- Joined
- May 8, 2007
- Messages
- 3,146
- Reaction score
- 3,236
How "condescending" of you to presume YOU know all about the MOU. This is a big part of the problem. It isn't so much about reading and understanding it, it's about reading it, understanding it, and KNOWING that there are more questions then answers.How condescending of you. So only the no voters have actually read the whole 16 pages and understand it?
That the poor uneducated unwashed masses that are voting yes it is beyond them to make the proper decision (in your opinion) and vote no.
More fear and airplane envy. It is 26 "big" airplanes. Is that how you measure your self worth? How many seat your plane has? What did you guys be before Piedmont brought those "big" airplanes?
You must be so proud to fly "big" airplanes for commuter wages on LOA 93. Take a look and see how many of you actually get to fly the "big" airplanes and the MAJORITY of you get to watch with airplane envy as they taxi by. A MAJORITY will never fly the "big" airplane with or without a merge.
Dude it is the size of the paycheck not the number of seats that should be important to you and your family. WB flying pulling down the rest of the industry does not pay for college or retirement. Get over yourself.
I'm am not necessarily opposed to the MOU IF, IF, there was a lot LESS ambiguous and touchy-feely language involved, firstly and secondly, what EXACTLY the "LEGAL" signifigance the MOU or "Memorandum of UNDERSTANDING". If most do NOT understand it what good will it do anyone?
Look, you hate me and I get it. But how about answering the question: DO YOU UNDERSTAND IT?