I've said this for a long time. AA's management "quality" is such that some manner of representation over and above what is afforded by employment law is necessary to deal with the "Good ol' boy" network within the salaried ranks, but representaion that works for the membership and not the company, as does the TWU.
Given no representation at all, AA labor would digress to the same level of cronyism in rather short order as there is no shortage of "the friendly sort" in TULE and probably the rest of the system. Time was, in a union shop, one didn't dare give the appearance of a "collaborator" - now it's accepted, unfortunately.
I'm still not certain, however, that AMP is the answer but, much the same as was AMFA once upon a time, it's now the only viable game in town - a position that implies the desperation of the present TWU membership to be rid of those who abused their trust.
I am curious as to what the AMP supporters see as the reaslitic timeline and path to a settlement. Here is my prediction: AMP gets vote around March/April 2011. AMP wins vote in May/June 2011. AMP hires pro negotiators next Aug 2011.
Path A: AMP demands Restore and More - company caves and gives everything back - new contract passes Fall 2011 - Yeah!!!!
Or Path B: NMB restarts negotiation clock. AMP takes hard line - puts up billboards/info pickets - no more discussions or working with management...AMP and AMR go back and forth like APA and company - get nowhere, but no impasse since clock restarted with new union. 2013 - members vote out AMP hard liners (see APA) and vote in reasonable people and get the 2010 TA in 2013 with a little inflation bump
Path C: AMR starts down the NWA road and ends up in strike/impasse....maximum bad feelings...hate discontent....resulting in either breaking union or BK....People take new jobs at AAR for 20% less but are glad they went down swinging...
What is the likely path? Would some one lke to sketch out a road to success?