better" spiel.
With the help of the TWU, the company negotiated away 40 years of gains and no every single item has to be fought for again and the company doesn't want to give squat without more concessions.
AA management is not that different from the WALL STREET financial and insurer bunch who ARE STILL GETTING THEIRS AND NOW WITH TAXPAYER DOLLARS.
They are still taking and not giving.