With professional advisors and negotiators, you might get that. Hired guns aren't perpetually angry with management and don't suffer from industry-lagging poor morale and aren't hung up on all the injustices done to them by management for the past 40 years. They don't argue that the financial statements are only one set of the dual sets of books. Instead, they are paid to devise solutions to your real problem: your pay is lower than you would like.
What you have instead are well-meaning but ignorant mechanics play-acting at negotiations, and it shows. What do you have to show for it? Decades of sub-par results, with only the 2001 contract as the favorable exception.
Time to fire the worthless union and replace it with professionals. Not guys who know how to turn wrenches and fix airplanes - guys who know how to negotiate higher wages and benefits. Winning means knowing when to outsource and when to insource.
It's said that the APA has profesional negotiators and I believe they opened their talks before we did yet they still dont have a contract yet do they?
I have no problem with the concept of hiring professionals but then again who does the hiring? An Economist was hired but I''m not too impressed with his abilities. He was nearly $250 million off on his cost out, in favor of the company. On the company side several of their guys are former union officials, no professional negotiators there either. But I would want someone from our side in there either way.