Status Of IAM Grievance

[insp89]

i just checked the website and looked for the case number.
Here
http://www.vaeb.uscourts.gov/cal/al/mitdoc/0315.htm

http://www.vaeb.uscourts.gov/cal/al/Pages/...%20Calendar.htm

av60,
Thanks for listing the Judge's website..

 

[Henderfuzz]

av60,

Ok someone help me here. Is the companys claim the 3rd one of the 3 to be heard. It doenst look like the first 2.
What am I missing.

 

[insp89]

Henderfuzz,
I believe that you are correct, but I am not sure if it's the third claim listed on the judges calendar.
Hopefully av60 can help us out..

 

[av60]

Henderfuzz,
I believe that you are correct, but I am not sure if it's the third claim listed on the judges calendar.
Hopefully av60 can help us out..

Im really not sure that the snap back is on the adgenda for that day. Cant get any info from the links. Even if it is on the adgenda for that day, i dont expect much will happen.

 

[Charlie_Tuna]

Im really not sure that the snap back is on the adgenda for that day. Cant get any info from the links. Even if it is on the adgenda for that day, i dont expect much will happen.

The change of control is not on the list. That is not to say it won't be heard that day anyway. You need to look for Entry # 4426 (docket) or just call Terry Miller @ 703-258-1251

 

[insp89]

av60, Charlie_Tuna,
Thanks for the Info...

 

[Henderfuzz]

Ok guys as I understand this. The hearing on Thursday is with the bankruptancy judge. He is only to decide weather he has jurisdition to rule on the arbitration griviance.
As the IAM has stated he should not have any since the company is no longer in BR. This case should be heard as by law as a griviance by an arbitrator that both parties have already agreed on.
What this company is really tring to do is change the law in this case. Thats why this is so important for everyone to understand that what they are trully tring to do here.

 

[diogenes]

Absolutely amazing the new US (new HQ, new execs, etc.) is just as mendacious, grasping and double-dealing as the the old US.

Birds of a feather?

At this rate, within 6 months somebody's going to be pining for the good old days of Uncle Al.

At least you knew where you stood with him (a peasant lucky to have a job, and a cost to be reduced/eliminated), and none of this rah-rah, just-call-me-Doug BS.

 

[insp89]

Henderfuzz, diogenes,
Seems to me that the company is desperate, trying to drag a bankruptcy judge into the middle of a arbitration case.
I would like to see the judge laugh them right out his chamber, and tell them to do what they agreed upon, arbitration..
Just more 'foot dragging' from this company.

 

[diogenes]

Given the political climate working folks have allowed to develop in the US, I would not be at all surprised to see the judge rule on some issue that will at best, kick the can down the road, and at worst, find for the company.

If Doug is the straight arrow some in the West says he is ( a reputation that has taken a beating of late), why is he not dealing in good faith?

He's no different from Siegel, in my view.