What's new

Gay Marriage

Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone also filed a suit against h r r for not doing her job. Could be up to a yr in prison. I j ow that won't happen but she needs to be forced to resign or to do her job. One or the other.
 
Absolutely No One is attempting to prevent her holding her beliefs, or to change them.

She is using her office, a secular position in a secular state, to enforce her personal religious beliefs and to force those beliefs on people whom she is sworn to serve.

How in a land known as freedom can doing that be condoned by anyone?

Who the hell does she think she is?


Absolutely nuts and totally hypocritical.

As is anyone who supports her.
 
They are not even her religious beliefs. I believe she is a pentacolstal and they frown upon divorce so having 3 of them violates her religious beliefs that she holds so dear.

She hates gays and she wants to deprive them of marriage equality. Hopefully she is held in contempt and locked up in jail.
 
Me neither. I think even the plaintiff wants her fined. Someone else will just pay her fines and she can just continue to thumb her nose at the law and the people she swore an oath to serve.

So much for law and order republicans.
 
"Render unto Caesar what is Caesar's, and unto God what is God's"

There is a figurative lesson in there too, and this supposed "Christian" is ignoring it.

But, hey, she'll get her 15 minutes
 
10647033_1241096069241272_5298756706639766833_n.jpg
 
Mat Bevin is clueless. He wants to pass a law that would exempt government officials from carrying out their duties that would violate the COTUS. And the south wonders why they have the reputation that they have?

She needs to see the inside of a jail cell for a few days. Perhaps that will wake her up.

The party of law and order until they disagree with the law then ... screw it. She is a lying hypocrite. Hope she loses her job.
 
You have the right to your life
You have the right to your liberty to live as you choose
You have the right to your property
You have the right to defend yourself from the initiation of force and you may not initiate force against another.
 
All of the above to me at least suggests that government should have no role beyond enforcement of contracts negotiated between consenting adults.
 
If the government is out of the marriage business do we even have a debate? As far as that goes then why shouldn't a woman be able to sell her unborn child to the highest bidder if we favor a "Pro-Choice" view?
 
 
SparrowHawk said:
You have the right to your life
You have the right to your liberty to live as you choose
You have the right to your property
You have the right to defend yourself from the initiation of force and you may not initiate force against another.
 
All of the above to me at least suggests that government should have no role beyond enforcement of contracts negotiated between consenting adults.
 
If the government is out of the marriage business do we even have a debate? As far as that goes then why shouldn't a woman be able to sell her unborn child to the highest bidder if we favor a "Pro-Choice" view?
 

Surrogate mothers? Adoption? Money is being exchanged in order to obtain a child.
 
Supposedly the money that changes hands is "legally" only to cover costs. Does that get stretched? Probably.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Back
Top