Mom? Get to bed. I will bring over the cigarettes and brandy later, I was busy.Okay,,,,you are an azzhole and an idiot!
Mom? Get to bed. I will bring over the cigarettes and brandy later, I was busy.Okay,,,,you are an azzhole and an idiot!
The only fault you all have is that you never learned the distinction of a "valid argument" and a "true argument", so you are left with finding wickedness in anyone with whom you disagree. Being ignorant (perhaps willfully) of the distinction you have no means to ascribe good moral intent to your fellow man that exercises means lawfully available to him, if it results in an outcome that you oppose.
"Fair and equitable" was part of the terms that Nicolau had to abide by, and ALPA, right or wrong, provided a means for both sides to be the judge of "fair and equitable" by providing veto authority via a simple majority on either side--even on the smaller side. The result was that, fewer than 25% could reject the ALPA directed outcome. There is nothing morally special about either side. If the shoes where switched the reactions and efforts would have been exactly the same.
I apologize for interrupting your single issue rant. Please carry on.![]()
It is sort of like travel, scuba diving, astronomy. You never know what you are going to get.You live in a fog of Cognitive Dissonance. Be a man, live up to your promises...especially the ones you legally entered into. All these years of ducking and hiding from your ultimate responsibility, what has it got you? Jack Squat.
Honorable people honor their agreements, you wouldn't expect anything else from others, you don't get a pass.
Do your own research. You are just wrong. I am tired of educating the unteachable.Well I am sure the East pilots appreciate a furloughed west pilot like you being able to save them.
As far as your "It was not ALPA national or the AA pilots that got us a DC plan, we already had that." Please proved a quote from your contract, regarding your assertion.
It is difficult to research your "facts", because there is nothing to back it up.Do your own research. You are just wrong. I am tired of educating the unteachable.
Woop there it is.Is this what you need Claxon:
[color=rgb(13.699000%, 12.199000%, 12.500000%)]SECTION 28 RETIREMENT [/color]
The Company shall sponsor a 401(k) Plan. This 401(k) Plan shall contain, at a minimum, the plan design features set forth in Appendix D unless the Associa­ tion agrees otherwise. All other features of the 401(k) Plan are subject to Company discretion.
Have someone read App D to you. Heading "Company non-elective discretionary contributions"401k is not a DC plan. A 401k match is not a DC plan. I admire you for sticking up for clear, it needs the help.
Every one has a 401k plan, you had no DC plan. You are denying you are furloughed from america west, correct? Yes or no.Woop there it is.
Let's review the timeline.
West contract signed Dec 13, 2003
DC starts 01/01/05
Merger announced May 2005. Transition agree signed many months after that.
The AWA ALPA had negotiated a DC plan long before the east pilots jobs were saved. But thanks for the profit sharing. What did the east pilots get in exchange? Must have gotten something or were they just used to giving away things?
Would you care to admit you were wrong and correct your statement Claxon?
Yes, and where is app d sir? If you app n d have if, let me know.Have someone read App D to you. Heading "Company non-elective discretionary contributions"
You are entitled to your opinion.There is your problem. usapa is bound to DOH. M/B arbitration, the company and APA are not. The company is bound by a contract so is usapa. Being bound by DOH is why usapa will not be able to negotiate a list and why it will go to arbitration. Arbitration is not DOH.
Little sayings do not answer my question. I asked for details. How does usapa and the east pilots avoid the Nicolau?
Honestly... If it were me, I would avoid it by embracing it... Use the merger to tack on a 5 year fence between the 3 "separate" pilot groups. Westies have their lollipop back, AAA protected reguardless of an arbitrated MB, and east has what they have wanted all along.... But that's just me... Now back to reality... No way the BPR votes 11-0 for a MOU that includes the NIC...AAA vote was 11-5 without a five year dispute... Just saying.
You were the one alleging facts. I just told you you were wrong.It is difficult to research your "facts", because there is nothing to back it up.
You live in a fog of Cognitive Dissonance. Be a man, live up to your promises...especially the ones you legally entered into. All these years of ducking and hiding from your ultimate responsibility, what has it got you? Jack Squat.
Honorable people honor their agreements, you wouldn't expect anything else from others, you don't get a pass.
Yes, and where is app d sir? If you app n d have if, let me know.