Gay Marriage

[signals]

Post 1334 700UW
 
So you can see why Reagan was right to FIRE the ATC workers who went on strike because they were bound by a NO STRIKE CLAUS!
 
Thank you for proving hypocrisy!

 

[700UW]

"No one's being jailed for practicing her religion. Someone's being jailed for using the government to force others to practice her religion."
 
That was written by Rachel Held Evans, a Christian author.

 

[700UW]

 

[southwind]

You, should, be, punished, with, reading, .punctuation challenged, doofus'

So, in your book, Isis gets a free pass.......got it!

 

[Ms Tree]

So, in your book, Isis gets a free pass.......got it!

This coming from the guy who book says NK has not threatened the US and Reagan did not negotiate with terrorists.

Priceless.

 

[townpete]

Dear hypocrite liberals:
 
Same-sex 'marriage’ started with lawbreaking. It was in 2004 when then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom flaunted the law of the land by ordering those very marriage licenses to be issued to same-sex couples.
 
It’s interesting that gay activists who praised SF Mayor Gavin Newsom for illegally issuing marriage licenses now vilify Kim Davis.
 
That right there is priceless....

 

[Ms Tree]

Did Newsom continue to issue licences in viator of multiple court orders?

 

[Hatu]

image.jpg

I know this is different: private sector vs. government. But let the games begin:

Muslim flight attendant says she was suspended for refusing to serve alcohol


(CNN)—A Muslim flight attendant says she was suspended for refusing to serve alcohol in accordance with her Islamic faith.

In a bid to get her job back, Charee Stanley filed a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Tuesday for the revocation of a reasonable religious accommodation.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/index.html

 

[700UW]

But she wasn't a Moslem when she took the job.

She won't win, that's not a reasonable accommodation.

 

[Hatu]

Dear hypocrite liberals:
 
Same-sex 'marriage’ started with lawbreaking. It was in 2004 when then-San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom flaunted the law of the land by ordering those very marriage licenses to be issued to same-sex couples.
 
It’s interesting that gay activists who praised SF Mayor Gavin Newsom for illegally issuing marriage licenses now vilify Kim Davis.
 
That right there is priceless....

LOL: "law of the land". Which land are you talking about? It was a California law that was broken, not federal. There never has been a federal "law of the land" banning gay marriage. As you know, the Supreme Court just rendered their decision that state laws that ban gay marriage are unconstitutional. So, in essence, Mayor Newsom was going against an unconstitutional law. Not the case for Kim Davis.

 

[townpete]

I know this is different: private sector vs. government. But let the games begin:

Muslim flight attendant says she was suspended for refusing to serve alcohol


(CNN)—A Muslim flight attendant says she was suspended for refusing to serve alcohol in accordance with her Islamic faith.

In a bid to get her job back, Charee Stanley filed a discrimination complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on Tuesday for the revocation of a reasonable religious accommodation.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/09/05/travel/muslim-flight-attendant-feat/index.html

 
 
Silly goose, dontcha know Muslims are a protected class? Liberals will bend themselves into pretzels defending her.

 

[Kev3188]

Love is love. Frankly this planet could use more of it.

What's the fuss?

 

[townpete]

Love is love. Frankly this planet could use more of it.

What's the fuss?

 
What no squishy drippy hashtags to go along with that?
 
lol

 

[blue collar]

LOL: "law of the land". Which land are you talking about? It was a California law that was broken, not federal. There never has been a federal "law of the land" banning gay marriage. As you know, the Supreme Court just rendered their decision that state laws that ban gay marriage are unconstitutional. So, in essence, Mayor Newsom was going against an unconstitutional law. Not the case for Kim Davis.

Newsom also wasn't breaking the law in order to discriminate, but to be all inclusive. Davis is using her religion as a reason to discriminate, all while defying multiple court orders. When Obama does things the right doesn't like they complain about him trampling all over the constitution; when Davis does it, they claim it's her religious freedom. Ironic that her argument is based on her 1st amendment rights, which is in the same document that she is violating by denying citizens their 14th amendment right.

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Interesting that radical Islamic fundamentalists are fighting for their own "God's Law".

Not many realize how similar Kim Davis is to those same people wanting to implement their own gods law (Sharia law).

I am glad that our founding fathers had the forethought to stop this.