What's new

Temporary Injunction against USAPA filed today

Your short absence from here hasn't changed you I see. You have been given revisionist history if that's what you've been told. I guess they omitted the "DOH or else" petitions, the threats of recalling the MC members and MEC resolution... :lol:

Jim

Nor did your vacation change you. I made an offer to a mutual friend to try to end the animosity between us. I guess you decided not to. It shows the worthless individual you are.

Yes, all those things happened, but at first the merger committee was given free rein to come up with an agreement. Remember "Save Dave"? Their right, it seemed to work, but blew up in all our faces and now they want to change history. Fact. Go f yourself. See ya around town.
 
Your last paragraph is a complete lie. If you had any clue as to what this C&Rs consisted even you would gave cringed. You east guys were telling us to eat the proverbial #### sandwich and telling us how great or was going to taste.

Nice try with that. What other BS you got?
 
Your last paragraph is a complete lie. If you had any clue as to what this C&Rs consisted even you would gave cringed. You east guys were telling us to eat the proverbial #### sandwich and telling us how great or was going to taste.

Nice try with that. What other BS you got?
Who are you responding to? Blood pressure up? Forgot continuity? Nice overload, there, chump!
 
Jim,

I have talked with you since PI days.

I cannot believe that you are so shallow as that.

As what, wanting whatever method suits your side best?

The DOH basis always presents an easier basis upon which to base conditions and restrictions

I see you're not familiar with the PI/US merger C&R's. Slotting, BTW, would have eliminated the need for 90+% of them.

DOH, in the case of east and west, with conditions and restrictions, protects the west dudes most of all

You either haven't looked at USAPA's C&R's, just bought into USAPA's myth, read them for what you wanted them to say (unlikely), or are a laugh a minute.

especially down the road.

Or as Colodny testified in the US/PI arbitration, "If those PI boys will just be patient the growth will take care of everyone." Of course, that growth ended 2 years later...

Jim
 
As what, wanting whatever method suits your side best?



I see you're not familiar with the PI/US merger C&R's. Slotting, BTW, would have eliminated the need for 90+% of them.



You either haven't looked at USAPA's C&R's, just bought into USAPA's myth, read them for what you wanted them to say (unlikely), or are a laugh a minute.



Or as Colodny testified in the US/PI arbitration, "If those PI boys will just be patient the growth will take care of everyone." Of course, that growth ended 2 years later...

Jim

So, you need to talk with KIrsch, I see.

USAPA came well after the ALPA debacle. While I am not surprised you try to conflate their machinations with USAPA, I am somewhat disappointed.

and, you believed Colodny? Because your PI culture demanded you respect anyone just because they were there?

I am really sorry because I truly understand, though I completely disagree, with your stance. Did I say, completely?
 
Thanks for admitting your revisionist history.

Jim
That is not what he said. and you know it.

He is simply pointing out that your shallow view was inconsistent with a longer, historical view. In truth, the merger committee initially went in with their eyes and ears open. They came back with the slotting bs and we then said DOH.

I really appreciate your ability to research. In this case I believe you are wrong.
 
In truth, the merger committee initially went in with their eyes and ears open. They came back with the slotting bs and we then said DOH.

Which is what I said - the East MC was forced in a DOH or nothing stance.

BTW, I worked pretty closely with Kirsch - the MC was present at every bid closing for 8-10 years after the US/PI merger. He even had me take his place when he couldn't be in PIT for a conference with the other side's MC over how to implement a C&R.

Jim
 
Thanks for admitting your revisionist history.

Jim

As you revised and edited my post. You have shown over and over what you are. Go falsely out someone again. Westies, your messiah has no intergity, don't follow him. He is just an angry old man.
 
As you revised and edited my post. You have shown over and over what you are. Go falsely out someone again. Westies, your messiah has no intergity, don't follow him. He is just an angry old man.

I didn't revise or edit. I quoted (precisely) what I considered to be the pertinent part. Did you or did you not say that the MEC decided to go into arb with their best case? Oh, look - I believe you did. How convenient to "forget" what happened after "the merger committee was given free rein" and "The MEC then decided to go into arb. with their best case." "Minor" details like DOH petitions, recall threats, and an MEC resolution forcing the MC to seek DOH in negotiations slip your mind? One can certainly revise history by leaving out a few pertinent events.... :lol:

Jim
 
I would really like to see an "anti-USAPA letter from 2004." Please post.

USAPA was not even a glimmer of an idea prior to May 2007.

You go girl.

RR

Thanks girlfriend. My typo and I've corrected it. Good to know you're looking out for me.

As promised and sorry it took so long. I had to wait for a friend to send it to me as I didn't have it on my iPad (for you old east pilots, that's a fancy computer).
 

Attachments

Speaking of compromise, let's see how willing you guys were to compromise:

http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/merger/

Is your signature there?

I liked the most recent the very best (it's like a Cleary Lady-in-Waiting)...

736 Name: Robert Bate on Aug 21, 2011
State: Tennessee
Country: United States
Comments: DONT CARE ONE BIT ABOUT ANY COMPROMISE. DOH OR LET IT BURN. DONT CARE WHAT U THINK. I WOULD WORK FOR FREE BEFORE I'LL FLUSH ANY PILOT JUNIOR TO ME. .
😱
 

Latest posts

Back
Top