What's new

Health Care

xUT said:
 
I think you have had that honor many years ago and consistently keep it updated. 🙄
 
 
Now you are just being funny. 😀
Why don't you get that mirror out. 😱
 
attachicon.gif
loser.gif
 
😛 xUT
 
1345228915683_8242793.png
 
Kev3188 said:
Great. They can petition their elected representatives to start the impeachment process, then.


Based on what (and how) you write for starters...


 
 

If this is your reason for supporting the current system, then I've clearly overestimated you...


How 'bout not from ridiculously high costs for procedures?

How 'bout not off the backs (and misery) of those that can least afford it?
How much did you have to invest (time and money) in your education in attaining your lifelong goal of becoming a bag loader vs. someone who became a heart surgeon?

Or maybe, since you believe no one should have more stuff than someone else, you should make as much as a heart surgeon!
 
"Do you believe no one should have more stuff than someone else and you should make as much as a heart surgeon!" IS the question !
 
Ms Tree said:
Do you know how ignorant you sound when you say that the 'profits' are being taxed?  The only money they pay tax on is money that is not substantially related to the businesses tax exempt purpose.  It would be pretty stupid if a tax exempt nonprofit had to pay tax.
 
When I said they are getting a pass I was referring to the fact that some CEO's and employees get paid very large salaries which take away from the funds that IMO should be put back in the company purpose.
 
You give your self far to much credit.  I would have to actually give a crap about your opinions for me to get pissed off.  You being an obnoxious douche at every given opportunity is merely an observation.
There you go again being an ignorant ass!

Profit Made from "Unrelated" Activities

"Sometimes, however, non-profits earn money on activities unrelated to their tax exempt purpose. In that case, the non-profit must pay taxes on the profit earned, just like any other business".
 
Findlaw link : http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/incorporation-and-legal-structures/non-profit-taxes-when-non-profits-make-a-profit.html

You couldn't have been referring to "the fact that some CEO's and employees get paid very large salaries which take away from the funds that IMO should be put back in the company purpose" because up to the point I enlightened you, you didn't even know non-profits made profits! 
 
As I stated several posts ago, I don't think non-profit means what you think it means!
 
 
 
Knotbuyinit said:
There you go again being an ignorant ass!Profit Made from "Unrelated" Activities"Sometimes, however, non-profits earn money on activities unrelated to their tax exempt purpose. In that case, the non-profit must pay taxes on the profit earned, just like any other business".
 
Findlaw link : http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/incorporation-and-legal-structures/non-profit-taxes-when-non-profits-make-a-profit.html
You couldn't have been referring to "the fact that some CEO's and employees get paid very large salaries which take away from the funds that IMO should be put back in the company purpose" because up to the point I enlightened you, you didn't even know non-profits made profits! 
 
As I stated several posts ago, I don't think non-profit means what you think it means!
Your reading comprehension sucks.
 
Ms Tree said:
Do you really think the republican base will accept a Rubio or a Christie?  I highly doubt it.  Rubio is for immigration reform and Christie is way to moderate.  I'm think the RNC base is going to go for a Ryan or Cruz.  They are going to have a rough time of it with moderates which is where the elections are won.  I think if Clinton or someone Clinton like were to run against the later two, the RNC will lose big, put Rubio or Christie on the ticket and the RNC has a very good chance depending on who the DNC puts up.
I support Cruz.
 
There is NO WAY I would vote for Hillary. I will not support liberal slime. Think how many times Hillary has flip flopped just this year. It was a video that got John Christopher Stevens killed right Hillary? Liar.
 
The fact she looked the other way while her husband had numerous affairs shows me she has a serious lack of self worth and character, and this is someone that the libtards paint as a champion of women's rights. What a joke.
 
I am hoping once Obama's reign ends (I say reign because he acts like a dictator) the Republicans will put an end to this atrocity called Obamacare.
 
Did anyone notice when Obamacare started falling apart the libtard media started referring to it as the ACA. 
 
 
 
To those of you who think Bill Clinton was such a good president maybe you should consider the things he has done to cause our current financial meltdown.
 
Rewriting the Community Reinvestment Act (Forcing banks to loan to people who had no realistic ability to pay the loan back)
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (cleared the way for "Too Big To Fail")
Commodity Futures Modernization Act (Credit Default Swaps)
 
Ms Tree said:
 
If you are aware of any nonprofits that have excess revenue at the end of the year beyond their endowments or savings you should probably report them to the IRS as they are in violation of the law.
 
So far as I am aware no nonprofit can legally make a profit.  They must spend all revenue in excess of their operating expenses on what ever their function is.  If they have profit left over, then the IRS is going to want to have a talk with the head of that company. 
 
Perhaps nonprofit does not mean exactly what you think it means.  Nonprofit does not mean no revenue.
 
Knotbuyinit said:
As expected, you know absolutely nothing about the structure of a non-profit organization! A nonprofit does not mean that the organization does not intend to make a profit, but rather that the organization has no owners and that the funds realized in the operation of the organization will not be used to benefit any owners.

http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/incorporation-and-legal-structures/non-profit-taxes-when-non-profits-make-a-profit.html
 
You ever do any research before running your smart mouth? As I stated before, non-profit hospitals make a fortune . . . here's just one example!

http://www.charlotteobserver.com/2012/04/21/3189821/nonprofit-hospitals-thrive-on.html#.UqIFc_KA3Dc

Is there anything else about an NPO you want me to straighten you out on?
 
So answer my question, are non-profit hospitals that make a profit a conflict of interest?
 
Ms Tree said:
 
That's exactly what I said
 
 
 
Are you ever not a condescending prick looking to pick a fight and ignoring the obvious?
 
The fact that various nonprofits abuse the system and get a pass from the IRS and Congress does not change what a nonprofit should be according to the IRS. 
 

Knotbuyinit said:
You're a liar, you had no idea that non-profits can make a legal profit or that many, if not most non-profit hospitals make a profit!  If you had known you wouldn't have told me to report them to the IRS!  LOL
 
Do you know how ignorant you sound when you spout BS like "non-profits that abuse the system and make a profit get a pass from the IRS"?  They are not getting a pass, idiot, they are paying taxes on the profits . . per IRS tax codes!
 
I didn't ignore the obvious! It was very obvious you had not a clue what you were talking about!  The fact that it pisses you off that I call you out is your problem and one you brought on yourself.
 


Ms Tree said:
Now I'm a liar?  You really are a class A douche.  I was aware that then can earn money and that the money they make should go back into the company which does not benefit any individual or share holder.  If I did not understand this why did I tell South to go look at how nonprofits fund their research?  It gets funded by their 'profits'.
 
Do you know how ignorant you sound when you say that the 'profits' are being taxed?  The only money they pay tax on is money that is not substantially related to the businesses tax exempt purpose.  It would be pretty stupid if a tax exempt nonprofit had to pay tax.
 
When I said they are getting a pass I was referring to the fact that some CEO's and employees get paid very large salaries which take away from the funds that IMO should be put back in the company purpose.
 
You give your self far to much credit.  I would have to actually give a crap about your opinions for me to get pissed off.  You being an obnoxious douche at every given opportunity is merely an observation.
 


Knotbuyinit said:
There you go again being an ignorant ass!
 
Profit Made from "Unrelated" Activities
 
"Sometimes, however, non-profits earn money on activities unrelated to their tax exempt purpose. In that case, the non-profit must pay taxes on the profit earned, just like any other business".
 
Findlaw link : http://smallbusiness.findlaw.com/incorporation-and-legal-structures/non-profit-taxes-when-non-profits-make-a-profit.html
 
You couldn't have been referring to "the fact that some CEO's and employees get paid very large salaries which take away from the funds that IMO should be put back in the company purpose" because up to the point I enlightened you, you didn't even know non-profits made profits! 
 
As I stated several posts ago, I don't think non-profit means what you think it means!
 


Ms Tree said:
Your reading comprehension sucks.


 
Are you trying to corner the market on stupidity Ms Tree?
 
You're doing a great job! 🙂
 
southwind said:
How much did you have to invest (time and money) in your education in attaining your lifelong goal of becoming a bag loader vs. someone who became a heart surgeon?

Or maybe, since you believe no one should have more stuff than someone else, you should make as much as a heart surgeon!
I think you are getting a little outside of reality. I seriously doubt Kev3188 thinks a "bag loader" should make as much as a heart surgeon. You do not have to agree with him politically (I don't) but, you could at least respect his opinions (I do) and not fabricate fantastic comparisons in an attempt to paint him a fool. 
 
Stop acting like a liberal.
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I am hoping once Obama's reign ends (I say reign because he acts like a dictator) the Republicans will put an end to this atrocity called Obamacare.
Explain how you think the ACA/Obamacare is going to be ended. Do you really think that 33 million people (a number I heard in a story yesterday) will stand for having their health care insurance taken away? Those are the ones with pre-existing conditions and people who are now eligible for medicare.

Also all the dependents under 26 years old would lose coverage from their parents.

And you cannot say that you would keep this part of the plan while getting rid of the part that makes healthy people buy comprehensive plans. Insurance only works with large numbers of healthy people in the pool.

So tell me how (politically) this can be done.

From an 2012 HHS Study:

"According to a new analysis by the Department of Health and Human Services, 50 to 129 million (19 to 50 percent of) non-elderly Americans have some type of pre-existing health condition. Up to one in five non-elderly Americans with a pre-existing condition 25 million individuals is uninsured. Under the Affordable Care Act, starting in 2014, these Americans cannot be denied coverage...

"As many as 82 million Americans with employer-based coverage have a pre-existing condition, ranging from life-threatening illnesses like cancer to chronic conditions like diabetes, asthma, or heart disease. Without the Affordable Care Act, such conditions limit the ability to obtain affordable health insurance if they become self-employed, take a job with a company that does not offer coverage, or experience a change in life circumstance, such as divorce, retirement, or moving to a different state. Older Americans between ages 55 and 64 are at particular risk: 48 to 86 percent of people in that age bracket have some type of pre-existing condition. And 15 to 30 percent of people in perfectly good health today are likely to develop a pre-existing condition over the next eight years, severely limiting their choices without the protections of the Affordable Care Act...

...The new report says that, of those Americans who are uninsured, 17 percent to 46 percent have medical conditions, depending on the definition used.

Such health problems, the study found, are especially common among adults ages 55 to 64 - a group long recognized as a problem spot in the health-care system, because people of that age tend to have higher medical expenses but do not yet qualify for Medicare."
 
southwind said:
"Do you believe no one should have more stuff than someone else and you should make as much as a heart surgeon!" IS the question !
Actually, it's not. And it's a silly one, at that.
 
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I think you are getting a little outside of reality. I seriously doubt Kev3188 thinks a "bag loader" should make as much as a heart surgeon. You do not have to agree with him politically (I don't) but, you could at least respect his opinions (I do) and not fabricate fantastic comparisons in an attempt to paint him a fool. 
 
Stop acting like a liberal.
Thank you. 🙂
 
La Li Lu Le Lo said:
I think you are getting a little outside of reality. I seriously doubt Kev3188 thinks a "bag loader" should make as much as a heart surgeon. You do not have to agree with him politically (I don't) but, you could at least respect his opinions (I do) and not fabricate fantastic comparisons in an attempt to paint him a fool. 
 
Stop acting like a liberal.
So why don't you tell us, because Kev and others haven't yet, been able to tell me just "WHO" should determine what someone makes, i.e. bag loader, heart surgeon or someone flipping burgers?
I always believed you were worth whatever someone was willing to pay you but, I'm sure Libtards believe BaRack and the government should determine how much you get paid, even though they're not the ones signing the check!
And one more thing, as far as I'm concerned, working at McDonalds use to be a job that was considered a stepping stone, i.e. highschool kids or someone working their way through college, and not for someone raising a family of 8!

And for the last time, since I haven't received and answer yet, if Bob and Jerome screw the same amount of lug nuts on the same vehicle, Bob is single and Jerome married with 5 kids, should Jerome be paid more in order to attain a "LIVING WAGE"? And just who determines what a "LIVING WAGE" is..............my guess is the government!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top