WorldTraveler said:
no.
you and 4 of your dumbest and most dishonest friends on here just confirmed that the reason why other airlines don't pay for what they are loaned is because you/they didn't bother to report it appropriately.
Again, if there is no charge, then why do each of those companies have a procedure that has been repeatedly acknowledged is broken?
Oh I am dumb now?
How many times have you done a maintenance trip for any airline?
Glenn Quagmire said:
It is that ass hole (WT) that alienates the one person who might be able to get you out of jam. You know, the time you need that lift to save the flight from a maintenance cancellation at an out station. And since you are that guy, the airline with the equipment you need says, "no sale, not now, not to you, not ever, get your own" because you are that douchebag who burned the bridge.
Customer relations 101. Give and take.
exactly. One day you will need something.
but not only that it comes to do cents (maybe) on a dollar. I honestly believe if you sent in paper work because you needed to use a tow bar for literately 30 seconds, it would get to the GO, be looked at and tossed right into the trash.
WorldTraveler said:
no.... you loan the equipment and account for it.
I know the concept is IMPOSSIBLE for you to understand, but it is not only possible but expected to do the right thing AND FOLLOW the rules.
the fact that this discussion has gone the way it is with following the rules being attacked by a bunch of union sympathizers shows EXACTLY what the union movement is made of.
DL people can see that with clarity thanks to this discussion.
now its the unions fault.....
I will give that. You are one heck of a bull **** artist.
Kev3188 said:
Bingo.
I'm not interested in seeing possibly hundreds of our customer's plans tank (and the associated costs incurred to the airline) all because I insisted in charging $2.00 to borrow a towbar...
exactly. This is the thing WT doesn't get. Get 2 bucks for a 2 bar for thousands in losses because of canceled or delayed flights.
That is how I know he is a Leo guy. They never good look at the big picture. Fantastic at spending a million bucks to save a dollar.
WorldTraveler said:
again, no one is telling you to ask for congressional approval while the customers are held on the aircraft.
DO the right thing and document it afterward if necessary.
But you can't expect the company to provide YOU with the right equipment to do your job if you don't document that you have to continually borrow from your competitor.
likewise, if your competitor continually requires to borrow your equipment to run their operation - or to do something as major as an engine change - then they need to pay for the tools they use.
an engine change isn't a matter of just borrowing a screwdriver and a flashlight. If US didn't bring mechanics with the tools necessary to do the job and needed to borrow from DL, they should pay for it.
It is no different from what DL would expect of another airline when DL is the one that needs to borrow.
See this is how we know you don't know what you are talking about.
Okay first and foremost If the US guys didn't have the proper hand tools they wouldn't borrow them from Delta because Delta doesn't have them. I have MY personally owned hand tools and Delta has zero control over that.
More importantly however we are not talking about the engine change kits. We are talking about needing a bag tug, golf cart, lift, air stairs.....mostly a single piece of GSE to get the job done.
and generally we are talking about needing that item for minutes not hours.
So you are basically freaking out over a buck, two bucks worth of use. Delta isn't going to fly in a tug for an engine change. Why? because they know the field trip crew will get one.......and they will generally get one for free.
WorldTraveler said:
and mgmt. DID NOT authorize loaning equipment without documentation.
you clearly missed that you and others said that is precisely the way such a loan was done without a charge.
the hypocrisy would come from you when I asked why the rampers at US did not help clean the FAs set up the galleys or why mechanics should not help the gate agents with the boarding process.
you'll sure play to the rule book then. I can guarantee it.
do you think its mechanics talking to mechanics? No when I need a tow bar or a tug or whatever I go right to the highest person in charge at the station (with-in reason). I have talked to everything from leads to station managers.
And thankfully have yet to run into a king douche like yourself. (and guess what I would leave and go to another airline if I did)
WorldTraveler said:
it doesn't take being a stock clerk to figure out that for profit companies do not invest in their assets in order to help out their competitors.
and they don't intend to help each other out for free and it ONLY happens when employees choose not to follow company procedures - which was validated happened by no less than FOUR people here.
the real world you LIVED in - you have been out of the airline industry for many, many years - doesn't exist for profit-motivated companies.
AA doesn't loan what it has invested in at JFK for free. DL doesn't expect to get it for free.
DL hasn't spent billions on tools and equipment at the TOC so a couple mechanics can loan tools at no charge.
dawg might actually get his big engine test cell if DL Tech Ops received the revenues it is supposed to receive.
you keep saying this so lets make it easy, can you copy the section of TOPPs this is in for us? You clearly know what the rules are so it shouldn't be a problem for you to quote them....
metopower said:
That article about Lee Moak is probably written by Lee Moak. What he did is return to the OLD relationship from before Ron Allen and Leo Mullen. That was restored by Jerry Grienstein and lee Moak . DL pilots have always enjoyed an unique relationship that is different from other airlines. In fact it was DL 's Woolman that asked DL pilots to join ALPA . That was when it was an association for safety and work rules. Hence that is why it is ALPA and not ALPU.
exactly. Man they just don't make them like they did with MR. Woolman anymore.
N628AU said:
WT
I spent three years on the AOG desk at US. While 700 and I rarely see eye to eye on most things here, he is right and you are DEAD wrong. Not everything is done on paper. Sometimes it's just a phone call. Why? Because you build good relationships knowing you are sometimes going to be the one needing help. Plenty of tools have been lent, fasteners given away, etc. because the cost of the paperwork and follow-up outweighs the good neighbor benefit.
By the way have you admitted you are wrong and said that DL had a maintenance base in Asia, and later claimed no one said it. You can't keep track of your own BS.
exactly.
WorldTraveler said:
no I did not admit I was wrong. you came to that conclusion all by yourself despite the fact that the very webpage which dawg provided used the term base to refer to one facility - ATL.
DL has a maintenance facility at MSP and at NRT.
as for your AOG experiences, I am not denying them. you also did not mention when they happened.
I am telling you that airlines do not invest in maintenance facilities, tooling, and equipment to loan it out to competitors at no charge.
when no less than 4 people have said on here that things were loaned out by NOT filling out the company required paperwork, then there is ample evidence that there are violations of company policy going on.
airlines DO cooperate on maintenance and parts. I have said that myself many times.
They don't do it for free and they don't expect someone else to bail them out for free.
and again it is highly noteworthy that the unionistas that are the most adamant about expecting the company to follow work rules and respecting division of responsibilities between work groups are the ones that advocate such a loosey goosey handling of company materials and equipment.
it is no surprise that the same people who clearly don't understand the economics of running a business expect the company to bend over backwards to meet their every demand and act surprised when the company says it makes no economic sense to do so.
Oh sweet Jesus.
I told you when Delta refers to the ATL base at its home base its mean the HQ. MSP and ATL are maintenance bases.
Am I the only having a hard time figuring out why this is so hard for him to grasp?