What's new

PBS Colorado 911 Explosive Evidence

Ms Tree said:
The amount of things that need to be ignored to accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is staggering. You have to accept that all the people in all the agencies involved in the investigation are also involved in the cover up and have not spoken up over the past 13 years. You have to accept the fact that the planes that flew into the towers were also some how involved in the cover up or better yet a mere coincidence. You have to accept the fact that the explosives used in the demolition of two towers were installed, hidden from view and kept secret. These are just a few of the things that must be ignored to accept such a far flung conspiracy. It's a free world. People can think what they want, even if reality does not support it.
 
You also have to ask yourself what would be the point?  Planes already hit the building.  Why go through the trouble of planting explosives?  if you ask yourself that question and come up with something other that it makes no logical sense then you are probably wearing a tinfoil hat.
 
777 fixer said:
 
What evidence?  A video tape that provides no actual hard evidence?  The video tape made by a guy who has no expertise in controlled demolition of buildings?  The video tape that if you ask yourself some rather simple questions makes no logical sense at all.
 
So you have watched the entire video?
 
delldude said:
 
So you have watched the entire video?
 
Yes I have.  Have you watched any of the videos that claim it was not an AA 767 and UA 767 that hit WTC?  Or that it was not an AA 757 that hit the Pentagon?
 
777 fixer said:
 
Yes I have.  Have you watched any of the videos that claim it was not an AA 767 and UA 767 that hit WTC?  Or that it was not an AA 757 that hit the Pentagon?
 
Then how do you discount lab testing and results.
 
Only concerned with the forensic evidence AIA for 911 truth is seeking to have Congress open an investigation into.
 
Oh dear.....Experts speak.....
 
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw [/media]
 
delldude said:
Oh dear.....Experts speak.....
 
[media]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hZEvA8BCoBw [/media]
Debunked by using his own presentation:

http://oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-mark-basile-confirms-that-red-gray.html

"I will show that this conclusion is not warranted in any way. Instead, Basile's favorite specimen is organic by nature, with at most 1.3%, but perhaps 0%, of the heat of reaction coming from a thermite reaction, the balacnce, 98.7%-100%, from ordinary organic hydrocarbon combustion.

If this result is a confirmation of Harrit e.al., as 9/11 Truthers like to point out, then clearly this puts in grave doubt the affirmation that Harrit's chips were of thermitic nature."

We can do this all day.
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Debunked by using his own presentation:

http://oystein-debate.blogspot.com/2012/03/how-mark-basile-confirms-that-red-gray.html

"I will show that this conclusion is not warranted in any way. Instead, Basile's favorite specimen is organic by nature, with at most 1.3%, but perhaps 0%, of the heat of reaction coming from a thermite reaction, the balacnce, 98.7%-100%, from ordinary organic hydrocarbon combustion.

If this result is a confirmation of Harrit e.al., as 9/11 Truthers like to point out, then clearly this puts in grave doubt the affirmation that Harrit's chips were of thermitic nature."

We can do this all day.
 
And has been debunked......I believe the AIA boys found traces of the nano thermite on steel beams via SEM ..........
 
 
The chips that Basile and Harrit are nanothermite, not ordinary thermite.

Nanothermites are often mixed with carbon and silicon and other chemicals in a hybrid organic/inorganic matrix.

There is absolutely nothing suspicious about 70% of the chips being this matrix material..and that this material contributes to the energy release and the explosive nature...

These are in fact some of the signatures of superthermites!

Get a clue, get a clue....or stick to the homer simpsons of this world in the JREF forum....they do not mind if you miss little 'details' like these.
 
And your boy uses Wiki for a source.....isn't that a scholarly no no Dude?
 
Ms Tree said:
The amount of things that need to be ignored to accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is staggering. You have to accept that all the people in all the agencies involved in the investigation are also involved in the cover up and have not spoken up over the past 13 years. You have to accept the fact that the planes that flew into the towers were also some how involved in the cover up or better yet a mere coincidence. You have to accept the fact that the explosives used in the demolition of two towers were installed, hidden from view and kept secret. These are just a few of the things that must be ignored to accept such a far flung conspiracy. It's a free world. People can think what they want, even if reality does not support it.
 
How Could the Demolition Equipment Have Been Installed in the Twin Towers Without Tenants Noticing?
 
The simple answer is by disguising the equipment as normal building components, so that not even the workers installing the components are aware of the concealed pyrotechnics. Three aspects of the Hypothetical Blasting Scenario that facilitate this are: the stability and specificity of ignition conditions achievable with aluminothermic pyrotechnics, minimization of the required access to steelwork, and the use of a completely wireless ignition control system.
 
delldude said:
 
So your one "expert" Steven Jones seems to think that Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and an international banking cartel appear to be behind 9-11.  Considering both Wolfowitz and Perle are Jewish and words like "international banking cartel" has been used in the past as code word for Jews you can kinda figure out where he's coming from.
 
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/645201360/BYUs-Jones-denies-bias.html
 
delldude said:
 
How Could the Demolition Equipment Have Been Installed in the Twin Towers Without Tenants Noticing?
 
The simple answer is by disguising the equipment as normal building components, so that not even the workers installing the components are aware of the concealed pyrotechnics. Three aspects of the Hypothetical Blasting Scenario that facilitate this are: the stability and specificity of ignition conditions achievable with aluminothermic pyrotechnics, minimization of the required access to steelwork, and the use of a completely wireless ignition control system.
 
Is there a simple answer as to why?  As in why even bother going through the trouble since aircraft already hit the WTC?  An answer that isn't full of holes or sound bat s&%t crazy.
 
delldude said:
 
Then how do you discount lab testing and results.
 
Only concerned with the forensic evidence AIA for 911 truth is seeking to have Congress open an investigation into.
 
And if I were to ask you should open an investigation into the Bush administrations deceptions in the run up to the Iraq war your answer would be no.
 
777 fixer said:
 
So your one "expert" Steven Jones seems to think that Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle and an international banking cartel appear to be behind 9-11.  Considering both Wolfowitz and Perle are Jewish and words like "international banking cartel" has been used in the past as code word for Jews you can kinda figure out where he's coming from.
 
http://www.deseretnews.com/article/645201360/BYUs-Jones-denies-bias.html
 
If you read the article you linked, you can 'kinda' see he didn't realize it would be taken as it was and apologized.
 
Real biitch...Christ is a Jew too, that bother you?
 
"I'll stick with the science, thank you."    maybe you and Jones should get together.......LOL
 
777 fixer said:
 
Is there a simple answer as to why?  As in why even bother going through the trouble since aircraft already hit the WTC?  An answer that isn't full of holes or sound bat s&%t crazy.
 
Last I heard, it was designed to take those types of hits and fires and still stand.
 
777 fixer said:
 
And if I were to ask you should open an investigation into the Bush administrations deceptions in the run up to the Iraq war your answer would be no.
 
Just can't argue the facts so change the subject......
surprised-002.gif
 
777 fixer said:
 
And if I were to ask you should open an investigation into the Bush administrations deceptions in the run up to the Iraq war your answer would be no.
My only concern is the "Current" administrations deceptions!
 
Where to start.........
1. If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor........
2. Benghazi
3. IRS Scandal
 
just to start the ball rollin'
 

Latest posts

Back
Top