And Obama started a third war in Libya.
Good point.
And Obama started a third war in Libya.
Let us see if the adults in the room will stand up and be counted, or if they capitulate to the tantrum thrower's on the sidelines.
Lessons from 1937
How to avoid a lost decade
No it doesn't make sense and your math makes no sense. You have no understanding of tax laws vs "loopholes mantra" vs tax rate vs corporate tax rates. If you did you would know how flawed your argument is and holds no water.
Are you arguing that the wealthiest pay greater percentage of their wealth than the working class? I know what their tax rate it but I have seen nothing to substantiate the claim that they actually pay that rare after all the loop holes and deductions are applied.
I gather you are a CPA. then?
You seem to be contradicting yourself. You say they pay more but pay less? That makes no sense.
It is what it is, like it or not.
http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
WON cuts in federal income tax rates for ALL taxpayers. The top income tax rate was reduced from 70 percent to about 36 percent.
You seem to be contradicting yourself. You say they pay more but pay less? That makes no sense.
It is what it is, like it or not.
http://ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
AGI is a joke. After 'adjusted gross income' (key word is adjusted) .
Look at this chart.
View attachment 9132
It makes no sense at all as there is not enough aggregate data.
You can make any statistic look what you want if you don't provide enough data.
One could 'assume' that the top 1% pays 38.02% of taxes but it appears to me that these numbers are tax tables where the threshold is but not what is actually paid.
Whom is this site actually representing?
Problem is the AGI. If we get rid of the 'adjusted' and everyone pays a flat tax, then there would be no ambiguity.
I guess you are not a CPA other wise you would understand.
Two people. One has $100 the other has $1,000, They both pay 10%. Who pays more?
Same two people. The person who makes $100 pays 10% and the person who makes $1,000 pays 5%. Who pays more?
We are talking about two separate amounts. One is the amount the rich pay which is more, the other is a percentage which, at least with Buffet is less.
Better yet, the "Fair Tax"............then everyone pays "Their fair share"..................even illegal aliens !
You are a CPA? I highly doubt that. Worst example ever. Some random equation you pulled from whole cloth to cite an example that lacks merit.
I guess you are not a CPA other wise you would understand.
Two people. One has $100 the other has $1,000, They both pay 10%. Who pays more?
Same two people. The person who makes $100 pays 10% and the person who makes $1,000 pays 5%. Who pays more?
We are talking about two separate amounts. One is the amount the rich pay which is more, the other is a percentage which, at least with Buffet is less.
So I take it you're not a CPA either?
They both pay the same percentage.....just differing amounts....whats your point?
I did not say Americans are stupid or incapable of thinking for themselves. You are putting words in my mouth. I am fully aware of that the dems took control in 2006 as well when the economy was still half way decent. However during the entire Bush presidency the democrats beat the drum endlessly on how he was destroying the economy. Like I said they were howling when unemployment reached 5.2% and the deficit was increasing. Now that they had the majority they exploded the debt and unemployment is off the charts. Yet they have not nor will not do anything meaningful expect increase the social welfare state and push a false class warfare argument.
Yet they have not nor will not do anything meaningful expect increase the social welfare state and push a false class warfare argument.