PBS Colorado 911 Explosive Evidence

[Ms Tree]

How do you get tons of explosives and miles of wiring in a building with no one seeing it?

 

[777 fixer]

 
If you weren't going off half cocked, you would have seen and understood the glaring inconsistencies realized in the NIST investigation.
 
Logic and deductive reasoning and a lifetime in Architecture is why these 'kooks' pointed out inconsistencies in the first place.

 
Just because someone spends a lifetime doing something does not mean they are good at it.
 
Did you ever bother to question their so called evidence?  If you do it should not take you to long to find the holes, and apparent lack of common sense, in their argument.  I already pointed one out to so you have a head start.

 

[southwind]

How do you get tons of explosives and miles of wiring in a building with no one seeing it?

Ever hear of "Wireless Technology"?
 
Oh and found this with a quick search of "Powerful small exsplosives"!
 
HMX
 
Also known as octogen or cyclotetramethylene-tetranitramine, this is a powerful and relatively insensitive nitroamine high explosive, used almost exclusively in military applications. It is currently considered the state-of-the-art military explosive.
 
Also, not sure if you've ever watched a documentary on the demolition of buildings but , usually it's not about how much explosive is needed, but where the explosive is placed!

 

[Ms Tree]

Ever hear of "Wireless Technology"?
 
Oh and found this with a quick search of "Powerful small exsplosives"!
 
HMX
 
Also known as octogen or cyclotetramethylene-tetranitramine, this is a powerful and relatively insensitive nitroamine high explosive, used almost exclusively in military applications. It is currently considered the state-of-the-art military explosive.
 
Also, not sure if you've ever watched a documentary on the demolition of buildings but , usually it's not about how much explosive is needed, but where the explosive is placed!

Wireless transmitters and explosive. Sure. Are you nuts? No one uses wireless for demolitions. But lets.say they did. You still have to get tons and tons of explosives as well as hundres and hundres of structural cuts with no one knowing.

The idea of this is beyond insane.

 

[delldude]

 
Just because someone spends a lifetime doing something does not mean they are good at it.
 
Did you ever bother to question their so called evidence?  If you do it should not take you to long to find the holes, and apparent lack of common sense, in their argument.  I already pointed one out to so you have a head start.

 
Yeah big glaring hole....like NIST saying they didn't find any explosive residue.....then later in the same report NIST admitted they never tested for explosives......duh
 
I liked the big glaring hole with actual interviews of firemen and others who heard explosions prior to 7 coming down.....and then another glaring hole of public service personnel mentioning it on recorded transmissions between dispatch and command plus written transcripts of the same.
 
Or the another glaring hole of explosive residue found on various beams and structure identified on a SEM.
 
I see your point.

 

[delldude]

Wireless transmitters and explosive. Sure. Are you nuts? No one uses wireless for demolitions. But lets.say they did. You still have to get tons and tons of explosives as well as hundres and hundres of structural cuts with no one knowing.

The idea of this is beyond insane.

 
Better tell the boys down NAVSPECWARCOM.

 

[777 fixer]

 
Yeah big glaring hole....like NIST saying they didn't find any explosive residue.....then later in the same report NIST admitted they never tested for explosives......duh
 
I liked the big glaring hole with actual interviews of firemen and others who heard explosions prior to 7 coming down.....and then another glaring hole of public service personnel mentioning it on recorded transmissions between dispatch and command plus written transcripts of the same.
 
Or the another glaring hole of explosive residue found on various beams and structure identified on a SEM.
 
I see your point.

 
How about the glaring hole of no one producing any actual evidence that there was this massive conspiracy to blow it up.  How about the the fact the whole idea makes absolutely no sense.

 

[delldude]

 
How about the glaring hole of no one producing any actual evidence that there was this massive conspiracy to blow it up.  How about the the fact the whole idea makes absolutely no sense.

 
Maybe that's why the Architect group stated from the getgo that this things needs to be re-investigated like they said a few times in their documentary.
 
Or did you miss that part?

 

[Glenn Quagmire]

Keep investigating until you get the outcome you desire.

If one starts with a theory that they are convinced is true, they will do all they can to cherry pick bits and pieces to make it sound plausible.

"Barkun: The appeal of conspiracism is threefold. First, conspiracy theories claim to explain what others can't. They appear to make sense out of a world that is otherwise confusing. Second, they do so in an appealingly simple way, by dividing the world sharply between the forces of light and the forces of darkness. They trace all evil back to a single source, the conspirators and their agents. Finally, conspiracy theories are often presented as special, secret knowledge unknown or unappreciated by others. For conspiracists, the masses are a brainwashed herd, while the conspiracists in the know can congratulate themselves on penetrating the plotters' deceptions."

 

[traderjake]

.....and Oswald was the lone gunman

 

[Ms Tree]

You still have not even given a stupid idea much less a plausible theory as to how you get thousands if not tens of thousands of pounds of explosives and wiring in a building with no one noticing it. Then you have to make hundreds if not thousands of structural cuts in all the main structural points with no one knowing it.

How ever unlikely you think it is that a building can collapse on its own, the likelihood of you theory being carried out in not one but two buildings with out anyone getting suspicious is exponentially more unlikely.

 

[traderjake]

Three  buildings collasped on 911, not two.
 
Do you have any idea what your talking about?

 

[Ms Tree]

No theory huh? May be aliens did it,

 

[traderjake]

How Could They Plant Bombs in the World Trade Center?
 
http://georgewashington.blogspot.com/2005/11/how-could-they-plant-bombs-in-world.html
 
Recently, a smart, accomplished person told me:

"I don't believe that the World Trade Center could have been destroyed by controlled demolition . . . how could they have possibly planted bombs without anyone seeing them?"

In fact, there were plenty of opportunities to plant bombs in the World Trade Center. For example:

Bomb-sniffing dogs were inexplicably removed from the Twin Towers five days before 9-11

The Twin Towers had been evacuated a number of times in the weeks preceding 9/11

Workers in the Twin Towers observed heavy work taking place on supposedly empty floors in the weeks before 9-11; supposedly, the work took place on floors the elevators would not stop on without a special access key (toward the end of the video).

There was a power down in the Twin Towers on the weekend before 9/11, security cameras were shut down, and many workers ran around busily doing things unobserved.

Bombs could have been placed during renovation of the elevators in the Twin Towers.

And -- as an interesting coincidence -- a Bush-linked company ran security at the trade centers, thus giving it free reign to the buildings.

These are just a few of the known, public examples of opportunities to plant bombs. There were undoubtedly many additional opportunities available to skilled operatives.

See also this video.

 

[delldude]

Keep investigating until you get the outcome you desire.

If one starts with a theory that they are convinced is true, they will do all they can to cherry pick bits and pieces to make it sound plausible.

"Barkun: The appeal of conspiracism is threefold. First, conspiracy theories claim to explain what others can't. They appear to make sense out of a world that is otherwise confusing. Second, they do so in an appealingly simple way, by dividing the world sharply between the forces of light and the forces of darkness. They trace all evil back to a single source, the conspirators and their agents. Finally, conspiracy theories are often presented as special, secret knowledge unknown or unappreciated by others. For conspiracists, the masses are a brainwashed herd, while the conspiracists in the know can congratulate themselves on penetrating the plotters' deceptions."

 
In your zeal to attempt to discount what you perceive to be a conspiracy theory......you and your lackeys on this forum failed consistently to notice this group did not offer some conspiracy theory.... rather they offered their own findings and proved what they found and merely said that there were grave inconsistencies in the NIST investigation that should be re-investigated........that is all they said.
 
They never attempted to show who or what conspired to accomplish this deed, only showed provable scientific evidence that was found on site....and showed where the NIST investigation was quite lacking.
 
You should realize, as federal koolaid drinker, I have empathy for your resistance to any outside opinion that would go against the koolaid de jour.