good article on parker

etops1

Veteran
Dec 6, 2003
2,740
362
Article By Jeff Bailey of The New York Times
Published: January 12, 2007

TEMPE, Ariz. — A good mood can be infectious, and W. Douglas Parker, chief executive of US Airways, with a sunny disposition and a $10.5 billion takeover proposal for Delta Air Lines, has helped make the airline industry feel better about itself again.

Gone for the moment are dreary laments about sky-high fuel costs, about fractious labor relations that can bring airlines to a virtual halt, and about the inevitable economic downturn that could very well plunge one or more of the thinly capitalized domestic carriers back into bankruptcy.

Indeed, the usual downer talk about airlines is being drowned out by the sweet murmurings of speculation, as an industry that for many reasons should be loathed by investors regains a little glamour on Wall Street.

Will Mr. Parker succeed in buying Delta and in carving out his promised $1.65 billion in cost savings, or will someone else pay even more? Will United Airlines and Continental Airlines, fearful of being left behind, also merge, and force a wholesale streamlining of the industry that might help smooth out the wrenching ups and downs of the past?

Mr. Parker, more than any other industry player, sparked this turnaround in sentiment with what appears to be a startlingly successful merger of the old US Airways, a carrier that was in bankruptcy twice since 2001, and his America West Airlines, a much smaller company that itself badly needed a cash infusion.

He raised $866 million from outside investors, and brought the airlines together in time to catch an updraft in ticket pricing that has restored the industry to rare profitability.

US Airways’ market capitalization now stands at $5.4 billion. Since the merger, its new shares have tripled in value from a first-day close of $20.21 on Sept. 29, 2005, to $61.20 on Thursday.

“We are the first post-Sept. 11 success story,â€￾ said Jack Stephan, a captain and head of the union chapter that represents pilots from the old US Airways side.

It has not hurt, in navigating the merger, that “Doug Parker is charming,â€￾ Mr. Stephan added.

Mr. Parker, 45 and boyish — pilots and others call him Doogie, after the television teenage doctor “Doogie Howser, M.D.â€￾ — has, with a combination of self-deprecation and a quiet determination about the economics of mergers, made investors see airlines as a troubled industry that can be profitable instead of just a troubled industry.

Delta is still in bankruptcy, recovering from years of missteps like entering into a costly pilots’ contract just before the last downturn, and flying big planes on routes better served by smaller craft.

But the price offered by US Airways puts Delta within $3 billion of the market value of Southwest, the lone big airline that has bragging rights for consistent profitability. A lot must keep going right for Delta, and much of the rest of the industry, to justify investors’ confidence.

“Currently, the market is priced for perfection,â€￾ said Roger King, an analyst at CreditSights. “Investors have Doug Parker to thank.â€￾

Mr. Parker, in an interview at US Airways headquarters here, said the success of his initial merger — and the market’s embrace of the proposed Delta combination — had nothing to do with superior management skills and everything to do with the savings from combining two airlines.

“We’d like to attribute it to management, but it’s due to the merger,â€￾ he said. When congratulated for sounding modest while arguing for the Delta combination, he smiled and declared, “Just the sweet spot I was trying to hit.â€￾

In pursuing Delta before the earlier merger is completely integrated, Mr. Parker is trying to take advantage of Delta’s stay in bankruptcy, where a company can jettison assets and obligations and reshape its operations more easily than outside bankruptcy. He is also moving on to the new target before negotiating more expensive labor contracts with US Airways workers, who gave up a lot to keep the airline in business.

On the US Airways-America West merger, “Doug threw the Hail Mary pass,â€￾ the chief executive of a much larger airline said, admiringly. “He’s smart enough to know, ‘I’ve got this really low cost structure, which is temporary. Because when these people storm the barracks, I’m going to have to appease them after what they’ve been through.’ â€￾

The merger of US Airways and America West remains a work in progress. The reservations systems operate separately, for the most part. The company still lacks an operating certificate from the Federal Aviation Administration to run the airlines as a single operation, so pilots and flight attendants remain bound to their old airlines (the certificate is expected this year).

And some of the merger steps have not gone well. An effort to combine the two carriers’ Web sites led to weeks of malfunctions last year.

But reducing the overlap in corporate staffs and grounding about 60 planes resulted in huge savings. At the same time, because many airlines were shrinking their fleets, US Airways was able to raise fares domestically by about 15 percent last year without a drop in traffic.

For the first nine months of 2006, US Airways reported net income of $292 million on revenue of $8.77 billion.

The Delta proposal is also based on grounding planes — about 10 percent of the combined fleet — while maintaining the same level of traffic. The carriers’ operations overlap through much of the Eastern states.

Pilots and flight attendants at US Airways want higher pay in their new contracts to reflect the airline’s success. “Just because the company is making money doesn’t make me happy,â€￾ said Mike Flores, head of the chapter of the Association of Flight Attendants that represents workers at the old US Airways. “I need to make money, too.â€￾

Lucy Mosby, a flight attendant in Charlotte, N.C., said she was paid $36,000 last year by US Airways. After two bankruptcies that involved worker concessions, “I feel like I’m where I was when I startedâ€￾ eight years ago, she said. “I just picked up a part-time job. I do sales at Crate & Barrel.â€￾

To date, Mr. Parker has kept unions at US Airways from outright opposing the Delta takeover. He tells workers that the combination would make the companies more profitable, and thus more stable for employees.

“Given the track record of Parker and his team, I’d think he’d have a good idea of what’s going to happen,â€￾ said Gary Richardson, who heads the chapter of the Association of Flight Attendants representing workers from the old America West.

While Mr. Richardson is frustrated by the slow pace of negotiations, and wants a big pay increase for historically low-paid flight attendants at the airline, he remains a Parker admirer. “He’s a great guy,â€￾ Mr. Richardson said. “An incredible man.â€￾

Mr. Parker joined the airline industry right out of college, working first in finance at American Airlines and then Northwest Airlines before joining America West, where he was promoted to chief executive just 10 days before Sept. 11, 2001. The airline was nearly out of cash and survived only by securing the first government loan guarantee.

Mr. Parker nonetheless went looking for acquisitions. He was outbid by Southwest for some assets of ATA Airlines. That left America West free to pursue much larger US Airways, which was teetering near liquidation, in 2005.

Though little known outside the industry, he was able to persuade investors that his young management team could run the merged airlines.

That takeover battle was so busy, he said, he wasn’t able to run regularly. During this effort, he is making time to run to stay healthy.

The good will he enjoys among many workers, including union officials, is in part because of the upward swing that America West and US Airways enjoyed shortly after he became chief executive.

But it is also because of his manner. He steers away from management-speak, uses plain language and often discusses a situation from the other person’s perspective. And he laughs easily at himself.

His wife, Gwen, is a former flight attendant and union activist at American. And, as Mr. Parker said in an interview last year, if he comes home complaining that workers need to make concessions, “it’s not going to make for a nice evening at home.â€￾

Among airline executives, said Mr. Stephan, the pilots’ union official, “Doug is probably the closest thing to an airline guy.â€￾
 
Good article, thanks etops. You have to read the good, the bad and ugly and make up your own minds about things. Personally, I've known Parker since September 12, 2001..and i've come to admire his knowledge. I don't think there is a lineup of much better airline leaders out there that I would welcome just yet.
 
He raised $866 million from outside investors, and brought the airlines together in time to catch an updraft in ticket pricing that has restored the industry to rare profitability.


HE RAISED !?! And to think that Bruce Lakefield did absolutely NOTHING the entire time. Interesting.

Let's blow more smoke up our A$$ about DP and all you desert people love drinking your cactus kool-aid.
 
HE RAISED !?! And to think that Bruce Lakefield did absolutely NOTHING the entire time. Interesting.

Let's blow more smoke up our A$$ about DP and all you desert people love drinking your cactus kool-aid.
Please, don't give Lakefield credit for anything. He did nothing, and knew even less about the Airline industry. Bruce was nothing more than a hand-picked puppet of Bronner's brought in to put the finishing touches on the employee screw job of the century. Bronner shot off his big mouth way too many times, and had hopes that Bruce could possibly help him recover at least some of his investment in US.
Parker is miles above the long line of Morons that were once at the helm of US since 1989....At least he isn't using their strategy of Run, Shrink, and sell the Airline as fast as you can. B)
 
Funny last time I checked Seabury and Associates arranged the financing and they worked for Lakefield and US, not HP.

How US Airways/America West merger got off the ground
Talks between airlines began in 2003, but didn't get serious until this year
Sunday, May 22, 2005

By Dan Fitzpatrick, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The on-and-off, 18-month courtship between US Airways and America West Airlines finally clicked into place May 12 in Washington, D.C., high above the floor of the MCI Center, where executives from both airlines had gathered in US Airways' skybox to watch a Washington Wizards playoff game.

Just minutes before tip-off, with the din of exploding fireworks filling the arena, US Airways adviser John Luth received an e-mail on his BlackBerry from Air Canada Chief Executive Officer Robert Milton. It confirmed that Air Canada's board had approved an investment in the combined airline -- the final piece of a $1.5 billion financing package needed to make the deal work.

Luth waved his BlackBerry, smiled and gave everyone the news. He congratulated Doug Parker and Bruce Lakefield, the chief executive officers of America West and US Airways, and broad smiles broke out throughout the box.

The merger was on.

Announced a week later at the Tempe, Ariz., headquarters of America West, the agreement between the nation's seventh-and eight-largest airlines paired a twice-bankrupt, East Coast legacy carrier with a younger, smaller, low-cost airline that does much of its flying on the West Coast.

If they can win a slew of antitrust, shareholder and bankruptcy court approvals, US Airways and America West together would surpass discount king Southwest Airlines in size, becoming the No. 6 carrier in the nation. Together, they also could usher in an era of consolidation in the troubled airline industry, which has lost more than $30 billion since 2001.

But there were several twists along the way, according to people familiar with the events. America West was not the only carrier to express interest in US Airways, nor was America West the only partner US Airways pursued.

The search for a deal began in the fall of 2003, when David Siegel was still US Airways' chief executive officer. Siegel had led US Airways through its first bankruptcy and wrested more than $1 billion in concessions from the company's labor unions. But even as the carrier completed a painful round of cost cuts and emerged from bankruptcy, Siegel knew US Airways was still too small and too inefficient to compete against discounters such as Southwest, which had already announced plans to start service in Philadelphia, a US Airways' hub.

Siegel was convinced that for US Airways to avoid the fate of failed carriers such as Eastern Airlines and Pan Am, both of which liquidated in the 1980s, he would have to bring US Airways' costs down further and position the airline for consolidation with another carrier. He explored several options.

Acquire United Airlines, the nation's No. 2 carrier. That option was code-named "Project Minnow," with US Airways as the small fish gobbling the bigger one.

Combine with British entrepreneur Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic, which was interested in US Airways' Washington-Boston-New York shuttle, along with slots and gates in the Northeast.

Split the airline in two and merge the Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., hub-and-spoke network with one carrier and its slots and gates in Washington, Boston and New York with another.

But US Airways ultimately rejected those options. United did not have any interest in a deal and was too distracted by its own struggles in bankruptcy. Virgin Atlantic wanted lots of US Airways assets -- gates, planes, airport equipment -- to help launch a new U.S. airline, but all it would offer in retrun was the Virgin brand name. US Airways also turned down several inquiries from other carriers -- including Southwest, JetBlue Airways and AirTran Airways -- about acquiring the company's assets but not its employees.

In the end, only America West wanted both.

Siegel made the initial connection. He knew Parker and Executive Vice President Scott Kirby at America West. Their first face-to-face meeting was in October 2003, over dinner in a Washington, D.C., restaurant. They were joined by then-US Airways Chief Financial Officer Neal Cohen.

But the talks ended several months later. At the request of US Airways' board, Siegel departed from the company in April 2004. According to Parker, the first round of discussions failed because US Airways' costs were still too high. Siegel had started a campaign to lower union costs further, but labor leaders refused to deal with him, contributing to his ouster.

Retired Lehman Bros. executive Bruce Lakefield, a friend of US Airways chairman David Bronner, replaced Siegel and sought to save US Airways. He asked unions to help with another round of concessions. When that failed, Lakefield took the company into bankruptcy again and squeezed another $1 billion in concessions from the unions, using the power of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to hammer home new contracts modeled after America West's labor agreements.

In January, with fuel prices at a record high and doubts aired about US Airways' survival after its Christmas baggage meltdown in Philadelphia, Lakefield picked up the phone and called Parker, suggesting that "maybe we should begin those talks again," according to Parker.

But America West did not have enough cash to lift US Airways out of bankruptcy. It was up to Luth, the US Airways adviser, to find enough investment money to piece the deal together and give the combined company a fighting chance to thrive in the battered airline industry.

Luth and US Airways had serious discussions with more than a dozen investors. They all requested shared participation in a merged airline -- no one wanted to take on all the risk. The Retirement Systems of Alabama, which rescued US Airways from its first bankruptcy in 2003 with a $240 million investment, stands to lose it all if US Airways emerges from bankruptcy and issues new stock.

Luth went after the companies that had something to gain from an investment in US Airways and America West. Aircraft maker Airbus agreed to provide $250 million in exchange for US Airways' pledge to buy dozens of A320 jets in the future. Regional commuter carrier Air Wisconsin Airlines made a $125 million investment in exchange for a jet services partnership. The Appleton, Wis.-based airline will fly for the merged carrier on a contract basis.

Credit card companies may provide $300 million in order to reach new customers. And once-bankrupt Air Canada offered $75 million, good for a 7 percent stake in the new company, in exchange for the rights to bid on the maintenance contract for the new carrier's fleet of 361 jets.


Air Canada was the last in line.

Once its approval came last Thursday, employees at both airlines scrambled to obtain approval from their boards of directors. US Airways' directors signed off Wednesday, over the telephone. America West's board approved it Thursday, in Tempe.

Labor leaders were briefed, and a press release was sent out. Parker and Lakefield spent much of Thursday night explaining the deal to reporters before Lakefield took a red-eye flight back to Washington. Parker, who has been tapped to lead the merged airline, met with employees and went home. Before going to bed, he explained the deal in one final live shot with local TV, from his house.
 
... but without Bruce Lakefield no one at US Airways would know who Doug Parker is because the simple irrefutable fact is were it not for Bruces Lakefield neither US or HP would exist.
You lost all credibility with that statement. AWA would be out of business by now if it weren't for Lakefield? You didn't write that with a straight face did you?
 
He may or may not be miles ahead, history has yet to finish its chapter on Doug Parker, but without Bruce Lakefield no one at US Airways would know who Doug Parker is because the simple irrefutable fact is were it not for Bruces Lakefield neither US or HP would exist. Sorry to say but 35,000 people owe their jobs to a guy who knew little about the business, presided over the christmas meltdown all while desparately seeking funds to emerge from BK as a stand alone or with a merger partner.


This is the absolute truth. And I wish more people would realize this and give Lakefield his well earned credit.
 
Bob, have you forgotten all of Bonner's talk of Liquidation just prior to the busy holiday season a few years ago?? That did more damage to revenue than the wage reductions saved. :blink:
Lakefield didn't save anything, except maybe a few of Bonner's investment dollars. It still amazes me how people who don't even work for the company have such a great inside knowledge about everything from union contracts to the workings of upper managemt. :huh:
Lakefield did nothing except throw people off a sinking ship, which is nothing more than those before him did. I suppose this requires an MBA to accomplish in todays business environment. What he did could have been accomplished by anyone else who sat in his chair at the time. He was not the first CEO who was trying to peddle off US to another airline. Parker and HP would have made a play for US with or without Lakefield.
 
Guess you did not read the article, US contacted HP, not the other way around.
 
Good Riddance to Bronner and Lakefield-

Jerks---both of them...

Now if only the profite sharing is 1600.00 net I'll sing a dif tune.
Well, can't I dream and visualise?
 
Wings Wrote:
Please, don't give Lakefield credit for anything.

He did nothing, and knew even less about the Airline industry. Bruce was nothing more than a hand-picked puppet of Bronner's brought in to put the finishing touches on the employee screw job of the century.

He was indeed brought in by Bronner and his job was at that point to save as many jobs and as much of the investement as possible. Bruce Lakefield weather you like it or not is the reason their is a US Airways. He would himself admit to knowing little about the airline business BUT and this is huge, he did and does know how to shake the money tree. As for employee screw job, how can you blame him for what you & your colleagues voted in favor of. YOU had the power to close the place and chose not to. Maybe some had enough faith in Lakefield, maybe some were scared, but if you think you got screwed then look in the mirror, no one holds you at gun point to work for US Airways then or now.

Bronner shot off his big mouth way too many times, and had hopes that Bruce could possibly help him recover at least some of his investment in US.

Of this you've no idea. When I was still in CCY's good graces US Airways was within minutes of ink on paper with a deal that would have "Saved" PIT as a hub and guess who opened his mouth and stuck a knife through PIT's heart? Lakefield had a track record of quiet leadership and in holding companies together long enough to get them reorganized or sold. He got huge amounts of credit for saving Lehman Brothers.

Parker is miles above the long line of Morons that were once at the helm of US since 1989....At least he isn't using their strategy of Run, Shrink, and sell the Airline as fast as you can.

He may or may not be miles ahead, history has yet to finish its chapter on Doug Parker, but without Bruce Lakefield no one at US Airways would know who Doug Parker is because the simple irrefutable fact is were it not for Bruces Lakefield neither US or HP would exist. Sorry to say but 35,000 people owe their jobs to a guy who knew little about the business, presided over the christmas meltdown all while desparately seeking funds to emerge from BK as a stand alone or with a merger partner.

In the modern world of today, quiet, soft spoken leaders like Mr Lakefield have gone the way of the dinosaur, replaced by self promoting, greed riden, amoral and publicity seeking MBA's with little knowledge of anything that can't be quantified on a spreedsheet.

You have to give credit where credit is due and like it or not this whole current adventure started the day Bruce Lakefield walked through the doors in Crystal City.

One of the best posts I've read from you, and very accurate
as I remember the events.

Well done to "La Cucaracha"
 
I'm Not part of the COD (Cult of Doug) so I'm not blinded by his aura like some.
This isn't a "my CEO can beat up your CEO" argument. You can give Lakefield all the credit you want for keeping USAir alive until the white knight appeared. But to claim that he saved AWA is preposterous. In 2004-4 DP saw that AWA's future was uncertain so he looked for a partner. There's a big stretch going from that to saying that without Lakefield AWA wouldn't be here today. Practically all airlines were prosperous in 2006. Had USAirways survived to 2006 maybe even they would've shown some profit.
Who exactly was HP/Parker going to merge with to keep his operationaly unsound low rent craphole of an airline in business if not for US Airway having one foot in the grave and another on a Banana Peel?
Well, now you've proven you have no argument by resorting to dumb insults. I must've touched a nerve. Have a good cry any you'll feel better.
What you may NOT know is that on several occassions US Airways was DAYS from ceasing operations. NOT, weeks or months, but DAYS away.
Uh, the whole industry knew that. When did you find out?
So I think my credibility is just fine. Remember even the blessed, Holy Man hisself, Doug Parker stated HP was headed towards a possible C7 without the merger.
Yes, he said that. And from that you conclude that without Lakefield AWA was gone by now? Nope, your credibility is long gone.
 
Lakefield set in motion the events leading up to the merger.

So AWA was Lakefield's top choice for a merger partner? Since he was so in charge of the situation you'd think he would've bragged about it.

Without him AWA's future wss uncertain at best.

Every airline's future is uncertain because there's no such thing as the proverbial crystal ball. My guess: if it wasn't USAirways Parker would've found a different partner to dance with. PHX and LAS are growing revenue bases that some airline would've wanted.

BOTH airlines would not exist today so if US failed then no merger and likely no HP.

You state your opinion as if it were fact -- yet you're unable to provide any substantiation. HP was not in bankruptcy and not close to bankruptcy. Hence, it's illogical to conclude that absent a merger HP would not be here today especially in light of the industry-wide profits in 2006. You believe differently, fine, but if you want any credibility you need to show some kind of data to support your prognostication.

Well go you one further. If TPG was the original DIP financier would we even be having this debate?

Who the heck knows? As it so happens during my recurrent training in April 2005 I specifically asked Parker about TPG and he said they weren't a player in AWA's future.

Well I didn't want to put the whole devaluing of DM and seat pitch issues and 320 reconfig here. As for opperationally unsound consider this. HP is the ONLY large airline that doesn't print the PHX or LAS connecting gate on your boarding pass or provide same inflight because they are so inept at running the hubs they can't tell in advance what gate which flight will depart from

Having flown for two previous major carriers I certainly have no cause to brag about AWA's operation, yet HP posted several profitable quarters between 2003 and the AAA merger announcement. I'd say the level of "ineptness" at AAA far exceeded that of HP. Do you really think you're going to win an agrument about which airline is more f'd up operationally?

Also HP was within minutes of being grounded by the FAA around summer of 2000.

Prior management. Not to mention seven years ago. Should I try to dredge up some operational issue by Allegheny in 1967 to bolster my argument?

Upon reflection, I think low rent craphole was to kind

Wow, you're something. Lacking any real argument you think hurling insults helps you? Does your mommy know you're using her computer when you told her you were outside playing?

I conclude it from the Boy Wonder's own words and several articles that stated DP would have likely be overseeing a C7 proceeding instead of the current scenario

I'll say it again: AWA wasn't in bankruptcy nor in imminent danger of entering bankruptcy. You presume Lakefield was AWA's only chance for survival. Funny how nobody else (except a few USAir employee *experts*) has said so.
 
Lets try this again, read and comprehend 717:

How US Airways/America West merger got off the ground
Talks between airlines began in 2003, but didn't get serious until this year
Sunday, May 22, 2005

By Dan Fitzpatrick, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette

The on-and-off, 18-month courtship between US Airways and America West Airlines finally clicked into place May 12 in Washington, D.C., high above the floor of the MCI Center, where executives from both airlines had gathered in US Airways' skybox to watch a Washington Wizards playoff game.

Just minutes before tip-off, with the din of exploding fireworks filling the arena, US Airways adviser John Luth received an e-mail on his BlackBerry from Air Canada Chief Executive Officer Robert Milton. It confirmed that Air Canada's board had approved an investment in the combined airline -- the final piece of a $1.5 billion financing package needed to make the deal work.

Luth waved his BlackBerry, smiled and gave everyone the news. He congratulated Doug Parker and Bruce Lakefield, the chief executive officers of America West and US Airways, and broad smiles broke out throughout the box.

The merger was on.

Announced a week later at the Tempe, Ariz., headquarters of America West, the agreement between the nation's seventh-and eight-largest airlines paired a twice-bankrupt, East Coast legacy carrier with a younger, smaller, low-cost airline that does much of its flying on the West Coast.

If they can win a slew of antitrust, shareholder and bankruptcy court approvals, US Airways and America West together would surpass discount king Southwest Airlines in size, becoming the No. 6 carrier in the nation. Together, they also could usher in an era of consolidation in the troubled airline industry, which has lost more than $30 billion since 2001.

But there were several twists along the way, according to people familiar with the events. America West was not the only carrier to express interest in US Airways, nor was America West the only partner US Airways pursued.

The search for a deal began in the fall of 2003, when David Siegel was still US Airways' chief executive officer. Siegel had led US Airways through its first bankruptcy and wrested more than $1 billion in concessions from the company's labor unions. But even as the carrier completed a painful round of cost cuts and emerged from bankruptcy, Siegel knew US Airways was still too small and too inefficient to compete against discounters such as Southwest, which had already announced plans to start service in Philadelphia, a US Airways' hub.

Siegel was convinced that for US Airways to avoid the fate of failed carriers such as Eastern Airlines and Pan Am, both of which liquidated in the 1980s, he would have to bring US Airways' costs down further and position the airline for consolidation with another carrier. He explored several options.

Acquire United Airlines, the nation's No. 2 carrier. That option was code-named "Project Minnow," with US Airways as the small fish gobbling the bigger one.

Combine with British entrepreneur Richard Branson's Virgin Atlantic, which was interested in US Airways' Washington-Boston-New York shuttle, along with slots and gates in the Northeast.

Split the airline in two and merge the Philadelphia and Charlotte, N.C., hub-and-spoke network with one carrier and its slots and gates in Washington, Boston and New York with another.

But US Airways ultimately rejected those options. United did not have any interest in a deal and was too distracted by its own struggles in bankruptcy. Virgin Atlantic wanted lots of US Airways assets -- gates, planes, airport equipment -- to help launch a new U.S. airline, but all it would offer in retrun was the Virgin brand name. US Airways also turned down several inquiries from other carriers -- including Southwest, JetBlue Airways and AirTran Airways -- about acquiring the company's assets but not its employees.

In the end, only America West wanted both.

Siegel made the initial connection. He knew Parker and Executive Vice President Scott Kirby at America West. Their first face-to-face meeting was in October 2003, over dinner in a Washington, D.C., restaurant. They were joined by then-US Airways Chief Financial Officer Neal Cohen.

But the talks ended several months later. At the request of US Airways' board, Siegel departed from the company in April 2004. According to Parker, the first round of discussions failed because US Airways' costs were still too high. Siegel had started a campaign to lower union costs further, but labor leaders refused to deal with him, contributing to his ouster.

Retired Lehman Bros. executive Bruce Lakefield, a friend of US Airways chairman David Bronner, replaced Siegel and sought to save US Airways. He asked unions to help with another round of concessions. When that failed, Lakefield took the company into bankruptcy again and squeezed another $1 billion in concessions from the unions, using the power of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court to hammer home new contracts modeled after America West's labor agreements.

In January, with fuel prices at a record high and doubts aired about US Airways' survival after its Christmas baggage meltdown in Philadelphia, Lakefield picked up the phone and called Parker, suggesting that "maybe we should begin those talks again," according to Parker.

But America West did not have enough cash to lift US Airways out of bankruptcy. It was up to Luth, the US Airways adviser, to find enough investment money to piece the deal together and give the combined company a fighting chance to thrive in the battered airline industry.

Luth and US Airways had serious discussions with more than a dozen investors. They all requested shared participation in a merged airline -- no one wanted to take on all the risk. The Retirement Systems of Alabama, which rescued US Airways from its first bankruptcy in 2003 with a $240 million investment, stands to lose it all if US Airways emerges from bankruptcy and issues new stock.

Luth went after the companies that had something to gain from an investment in US Airways and America West. Aircraft maker Airbus agreed to provide $250 million in exchange for US Airways' pledge to buy dozens of A320 jets in the future. Regional commuter carrier Air Wisconsin Airlines made a $125 million investment in exchange for a jet services partnership. The Appleton, Wis.-based airline will fly for the merged carrier on a contract basis.

Credit card companies may provide $300 million in order to reach new customers. And once-bankrupt Air Canada offered $75 million, good for a 7 percent stake in the new company, in exchange for the rights to bid on the maintenance contract for the new carrier's fleet of 361 jets.

Air Canada was the last in line.


Once its approval came last Thursday, employees at both airlines scrambled to obtain approval from their boards of directors. US Airways' directors signed off Wednesday, over the telephone. America West's board approved it Thursday, in Tempe.

Labor leaders were briefed, and a press release was sent out. Parker and Lakefield spent much of Thursday night explaining the deal to reporters before Lakefield took a red-eye flight back to Washington. Parker, who has been tapped to lead the merged airline, met with employees and went home. Before going to bed, he explained the deal in one final live shot with local TV, from his house.
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Dan Fitzpatrick can be reached at [email protected] or 412-263-1752.
--------------------------------------------------------
Correction/Clarification: (Published 5/23/05) Air Canada, as part of an investment in the proposed US Airways-America West Airlines merger, has the right to bid only on the maintenance work that can be outsourced under existing labor contracts. It does not have the right to do the maintenance work on all 361 jets belonging to the combined airline, as described incorrectly in a story Sunday. )