Is it being flown on "East Metal"?
Good question. I assumed it will be but I could be wrong.
Is it being flown on "East Metal"?
Well lets just look at the Press Release..... it claims the Flight will operate via a B757 seating 12 and 164, that is a TA East B757. The West ETOPS B757 seat 14 and 176. So Yes, it looks like it will be East Metal.Good question. I assumed it will be but I could be wrong.
Well lets just look at the Press Release..... it claims the Flight will operate via a B757 seating 12 and 164, that is a TA East B757. The West ETOPS B757 seat 14 and 176. So Yes, it looks like it will be East Metal.
I understand what you are saying but I don't think you have the full picture. PBI, PVD, RDU, CLE and BDL are all smaller markets with limited demand out of PHX. PVD is really just a BOS alternative. (AA/Eagle doesn't even fly there.) IAD and MIA are both hubs for much bigger airlines so we're going to be limited on that end. PHX-LAX flight reductions are partly because we can move pax from BOS to LAX through PHL/CLT as just one example. This helps free up seats to PHX for connections to other cities that can't be done from PHL/CLT. Another reason is that demand in the entire Southwest region is down. If people aren't traveling there's no point in flying the plane.aptboeses - thanks for the reply. By no means was I implying that we should have started PHX-ARN or PHX-GIG instead of from the respective bases. What I would have liked to see, however, is more nonstop growth connectivity from PHX to newer destinations. Areas that were pre-merger strongholds, like PBI, PVD, RDU. Instead, it seems like a lot of connectivity to PHX has been decreased with the elimination of RDU, MIA, CLE, IAD, BDL, and decreases in numerous cities in FLA, CMH, BWI, etc. I know the argument can be said that "it's more efficient to route people through CLT/PHL" to connect to these cities, BUT, at the same time, I see more frequencies on nonstops PHL/CLT to the West coast (ie: overflying PHX), meaning that it's not efficient to route people though PHX. As an example, the airline used to route East coast passengers to the West coast through PHX/LAS. Now, frequency/capacity has increased between PHL/CLT to LAX/SAN/LAS/SFO and we've seen a reduction on, for example LAX-PHX from 12 flts/day to 6 flts/day. The same pattern can be observed with the services to ANC, HNL, PDX, TUS to name a few.
Freighterguy - One of my friends is PHX-based and he mentions that much of the new flying is given to East coast bases and company isn't really expanding flying/growth out of the PHX base. Any hub needs to have prime connectivity or good O&D to survive. Since PHX has neither that is stellar compared to other 'jewels' in the airline industry like ORD, EWR, etc, US Airways has to keep connectivity at PHX if it wants to maintain a competitive advantage against Mr. Bags Fly Free. I'm not that concerned whether flying goes East/West, I'm much more concerned to see more East coast connectivity overflying PHX and really diminishing the need to have a hub in the first place. It's how CMH died for HP and many other bases with other airlines.