USFlyer said:
Ok, so ... back to what I asked before then ... what do people think of adding 60 additional mainline aircraft? Can US do it profitably via recalls? If not, what are the options? i.e., Dave in his message said his team is trying to figure out how to do this without labor's involvement. Given that, what do people proprose he do?
US,
This managmenent had Labor's involvment, in a b-i-g way. To even imply that we are not involved now , is Dave's stupidity in filling up space on the "recording".
He needs to focus on fixing the route structure, adding more flights, increasing productivity of the airplanes that presently fly approx 10 hours and fly them up to 12 hours, which chip stated, increases productivity by 20%. The "time balance system" of both f/as and pilots (pilots has not gone into effect yet) will yeild managment great savings and much productivity. Pref bid system had not been instituted yet for pilots and f/as and again will yield managment great, great savings. Simplify and rationionlize the fares. Make them consistant NOT convoluted. Roll the hubs, add the RJs, (which
hasn't gone into effect yet).
ADDRESS THE REVENUE SIDE OF THE EQUATION, which mangment has yet to do.
Improve the product, hire more cleaners to clean the a/c, start "anew" with employee morale, and put away forever the draconian, punitive policies ASAP. And STOP violating our contracts. Move away from the "outsource" issue and recognize you lost this. Mend and build bridges specifically with the IAM and the rest of the employees.
Management has YET to address THEIR OWN PRODUCTIVITY ENHANCEMENTS. Or is there none for mangment?
Managment has just stolen approx 5 min. for every flight crew member per "leg", just by changing the ACARS calculating our flight time COMMENCING January 1, 2004. AND WE DIDN'T EVEN NEGOTIATIE THAT ONE! Huge savings for managment!
Now, what is it that you are asking of me???? To participate in What?????? We are already P-A-R-T-C-I-P-A-T-I-N-G, We are asking managment to "join us"!