The following is an excerpt from the Jan 10, 2013 BPR special telephonic meeting. So where is this report and why haven't the line pilots seen it?? It appears this was required to be done and the info from the report supplied to the pilots... Where is it??
At approximately 2130, the following motion was Moved/Seconded (Crimi/McKee).
Scope Provisions Evaluation
WHEREAS, the USAPA Board of Pilot Representatives recently approved an MOU that is widely anticipated to include amendments to Section 1 (Scope) of the US Airways's pilots' Collective Bargaining Agreement, and
WHEREAS, it is in the best interest of the US Airways's pilots to be provided a comprehensive review of the section 1 provisions prior to their voting to approve or disapprove possible amendments, and
WHEREAS, USAPA has in the past contracted and consulted with Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.'s Mergers and Acquisitions ("M&A") Practice Group, who conducted a thorough review of Sections 1©, 1(D), 1(E), 1(F), 1(I), and 1(J) of the East
CBA,
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the BPR directs the EVP to contact Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.'s for M&A services and consulting and assess the firm's availability to immediately undertake a review of the potential AMR/LCC transaction relative to the scope provisions of our Collective Bargaining Agreement, the valuation of such provisions, and possible triggering events, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED if it is confirmed that the Giordano firm is available, the BPR directs the USAPA Executive Vice President to immediately contract with the firm to undertake a review and evaluation of Section 1 (A), and 1( B) of the East CBA and all of Section 1 of the West CBA in relation to the contemplated transactions, and
BE IT FINALY RESOLVED that if Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla are contracted, the BPR directs that the firm coordinate with and report to the President, Merger Committee Chairman and Grievance Committee Chairman for USAPA.
At approximately 2155, a motion to table was Moved/Seconded (Stein/Dugstad), but failed 5-6 (For - DCA Stein, Dugstad, PHL Weidner, PHX Scherff, Simmons; Against - CLT, PHL Szpyrka, Gillies, PHX Velez).
The question was then called (Gillies/Crimi) and the motion passed 6-3-2 (For CLT, PHL- Szpyrka, Gilles; DCA- Stein, Against PHX; Abstain DCA Dugstad, PHL Weidner)