delldude
Veteran
Sarah and McCain's endorsements are fantasy...Obama/Biden's are REAL
Your boy Biden just gave McCain the best endorsement ever...... :huh:
Dem's agree its McCain
Sarah and McCain's endorsements are fantasy...Obama/Biden's are REAL
Considering that McCain has a lot of the same advisors as Shrub, the village idiot, perhaps if there is an attack, McCain can get us bogged down in a war in Venezuela. There's a lot of oil fields for Halliburton to expropriate there; particularly, since the plan for Halliburton to run Iraq seems not to have worked out the way it was planned. Poor Halliburton had to report a quarterly loss the other day--down YOY from a $727 million quarterly profit from the taxpayers last year.
Actually, he is saying that President Obama is up for the task and will meet it...unlike ERRATIC, Senile, ancient, lost GREAT GRANDPA!
What is being interpreted is an Obama administration will bring an attack on the US and Obama has no inkling of military matters or responses.A McCain administration in its existence alone will deter......Powell just got thrown under the bus.
http://in.youtube.com/watch?v=oRUhlws5TOI
(LOL.....delusional. Sure he did...that's why Obama's numbers jumped 2 points after Powell's endorsement.)
his endorsement does not necessarily validate the Democrat candidate judgement more than likely he is making himself available to discuss foreign policy and defense issues with a novice senator(who has potential)...one who still has a lot to learn but certainly has capacity...at the same time distancing himself as far as possible from the current administration.Actually, he is saying that President Obama is up for the task
What is being interpreted is an Obama administration will bring an attack on the US and Obama has no inkling of military matters or responses.A McCain administration in its existence alone will deter......Powell just got thrown under the bus.
Seems to me all military experience does is .... hmmm .. don't know. When it comes to running a country it would seem it does not make a dam bit of difference.
Seems to me all military experience does is .... hmmm .. don't know. When it comes to running a country it would seem it does not make a dam bit of difference. So perhaps there is something else that makes a successful presidency. Maybe it has something to do with cabinet and advisor's?
Go ahead and say it .... it's Clintons fault. Everything else for the past 8 years has been his fault so why not continue the trend?
You've made an excellent point for Sarah Palin and becoming president.
Another excellent point....however to blame Clinton alone is not fair at all.....the majority of our current dilemma falls on the heels of Democrat decisions over the past 20+ years and yes there are GOP people there also.....but the brunt is the results of Democratic attempts to bring socialism into American lives at the cost of the taxpaying public.Obama is going to institute the same policies and will leave America worse off than we are now if elected.
Did you see the comedy team of Frank and Dodd grilling the financial people as to why Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac failed even though they were responsible???
That alone should have been on SNL.......
it does seem to make a difference with many when the country is actually at war, however Nov 4 will determine if the majority is ok with it...or without it..when they vote and the results come in..
I made a case neither for nor against her. Her 'experience' matters little. History has shown that being a governor has little if anything to do with a POTUS success. I believe her blind belief (faith) in religion will be a good indication of the type of people who she would surround her self with. People with such blind beliefs tend to surround them selves with the same type of people (look at W Bush's cabinet).
You are showing your true colors......Its ok that Obama lacks experience and can rely on advisers but if Palin is in the same boat its not cool.... :blink:
Republicans have controlled the house for 12 out of the last 20 years (I believe) and they had a republican President for 6 out of the 12 yet Dems are primarily responsible? How does that math work?
Why haven't there been any congressional hearings into who did what at Fannie and Freddie?Because no GOP are involved.....