CWA Files for Representation Election

  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #16
Oh I guess you never came across a NON UNION worker who was rude in your entire life?

Let me explain something to you.....Airline workers as a whole have born the brunt of getting screwed since deregulation. Tens of thousands of layoffs, paycuts, benefits and pensions lost....And your priority is getting that "special" treatment because you're so special.

If management was as wonderful and always right as some defenders like you believe, there would be no unions...or any desire for them.
I agree 110%
I lived it!! No need to explain to me.Try to explain it to the rest of AA hire union busting machine
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #18
Here is a little CWA agent history in bankrupisty court with the passenger service group


http://web.archive.org/web/20041024043020/http://cwa.net/PDFs/CWA2.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041024042954/http://cwa.net/PDFs/BKORDER.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041024044020/http://cwa.net/PDFs/CWA1.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041012074414/http://www.cwa.net/PDFs/5%20CWA%20Update%204%20103.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041012031406/http://www.cwa.net/PDFs/4%20CWA%20Update%202%2027%2003.pdf
Stay informed good luck
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #19
I could care less if they go union, but it's not going to gain them anything they don't already have. It might wind up costing a few things. Agents have a pretty liberal TL policy right now, and it has helped avoided seasonal layoffs. Put a CBA in place, and AA will probably furlough instead of bothering to look for TL. Home-based Res would probably go away in a heartbeat.
http://apsa6001.org/?p=115
Questions from Agents
I was recently told by my supervisor that we could lose our flexibility with a union. Is this true?

A. Only if you decide to negotiate your flexibility away. Let’s look at the facts. You will elect your negotiating team that will consist of agents from reservations. They will negotiate everything that pertains to wages, working conditions, and benefits. TL, Flex Time, and CS’s are items that would fall under working conditions. Most airline contracts expand on these items when negotiated and they have proven to be items that have saved the company money. If these save the company money why would the company insist you give them up when you already have them without a contract? In addition, would you vote for a contract that limits your flexibility? A contract will only pass once it has been voted favorable by more than 50% of the work force.

Fact: The company gave us many of these flexible items during our last union campaign to get us to not vote in the last election. Then later many restrictions were placed on them without a union. Everything that was taken away from us would have had to been negotiated if we had a union.
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #21
FACT: Union dues will not be collected until the first contract is negotiated and voted on by a majority. If the first contract is not voted in by the bargaining unit you go back to negotiations. Dues will not start until the bargaining unit votes yes . Would you vote for a contract that doesn’t improve working conditions, wages, and benefits?
 
Let’s look at the facts. You will elect your negotiating team that will consist of agents from reservations. They will negotiate everything that pertains to wages, working conditions, and benefits. TL, Flex Time, and CS’s are items that would fall under working conditions. Most airline contracts expand on these items when negotiated and they have proven to be items that have saved the company money. If these save the company money why would the company insist you give them up when you already have them without a contract?

One sided facts always sound great.

What I know after 25 years of watching airlines is that whatever flexibility exists today due to "local policy" will evaporate once you have shop stewards trying to enforce a contract that has to be followed at every station.

Fact: The company gave us many of these flexible items during our last union campaign to get us to not vote in the last election. Then later many restrictions were placed on them without a union. Everything that was taken away from us would have had to been negotiated if we had a union.

Lie. I was an agent, and we had CS, Flex, TL, etc. long before the CWA tried it's first failed attempt at a card drive.

Oh, and for the record, CS has never been contractual for the TWU, so don't hold your breath on making it negotiable.

Still didn't answer how many times you guys have tried and failed...
 
The agents if certified will have a seat at the bargaining table with management and will be able to negotiate a contract like every other employee group at AA. It well be interresting to see how the bankrupisty courts will handle status quo if the agents certify CWA. The creditors committee is not were the contracts would be negotiate with labor.
What is a TL?
Better educate yourself, there is no status quo obligation for a newly certified group.

Better go check AMFA vs Atlantic Coast Airlines, Lee Seeham lost a case and now there is no status quo for a newly unionized group without a CBA.

Case Law
 
Here is a little CWA agent history in bankrupisty court with the passenger service group


http://web.archive.org/web/20041024043020/http://cwa.net/PDFs/CWA2.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041024042954/http://cwa.net/PDFs/BKORDER.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041024044020/http://cwa.net/PDFs/CWA1.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041012074414/http://www.cwa.net/PDFs/5%20CWA%20Update%204%20103.pdf
http://web.archive.org/web/20041012031406/http://www.cwa.net/PDFs/4%20CWA%20Update%202%2027%2003.pdf
Stay informed good luck


I finally had time to look at those links... two are briefs submitted by the CWA's attorney, two are newsletters, and one is the order allowing US to impose pay cuts and new working conditions.

The only thing they show is that the CWA couldn't prevent a 21% pay cut being imposed by the court.

It's the agents' right to organize if they choose to, but I think it would be a huge mistake to do so. I'm sure the outsourcing flag will be waved, but to me it's a red herring.

AA stopped functional outsourcing at airports when Don O'Hare retired, which was some time in the 1990's. The only functions still outsourced that I recall are baggage service in the hubs. The trend of outsourcing call centers jobs to India & Asia seems to have reversed in just about every sector, so I also wouldn't expect that to happen with the existing res offices. Where exactly is the threat?
 
  • Thread Starter
  • Thread starter
  • #25
I think it would be a huge mistake to do so. Where exactly is the threat?
AA won’t outsource and management will take care of the unprotected passenger service agent group. Job protection management style with no legal protections
 
AA won’t outsource and management will take care of the unprotected passenger service agent group. Job protection management style with no legal protections

I still have to stopped laughing at your post. AA will outsource and already have. They will not protect the agents jobs and don't care about them or any other employee. If they took care for them, then they wouldn't be working a gate for a full 767 from LAX-JFK solo. They also would not have put up thousands of this self check-in kiosks at the airports. Those kiosks have taken jobs away!

Either you drink Kool-AAid or work in AA management.
 
I still have to stopped laughing at your post. AA will outsource and already have. They will not protect the agents jobs and don't care about them or any other employee. If they took care for them, then they wouldn't be working a gate for a full 767 from LAX-JFK solo. They also would not have put up thousands of this self check-in kiosks at the airports. Those kiosks have taken jobs away!

Either you drink Kool-AAid or work in AA management.


Let me add this possibility to the mix..The company has been emphasizing the FIVE FOCUS CITIES....MIA< DFW< ORD< JFK<LAX....Don't be surprised if they decide to destaff all Class2 and lower stations for ALL work groups.
As it is, Just about every flight I see being worked, there is usually ONE agent per flight with a rolling CSM.....
 
Let me add this possibility to the mix..The company has been emphasizing the FIVE FOCUS CITIES....MIA< DFW< ORD< JFK<LAX....Don't be surprised if they decide to destaff all Class2 and lower stations for ALL work groups.
As it is, Just about every flight I see being worked, there is usually ONE agent per flight with a rolling CSM.....

Bank on it.

In our case at NW, they wanted all agents and ramp gone except in DTW & MSP.

Just a hunch, but I'd also bank on Little & Co. throwing a sh*t ton of those same people under the bus in the name of "preserving the pension."
 
One sided facts always sound great.

What I know after 25 years of watching airlines is that whatever flexibility exists today due to "local policy" will evaporate once you have shop stewards trying to enforce a contract that has to be followed at every station.



Lie. I was an agent, and we had CS, Flex, TL, etc. long before the CWA tried it's first failed attempt at a card drive.

Oh, and for the record, CS has never been contractual for the TWU, so don't hold your breath on making it negotiable.

Still didn't answer how many times you guys have tried and failed...

And how many of those 25 years have you worked Union?

I've got 31 years, worked both union and non- union and if anything having a union gives you more flexibility not less.

Having a union gives you rights as well.

I wish the agents well, You guys need a union.
 
Let me add this possibility to the mix..The company has been emphasizing the FIVE FOCUS CITIES....MIA< DFW< ORD< JFK<LAX....Don't be surprised if they decide to destaff all Class2 and lower stations for ALL work groups.
As it is, Just about every flight I see being worked, there is usually ONE agent per flight with a rolling CSM.....
Are you indicating that the company does not need line maintenance? The company could just staff these FIVE FOCUS CITIES with base mechanics and they would have to pull what line duty there would be based on seniority. With the demise of the 1/7th rule, you could have full 7 day coverage at the FIVE FOCUS CITIES and TULSA.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top