What's new

PBS Colorado 911 Explosive Evidence

SparrowHawk said:
Quag is a Government is the answer guy. He trusts Government and look how well that turned out for the Indians.
I'd agree with Quag more than a guy with a bag on his head like you, Sparrowhack. I may not agree with his politics yet he believes in a system rather than anarchy. You sound like Ward Churchill a radical who poisoned minds at the University of Colorado who thinks the US asked for what happened on 9/11. He probably smokes pot and voted for Ron Paul.

He got fired after an essay came to light. He was grilled on the Kelly File:

"So, the day of the 9/11 attacks you wrote an essay and referred to the 9/11 victims as Little Eichmanns, writing, quote, "If there was a better more effective or, in fact, any other way of visiting some penalty befitting their participation upon the Little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the Twin Towers, I'd really be interested in hearing about it."
How could you draw a moral equivalence between 3,000 dead Americans and a murderous Nazi like Adolf Eichmann?"

Transcript and video
http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/the-kelly-file/transcript/2014/09/09/exclusive-ward-churchill-defends-911-remarks

I'm glad this dope got fired.
 
Why don't you stick to giving Doug Parker Oral favors and let the adults discuss current events. How does it feel to work for a drunk? A convicted drunk at that? Not so bad I'm guessing since 2 of your pilots were convicted of same after being pulled off a flight. 
 
Not to mention the scab status of many of your colleagues.
 
To compare me to Ward Churchill shows your ignorance. Non Intervention is not isolationism or support for the enemy. 
 
Do you even have a clue what happened in 1953? Do you even know what the CIA calls "Blowback"?
 
BTW what is a fiat currency? What countries use it? HINT" It's not Italy and that didn't name a car company after it.
 
delldude said:
Good points, Jake.
 
Quag's will take the opinion of 2100 IPCC government subsidized scientists as gospel.
 
2100 Architects forensically dispute NIST investigation claims and they are wackos.
 
And in his sourcing, I didn't see anyone dispute the Assoc of Architects claims.
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think a degree in Bio medical engineering or computer programming makes you an architect.  If you go through their member list you can find people with degrees like that which means they are about as qualified as you or I.  My personal favorite is the person whose area of expertise is "Urban Activist".
 
Or how about the guy who says the FBI tired to blow up the WTC in 1993 and it's on video tape.  I'm sorry, but if you have people like that on your side I'm going to tend to believe you're a bunch of wackos.
 
delldude said:
 
They never made a claim as to who did it, just forensic evidence points to a controlled demolition......don't want to stick your neck out and be objective?
 
The question is are you being objective objective.  If you were you would have asked some rather basic questions.  Like who are these people making these claims.  As by the previous post they are not what you seem to think they are.  
 
What would be the point in a planting explosives?  The buildings were already hit by jet airliners so what would be gained by it?  What about the aircraft involved?  What role did they play?  Wouldn't the fires cause the explosives to either cook off or burn up?
 
SparrowHawk said:
Why don't you stick to giving Doug Parker Oral favors and let the adults discuss current events. How does it feel to work for a drunk? A convicted drunk at that? Not so bad I'm guessing since 2 of your pilots were convicted of same after being pulled off a flight. 
 
Not to mention the scab status of many of your colleagues.
 
To compare me to Ward Churchill shows your ignorance. Non Intervention is not isolationism or support for the enemy. 
 
Do you even have a clue what happened in 1953? Do you even know what the CIA calls "Blowback"?
 
BTW what is a fiat currency? What countries use it? HINT" It's not Italy and that didn't name a car company after it.
Weak.

I think you're a bit off topic Snooki. I'd expect that from a Jersey girl.
 
777 fixer said:
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think a degree in Bio medical engineering or computer programming makes you an architect.  If you go through their member list you can find people with degrees like that which means they are about as qualified as you or I.  My personal favorite is the person whose area of expertise is "Urban Activist".
 
Or how about the guy who says the FBI tired to blow up the WTC in 1993 and it's on video tape.  I'm sorry, but if you have people like that on your side I'm going to tend to believe you're a bunch of wackos.
 
Like any good conspiracy theory you have unrelated events strung together is plausible scenarios. However some of the "Truther" stuff is very compelling. It becomes more compelling if you think the world is run by a "shadow Government" of Banksters and crony capitalists.
 
One of the reasons I don't buy into these theories a whole lot is if you've ever worked in Sales you know that solving world hunger would be easier to accomplish then getting 6 salespeople to agree on where to have lunch in under 15 minutes.
 
777 fixer said:
 
Correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think a degree in Bio medical engineering or computer programming makes you an architect.  If you go through their member list you can find people with degrees like that which means they are about as qualified as you or I.  My personal favorite is the person whose area of expertise is "Urban Activist".
 
Or how about the guy who says the FBI tired to blow up the WTC in 1993 and it's on video tape.  I'm sorry, but if you have people like that on your side I'm going to tend to believe you're a bunch of wackos.
 
You are very correct and now will stand corrected. It is a member list. 777 Fixer is welcome to join. Just because someone who you think isn't qualified as an Architect or Engineer is a listed member doesn't mean they were involved in the findings. 
 
delldude said:
 
You are very correct and now will stand corrected. It is a member list. 777 Fixer is welcome to join. Just because someone who you think isn't qualified as an Architect or Engineer is a listed member doesn't mean they were involved in the findings. 
 
You just contradicted yourself.  And I quote 2100 Architects forensically dispute NIST investigation claims and they are wackos.
 
First they're 2100 architects who "forensically" disputed NIST.  When it comes out there are wackos making unsupported claims or people who have no engineering expertise it's just a membership list and that I can join as well.  
 
777 fixer said:
 
You just contradicted yourself.  And I quote 2100 Architects forensically dispute NIST investigation claims and they are wackos.
 
First they're 2100 architects who "forensically" disputed NIST.  When it comes out there are wackos making unsupported claims or people who have no engineering expertise it's just a membership list and that I can join as well.  
 
 
You just can't deal with the evidence..........
24.gif

 
It will not go away.
 
The amount of things that need to be ignored to accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is staggering. You have to accept that all the people in all the agencies involved in the investigation are also involved in the cover up and have not spoken up over the past 13 years. You have to accept the fact that the planes that flew into the towers were also some how involved in the cover up or better yet a mere coincidence. You have to accept the fact that the explosives used in the demolition of two towers were installed, hidden from view and kept secret. These are just a few of the things that must be ignored to accept such a far flung conspiracy.

It's a free world. People can think what they want, even if reality does not support it.
 
Ms Tree said:
The amount of things that need to be ignored to accept the idea that 9/11 was an inside job is staggering. You have to accept that all the people in all the agencies involved in the investigation are also involved in the cover up and have not spoken up over the past 13 years. You have to accept the fact that the planes that flew into the towers were also some how involved in the cover up or better yet a mere coincidence. You have to accept the fact that the explosives used in the demolition of two towers were installed, hidden from view and kept secret. These are just a few of the things that must be ignored to accept such a far flung conspiracy. It's a free world. People can think what they want, even if reality does not support it.
 
Then why do these people want Congress to reopen the investigation based soley on evidence they have found contrary to the 'official' investigation?
 
That's all this is about.
 
Would any of the theorists accept any finding of any investigation other than what they already believe happened?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Would any of the theorists accept any finding of any investigation other than what they already believe happened?
 
I can't speak for others.
 
The Forensic evidence proves the original investigation was lacking.
 
Dispute that.....of course one would have to watch the presentation with an open mind which will never happen with several here.
 
What do you do if serving on a jury?
 
In your line, would you watch the TWA 800  documentary produced by ret NTSA and  other gov't officials that offers forensic evidence counter to the 'official' investigation?
 
Glenn Quagmire said:
Would any of the theorists accept any finding of any investigation other than what they already believe happened?
 
The answer to that should be a rather obvious no.  Why, do you think someone who says for example the FBI tried to blow up the WTC in 1993 is going to change their mind?  And more importantly there are people making money of this sort of non-sense.  You think they are going to change their mind?
 
delldude said:
 
 
You just can't deal with the evidence..........
24.gif

 
It will not go away.
 
What evidence?  A video tape that provides no actual hard evidence?  The video tape made by a guy who has no expertise in controlled demolition of buildings?  The video tape that if you ask yourself some rather simple questions makes no logical sense at all.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top